Department of Physiology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
J Burn Care Res. 2023 Nov 2;44(6):1466-1477. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad057.
Propranolol, timolol, and minoxidil have all shown benefits in treatment of burn injury and other skin wounds. The study evaluated their effects on full-thickness thermal skin burns in a Wistar rat model. Performed on 50 female rats; two dorsal skin burns were created on each animal. On the next day, the rats were divided into 5 groups (n = 10); each has received a specific treatment daily for 14 days: group I-topical vehicle (control), group II-topical silver sulfadiazine (SSD), group III-oral propranolol (5.5 mg) associated with topical vehicle, group IV-topical timolol 1% cream, and group V-topical minoxidil 5% cream. Wound contraction rates, malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH, GSSG), and catalase activity in skin and/or serum were evaluated, and histopathological analyses were performed. Propranolol did not show advantages in necrosis prevention and wound contraction and healing, and did not reduce oxidative stress. It impaired keratinocyte migration, and promoted ulceration, chronic inflammation, and fibrosis, yet reducing the necrotic zone. Timolol prevented necrosis and promoted contraction and healing, increased antioxidant capacity and promoted keratinocyte migration and neo capillarization in comparison to the other treatments. Minoxidil reduced necrosis and enhanced contraction, resulting in positive outcomes after 1 week of treatment regarding local antioxidant defense, keratinocyte migration, neo capillarization, chronic inflammation, and fibrosis rates. However, after 2 weeks, it resulted in contrasting outcomes. In conclusion, topical timolol promoted wound contraction and healing, reducing local oxidative stress and improving keratinocyte migration, bringing arguments for potential benefits in skin epithelization.
普萘洛尔、噻吗洛尔和米诺地尔均已显示出在治疗烧伤和其他皮肤创伤方面的益处。本研究评估了它们在 Wistar 大鼠全层热皮肤烧伤模型中的作用。在 50 只雌性大鼠上进行;每只动物背部造成两处皮肤烧伤。次日,将大鼠分为 5 组(n = 10);每组每天接受特定治疗 14 天:I 组-局部载体(对照),II 组-局部磺胺嘧啶银(SSD),III 组-口服普萘洛尔(5.5mg)联合局部载体,IV 组-局部噻吗洛尔 1%乳膏,V 组-局部米诺地尔 5%乳膏。评估了创面收缩率、丙二醛(MDA)、谷胱甘肽(GSH、GSSG)和皮肤/血清中的过氧化氢酶活性,并进行了组织病理学分析。普萘洛尔在预防坏死和促进创面收缩和愈合方面没有优势,也不能减轻氧化应激。它会损害角质形成细胞迁移,并促进溃疡、慢性炎症和纤维化,但减少了坏死区。与其他治疗方法相比,噻吗洛尔可预防坏死并促进收缩和愈合,增加抗氧化能力并促进角质形成细胞迁移和新生血管化。米诺地尔可减少坏死并增强收缩,在治疗 1 周后对局部抗氧化防御、角质形成细胞迁移、新生血管化、慢性炎症和纤维化率产生积极影响。然而,在治疗 2 周后,产生了相反的结果。总之,局部使用噻吗洛尔可促进创面收缩和愈合,减轻局部氧化应激,改善角质形成细胞迁移,为皮肤上皮化带来潜在益处的论据。