• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以人为本的设计在孕产妇保健社会决定因素方面的应用:有意义的利益相关者参与方法。

Human-centered design in the context of social determinants of health in maternity care: methods for meaningful stakeholder engagement.

机构信息

Department of Graphic, Experience, and Industrial Design, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2205282. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2205282.

DOI:10.1080/17482631.2023.2205282
PMID:37099749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10134912/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The screening process for social determinants of health (SDoH) includes questions regarding life circumstances and barriers to accessing health care. For patients, these questions may be intrusive, biased, and potentially risky. This article describes human-centered design methods to engage birthing parents and health care team members around SDoH screening and referral in maternity care.

METHODS

Three phases of qualitative research with birthing parents, health care teams, and hospital administrators were conducted in the United States. Shadowing, interviews, focus groups, and participatory workshops addressed the explicit and tacit concerns of the stakeholders regarding SDoH during maternity care.

RESULTS

Birthing parents wanted to be informed of the purpose of the clinic collecting SDoH information and how this information is used. Health care teams want to feel they are providing reliable and quality resources to their patients. They would like greater transparency that administrators are acting on SDoH data and the information is reaching people that can assist patients.

CONCLUSION

As clinics implement patient-centered strategies for addressing SDoH in maternity care, it is important to include patients' perspectives. This human-centered design approach advances understanding of knowledge and emotional needs around SDoH and offers insights to meaningful engagement around sensitive health data.

摘要

目的

社会决定因素健康(SDoH)的筛查过程包括有关生活环境和获得医疗保健障碍的问题。对于患者而言,这些问题可能具有侵扰性、偏见性且潜在风险较高。本文描述了以人为中心的设计方法,用于围绕产妇护理中的 SDoH 筛查和转介,让产妇及其医疗保健团队成员参与其中。

方法

在美国进行了三个阶段的定性研究,对象是产妇、医疗保健团队和医院管理人员。通过观察、访谈、焦点小组和参与式研讨会,解决了利益相关者在产妇护理期间对 SDoH 的明确和隐含关注。

结果

产妇希望被告知诊所收集 SDoH 信息的目的以及如何使用这些信息。医疗保健团队希望他们能够为患者提供可靠和高质量的资源。他们希望增加透明度,让管理员对 SDoH 数据采取行动,并且信息能够传递给可以帮助患者的人。

结论

随着诊所实施以患者为中心的策略来解决产妇护理中的 SDoH 问题,了解患者的观点非常重要。这种以人为中心的设计方法推进了对 SDoH 相关知识和情感需求的理解,并为围绕敏感健康数据进行有意义的参与提供了见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/10134912/82e4d84855a3/ZQHW_A_2205282_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/10134912/9d8fcfd22831/ZQHW_A_2205282_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/10134912/541ef579bd69/ZQHW_A_2205282_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/10134912/39eb6d9fa011/ZQHW_A_2205282_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/10134912/82e4d84855a3/ZQHW_A_2205282_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/10134912/9d8fcfd22831/ZQHW_A_2205282_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/10134912/541ef579bd69/ZQHW_A_2205282_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/10134912/39eb6d9fa011/ZQHW_A_2205282_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/10134912/82e4d84855a3/ZQHW_A_2205282_F0004_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Human-centered design in the context of social determinants of health in maternity care: methods for meaningful stakeholder engagement.以人为本的设计在孕产妇保健社会决定因素方面的应用:有意义的利益相关者参与方法。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2205282. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2205282.
2
Screening and Referral for Social Determinants of Health: Maternity Patient and Health Care Team Perspectives.健康社会决定因素的筛查与转诊:产妇及医疗团队视角
Health Equity. 2022 Dec 5;6(1):887-897. doi: 10.1089/heq.2022.0020. eCollection 2022.
3
Do healthcare providers consider the social determinants of health? Results from a nationwide cross-sectional study in the United States.医疗保健提供者是否考虑健康的社会决定因素?来自美国全国性横断面研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10656-2.
4
Using quality improvement to address social determinants of health needs in perinatal care.利用质量改进来满足围产期护理中的社会决定健康需求。
Semin Perinatol. 2024 Apr;48(3):151908. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2024.151908. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
5
Development of Social Determinants of Health Screening Tool (SDoHST): qualitative validation with stakeholders and patients in South Australia.健康决定因素筛查工具(SDoHST)的制定:南澳大利亚利益相关者和患者的定性验证。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Jan;39(1):131-140. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2144053. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
6
The time is now: Fostering relationship-centered discussions about patients' social determinants of health.现在是时候了:培养以关系为中心的关于患者健康的社会决定因素的讨论。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Apr;102(4):810-814. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Social determinants of health as barriers to care for vasculitis: perspectives of patients and healthcare providers.社会决定因素对血管炎患者医疗的阻碍:患者和医疗服务提供者的观点。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Oct;43(10):3183-3193. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07082-4. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
8
Patient and Care Team Perspectives on Social Determinants of Health Screening in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.患者和医疗团队对初级保健中健康筛查的社会决定因素的看法:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2345444. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45444.
9
Beyond Birth Work: Addressing Social Determinants of Health With Community Perinatal Support Doulas.超越分娩工作:通过社区围产期支持导乐来解决健康的社会决定因素。
Clin Nurs Res. 2024 Jun;33(5):316-325. doi: 10.1177/10547738241244590. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
10
Evaluation of a social determinants of health screening questionnaire and workflow pilot within an adult ambulatory clinic.评估一个社会决定健康因素筛查问卷和成人门诊工作流程试点。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Dec 24;22(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01598-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Individuals' Desire for Social Needs Sharing Among Healthcare Providers: Findings from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey.医疗服务提供者之间社会需求共享的个体意愿:2022年健康信息国家趋势调查结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jan 28. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09339-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening and Referral for Social Determinants of Health: Maternity Patient and Health Care Team Perspectives.健康社会决定因素的筛查与转诊:产妇及医疗团队视角
Health Equity. 2022 Dec 5;6(1):887-897. doi: 10.1089/heq.2022.0020. eCollection 2022.
2
Perceived discrimination during the childbirth hospitalization and postpartum visit attendance and content: Evidence from the Listening to Mothers in California survey.产妇在分娩住院和产后访视期间感知到的歧视,以及其内容:来自加利福尼亚州倾听母亲调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 23;16(6):e0253055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253055. eCollection 2021.
3
Informed Consent and Shared Decision Making in Obstetrics and Gynecology: ACOG Committee Opinion Summary, Number 819.
妇产科知情同意和共同决策:ACOG 委员会意见摘要,第 819 号。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb 1;137(2):392-393. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004248.
4
Social and Structural Determinants of Health Inequities in Maternal Health.孕产妇健康不平等的社会和结构决定因素。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Feb;30(2):230-235. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8882. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
5
Innovating health care: key characteristics of human-centered design.创新医疗保健:以人为本设计的关键特征。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jan 12;33(Supplement_1):37-44. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa127.
6
Human-centered design for global health equity.以人类为中心的全球健康公平设计。
Inf Technol Dev. 2019 Sep 29;26(3):477-505. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2019.1667289.
7
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 729: Importance of Social Determinants of Health and Cultural Awareness in the Delivery of Reproductive Health Care.美国妇产科医师学会第729号委员会意见:健康的社会决定因素及文化意识在提供生殖保健服务中的重要性。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;131(1):e43-e48. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002459.
8
Creativity and Innovation in Health Care: Tapping Into Organizational Enablers Through Human-Centered Design.医疗保健中的创造力与创新:通过以人为本的设计挖掘组织推动因素。
Nurs Adm Q. 2018 Jan/Mar;42(1):62-75. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000267.
9
Suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: Maternal and pediatric health outcomes and costs.美国的母乳喂养不充分:母婴健康结果与成本
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Jan;13(1). doi: 10.1111/mcn.12366. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
10
A review of the design and development processes of simulation for training in healthcare - A technology-centered versus a human-centered perspective.医疗保健培训模拟的设计与开发过程综述——以技术为中心与以人 为中心的视角
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jan;58:314-326. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Jul 27.