Maternal and Fetal Medicine Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep;62(3):422-429. doi: 10.1002/uog.26234.
To investigate whether arterial stiffness (AS) differs between healthy women and women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) managed by different treatment modalities.
This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study comparing AS in pregnancies complicated by GDM and low-risk controls. AS was assessed by recording aortic pulse-wave velocity (AoPWV), brachial augmentation index (BrAIx) and aortic augmentation index (AoAIx) using the Arteriograph® at four gestational-age windows: 24 + 0 to 27 + 6 weeks (W1); 28 + 0 to 31 + 6 weeks (W2); 32 + 0 to 35 + 6 weeks (W3) and ≥ 36 + 0 weeks (W4). Women with GDM were considered both as a single group and as subgroups stratified by treatment modality. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model on each AS variable (log-transformed) with group, gestational-age window, maternal age, ethnicity, parity, body mass index, mean arterial pressure and heart rate as fixed effects and individual as a random effect. We compared the group means including relevant contrasts and adjusted the P-values using Bonferroni correction.
The study population comprised 155 low-risk controls and 127 women with GDM, of whom 59 were treated with dietary intervention, 47 were treated with metformin only and 21 were treated with metformin + insulin. The two-way interaction term of study group and gestational age was significant for BrAIx and AoAIx (P < 0.001), but there was no evidence that mean AoPWV was different between the study groups (P = 0.729). Women in the control group demonstrated significantly lower BrAIx and AoAIx compared with the combined GDM group at W1-W3, but not at W4. The mean difference in log-transformed BrAIx was -0.37 (95% CI, -0.52 to -0.22), -0.23 (95% CI, -0.35 to -0.12) and -0.29 (95% CI, -0.40 to -0.18) at W1, W2 and W3, respectively. The mean difference in log-transformed AoAIx was -0.49 (95% CI, -0.69 to -0.30), -0.32 (95% CI, -0.47 to -0.18) and -0.38 (95% CI -0.52 to -0.24) at W1, W2 and W3, respectively. Similarly, women in the control group also demonstrated significantly lower BrAIx and AoAIx compared with each of the GDM treatment subgroups (diet, metformin only and metformin + insulin) at W1-W3. The increase in mean BrAIx and AoAIx seen between W2 and W3 in women with GDM treated with dietary management was attenuated in the metformin-only and metformin + insulin groups. However, the mean differences in BrAIx and AoAIx between these treatment groups were not statistically significant at any gestational-age window.
Pregnancies complicated by GDM demonstrate significantly higher AS compared with low-risk pregnancies regardless of treatment modality. Our data provide the basis for further investigation into the association of metformin therapy with changes in AS and risk of placenta-mediated diseases. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
探讨不同治疗方式管理的妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)孕妇与健康孕妇的动脉僵硬度(AS)是否存在差异。
这是一项前瞻性纵向队列研究,比较了 GDM 合并妊娠和低危对照组的 AS。使用 Arteriograph® 在四个妊娠龄窗口记录主动脉脉搏波速度(AoPWV)、肱动脉增强指数(BrAIx)和主动脉增强指数(AoAIx):24+0 至 27+6 周(W1);28+0 至 31+6 周(W2);32+0 至 35+6 周(W3)和≥36+0 周(W4)。GDM 孕妇按单一组和治疗方式分层的亚组进行比较。使用线性混合模型对每个 AS 变量(对数转换)进行分析,组、妊娠龄窗口、母亲年龄、种族、产次、体重指数、平均动脉压和心率为固定效应,个体为随机效应。我们比较了组平均值,包括相关对比,并使用 Bonferroni 校正调整 P 值。
研究人群包括 155 名低危对照组和 127 名 GDM 孕妇,其中 59 名接受饮食干预,47 名仅接受二甲双胍治疗,21 名接受二甲双胍+胰岛素治疗。研究组和妊娠龄的双向交互作用在 BrAIx 和 AoAIx 方面具有统计学意义(P<0.001),但在研究组之间没有证据表明平均 AoPWV 存在差异(P=0.729)。与 GDM 组相比,对照组在 W1-W3 时的 BrAIx 和 AoAIx 显著降低,但在 W4 时则不然。对数转换的 BrAIx 平均值差异分别为-0.37(95%CI,-0.52 至-0.22)、-0.23(95%CI,-0.35 至-0.12)和-0.29(95%CI,-0.40 至-0.18)。对数转换的 AoAIx 平均值差异分别为-0.49(95%CI,-0.69 至-0.30)、-0.32(95%CI,-0.47 至-0.18)和-0.38(95%CI,-0.52 至-0.24)。同样,与对照组相比,GDM 各治疗亚组(饮食、仅二甲双胍和二甲双胍+胰岛素)的 W1-W3 时的 BrAIx 和 AoAIx 也明显较低。在接受饮食管理的 GDM 孕妇中,W2 至 W3 期间 BrAIx 和 AoAIx 的平均值增加幅度在接受二甲双胍治疗的孕妇中减弱。然而,在任何妊娠龄窗口,这些治疗组之间的 BrAIx 和 AoAIx 平均值差异均无统计学意义。
无论治疗方式如何,患有 GDM 的妊娠均表现出明显更高的 AS。我们的数据为进一步研究二甲双胍治疗与 AS 变化和胎盘介导疾病风险之间的关系提供了依据。©2023 作者。约翰威立父子公司出版超声在妇产科由国际妇产科超声学会。