• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别烧伤后情绪和社交互动管理困难的风险人群。

Identifying Populations at Risk for Difficulty Managing Emotions and Social Interactions After Burn Injury.

机构信息

Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2023 Nov 2;44(6):1400-1404. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad060.

DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irad060
PMID:37099804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10600321/
Abstract

There has been conflicting data on the relationship between burn severity and psychological outcomes. The present study aims to characterize the baseline psychosocial disposition of adults attending outpatient burn clinic at a large urban safety net hospital, as well as the impact of clinical course on self-reported psychosocial well-being. Adult patients attending outpatient burn clinic completed survey questions from the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Managing Chronic Conditions: Self-Efficacy for Managing Social Interactions (SEMSI-4) and Managing Emotions (SEME). Sociodemographic variables were collected from surveys and retrospective chart review. Clinical variables included total body surface area burned, initial hospital length of stay, surgical history, and days since injury. Poverty level was estimated by U.S. census data using patient's home ZIP code. Scores on SEME-4 and SEMSI-4 were compared to the population mean by one-sample T-test, and independent variables evaluated for associations with managing emotions and social interactions by Tobit regression while adjusting for demographic variables. The 71 burn patients surveyed had lower scores in SEMSI-4 (mean = 48.0, P = .041) but not SEME-4 (mean = 50.9, P = .394) versus the general population. Marital status and neighborhood poverty level were associated with SEMSI-4, while length of stay and % total body surface area burned were associated with SEME-4. Patients who are single or from poorer neighborhoods may have difficulty interacting with their environment after burn injury and need extra social support. Prolonged hospitalization and increased severity of burn injury may have more impact on emotional regulation; these patients may benefit from psychotherapy during recovery.

摘要

关于烧伤严重程度与心理结果之间的关系,一直存在相互矛盾的数据。本研究旨在描述在大型城市医疗服务机构的门诊烧伤诊所就诊的成年患者的基线心理社会状况,以及临床病程对自我报告的心理社会健康的影响。在门诊烧伤诊所就诊的成年患者完成了来自美国国立卫生研究院患者报告的结果测量信息系统管理慢性疾病的调查问题:管理社交互动的自我效能(SEMSI-4)和管理情绪(SEME)。从调查和回顾性图表审查中收集了社会人口统计学变量。临床变量包括全身烧伤面积、初始住院时间、手术史和受伤后天数。通过患者家庭的邮政编码,使用美国人口普查数据来估计贫困水平。通过单样本 T 检验将 SEME-4 和 SEMSI-4 的分数与总体平均值进行比较,并通过 Tobit 回归评估独立变量与管理情绪和社交互动的关联,同时调整人口统计学变量。接受调查的 71 名烧伤患者的 SEMSI-4 评分较低(平均值=48.0,P=0.041),但 SEME-4 评分无差异(平均值=50.9,P=0.394)与一般人群相比。婚姻状况和邻里贫困水平与 SEMSI-4 相关,而住院时间和全身烧伤面积百分比与 SEME-4 相关。单身或来自贫困社区的患者在烧伤后可能难以与环境互动,需要额外的社会支持。长时间住院和烧伤严重程度增加可能对情绪调节的影响更大;这些患者可能在康复期间受益于心理治疗。

相似文献

1
Identifying Populations at Risk for Difficulty Managing Emotions and Social Interactions After Burn Injury.识别烧伤后情绪和社交互动管理困难的风险人群。
J Burn Care Res. 2023 Nov 2;44(6):1400-1404. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad060.
2
Mortality risk and length of stay associated with self-inflicted burn injury: evidence from a national sample of 30,382 adult patients.与自伤性烧伤相关的死亡风险和住院时间:来自30382名成年患者全国样本的证据。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):118-25. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000293122.43433.72.
3
A population-based study of the epidemiology of acute adult burn injuries in the Calgary Health Region and factors associated with mortality and hospital length of stay from 1995 to 2004.基于人群的卡尔加里健康区域成人急性烧伤流行病学研究及与 1995 年至 2004 年死亡率和住院时间相关的因素。
Burns. 2009 Jun;35(4):572-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.10.003. Epub 2009 Feb 8.
4
Peer Support Groups: Identifying Disparities to Improve Participation.同伴支持小组:发现差异,提高参与度。
J Burn Care Res. 2022 Sep 1;43(5):1019-1023. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac086.
5
Long term mortality in critically ill burn survivors.重症烧伤幸存者的长期死亡率。
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
6
The social milieu of burn injury and recovery: using "social capital" as a framework for evaluating sex differences.烧伤损伤与康复的社会环境:以“社会资本”为框架评估性别差异
J Burn Care Res. 2008 Jan-Feb;29(1):123-9. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31815fa45d.
7
Burn injury outcome differences in Native Americans.美国原住民烧伤损伤结局的差异。
Burns. 2019 Mar;45(2):494-501. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
8
Self-inflicted burn injuries: Etiologies, risk factors and impact on institutional resources.自伤性烧伤:病因、危险因素及对机构资源的影响。
Burns. 2019 Feb;45(1):213-219. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.07.016. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
9
Socioeconomic status, gender, and burn injury: A retrospective review.社会经济地位、性别与烧伤:一项回顾性研究。
Am J Surg. 2017 Oct;214(4):677-681. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
10
[Epidemiological characteristics and outcome analysis of 266 patients with inhalation injuries combined with total burn area less than 30% total body surface area].266例吸入性损伤合并烧伤总面积小于30%体表面积患者的流行病学特征及预后分析
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 20;37(4):340-349. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200229-00106.

引用本文的文献

1
[Pay attention to burn rehabilitation assessment].注意烧伤康复评估。
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 20;39(12):1109-1114. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230831-00070.