Suppr超能文献

高强度间歇训练对中心血压的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Central Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Departamento de Educação Física, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR - Brasil.

Grupo de Pesquisa em Hipertensão Arterial Sistêmica, Rigidez Arterial e Envelhecimento Vascular (GPHARV), Universidade Estadual de Maringá,Maringá, PR - Brasil.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Mar;120(4):e20220398. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220398.

Abstract

Central blood pressure (cBP) is considered an independent predictor of organ damage, cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Evidence has shown that high intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for improving cardiorespiratory fitness and vascular function. However, the effects of these aerobic training modalities on cBP have not yet been properly reviewed.This meta-analysis aims to investigate to effects of HIIT versus MICT on cBP.We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared HIIT versus MICT on cBP. Primary outcomes were measures of central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) and central diastolic blood pressure (cDBP). Peripheral systolic blood pressure (pSBP) and diastolic blood pressure (pDBP), pulse wave velocity (PWV) and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) were analyzed as second outcomes. Meta-analysis of mean differences (MD) was conducted using the random effects model.Our study included 163 patients enrolled in six trials. We found that HIIT was superior to MICT in reducing the cSBP (MD = -3.12 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.75 to -1.50, p = 0.0002) and SBP (MD = -2.67 mmHg, 95% CI: -5.18 to -0.16, p = 0.04), and increasing VO2max(MD = 2.49 mL/kg/min, 95% CI: 1.25 to 3.73, p = 0.001). However, no significant differences were reported for cDBP, DBP and PWV.HIIT was superior to MICT in reducing the cSBP, which suggests its potential role as a non-pharmacological therapy for high blood pressure.

摘要

中心血压(cBP)被认为是器官损伤、心血管事件和全因死亡率的独立预测因子。有证据表明,高强度间歇训练(HIIT)在改善心肺适应性和血管功能方面优于中等强度持续训练(MICT)。然而,这些有氧运动方式对 cBP 的影响尚未得到充分研究。本荟萃分析旨在探讨 HIIT 与 MICT 对 cBP 的影响。

我们对比较 HIIT 与 MICT 对 cBP 的影响的随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析。主要结局指标为中心收缩压(cSBP)和中心舒张压(cDBP)。外周收缩压(pSBP)和舒张压(pDBP)、脉搏波速度(PWV)和最大摄氧量(VO2max)作为次要结局进行分析。采用随机效应模型进行均数差值(MD)的荟萃分析。

我们的研究纳入了 6 项试验中的 163 名患者。我们发现,与 MICT 相比,HIIT 更能降低 cSBP(MD = -3.12mmHg,95%CI:-4.75 至-1.50,p = 0.0002)和 SBP(MD = -2.67mmHg,95%CI:-5.18 至-0.16,p = 0.04),并提高 VO2max(MD = 2.49mL/kg/min,95%CI:1.25 至 3.73,p = 0.001)。然而,cDBP、DBP 和 PWV 无显著差异。

与 MICT 相比,HIIT 更能降低 cSBP,这表明其作为高血压非药物治疗的潜在作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8c6/10263426/2936740359b2/0066-782X-abc-120-04-e20220398-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验