White Barbara, Furst Daniel E, Frech Tracy M, Kuwana Masataka, Hummers Laura, Stevens Wendy, Kafaja Suzanne, Lee Eun Bong, Distler Oliver, Khanna Dinesh, Denton Christopher P, Spiera Robert
Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc, Norwood, Massachusetts, USA (current address: SFJ Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Pleasanton, California, USA).
University of California, Los Angeles.
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2025 Mar;7(3):e70004. doi: 10.1002/acr2.70004.
The RESOLVE-1 trial of lenabasum in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) allowed background immunosuppressive therapy (IST) at the discretion of individual investigators, and no significant differences were observed between treatment arms. This provides a powerful opportunity to compare the relative efficacy of different ISTs in a well-defined large cohort of patients with dcSSc.
Prespecified IST categories, efficacy end points, baseline disease characteristics likely to influence efficacy outcomes, the definition of interstitial lung disease, definitions of IST use, and categories of IST use by which efficacy outcomes were evaluated were. Descriptive statistics are used to present results.
For skin, change in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) was numerically greatest with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment in patients with the earliest disease, reaching -10.8 points in the MMF group versus -4.8 points in the no IST group in patients with a disease duration ≤2 years. Other ISTs had improvements intermediate between that seen in the MMF and no IST groups. Forced vital capacity (mL) was stable over 52 weeks in patients in the MMF group compared to an around 160-mL decline over 52 weeks in no IST group. Differences in outcome were observed between antinuclear antibody subgroups, with greater difference in favor of MMF for skin and lungs being observed in anti-topoisomerase 1 autoantibody-positive patients. In contrast, anti-RNA polymerase III autoantibody-positive patients in both the no IST and MMF groups improved rapidly, with a decrease in mRSS.
Taken together, our findings robustly support routine use of MMF in dcSSc and show benefit especially in early-stage disease. Those patients with high-risk antibodies for lung fibrosis might be especially suitable for MMF treatment.
在弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症(dcSSc)中进行的lenabasum的RESOLVE-1试验允许各研究者自行决定是否进行背景免疫抑制治疗(IST),且各治疗组之间未观察到显著差异。这为比较不同IST在一大群明确界定的dcSSc患者中的相对疗效提供了有力机会。
预先设定的IST类别、疗效终点、可能影响疗效结果的基线疾病特征、间质性肺病的定义、IST使用的定义以及评估疗效结果所依据的IST使用类别。采用描述性统计来呈现结果。
对于皮肤,在疾病最早期的患者中,霉酚酸酯(MMF)治疗使改良罗德南皮肤评分(mRSS)的变化在数值上最大,疾病持续时间≤2年的患者中,MMF组的mRSS达到-10.8分,而无IST组为-4.8分。其他IST的改善情况介于MMF组和无IST组之间。与无IST组在52周内约160毫升的下降相比,MMF组患者的用力肺活量(毫升)在52周内保持稳定。在抗核抗体亚组之间观察到了结果差异,在抗拓扑异构酶1自身抗体阳性患者中,MMF在皮肤和肺部方面的优势差异更大。相比之下,无IST组和MMF组中的抗RNA聚合酶III自身抗体阳性患者改善迅速,mRSS下降。
综合来看,我们的研究结果有力地支持在dcSSc中常规使用MMF,并显示出尤其是在疾病早期的益处。那些具有肺纤维化高风险抗体的患者可能特别适合MMF治疗。