• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化血压控制对 60 岁以上患者的影响:SPRINT、STEP 和 ACCORD BP 随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Intensive blood pressure control for patients aged over 60: A meta-analysis of the SPRINT, STEP, and ACCORD BP randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China; Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.

出版信息

Maturitas. 2023 Jun;172:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.04.009. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.04.009
PMID:37099984
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of intensive treatment to lower blood pressure (BP) on the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among patients aged over 60 years.

STUDY DESIGN

We extracted individual-level data of participants aged over 60 years from the SPRINT study and ACCORD study first, and then conducted a meta-analysis of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and other adverse events (hypotension and syncope) and renal outcomes across the SPRINT, STEP, ACCORD BP trials, which included 18,806 participants over 60 years of age. Participants were randomized to receive standard BP treatment or intensive BP treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to calculate summary statistics.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis, intensive treatment did not decrease either the all-cause mortality rate (HR: 0.98; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-1.26; p = 0.87) or the cardiovascular mortality rate (HR: 0.77; 95 % CI: 0.54-1.08; p = 0.13). The incidence of MACEs (HR: 0.83; 95 % CI: 0.74-0.94; p = 0.003) and stroke (HR: 0.70; 95 % CI: 0.56-0.88; p = 0.002) was reduced, however. Intensive treatment had no effect on acute coronary syndrome (HR: 0.87; 95 % CI: 0.69-1.10; p = 0.24) or heart failure (HR: 0.70; 95 % CI: 0.40-1.22; p = 0.21). Intensive treatment increased the risk of hypotension (HR: 1.46; 95 % CI: 1.12-1.91; p = 0.006) and syncope (HR: 1.43; 95 % CI: 1.06-1.93; p = 0.02). Intensive treatment did not increase the risk of impaired kidney function among patients with chronic kidney disease (HR: 0.98; 95 % CI: 0.41-2.34; p = 0.96) or without chronic kidney disease (HR: 1.77; 95 % CI: 0.48-6.56; p = 0.40) at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive BP goals reduced the incidence of MACEs and increased the risk of other adverse events without significant changes in mortality or renal outcome.

摘要

目的

评估强化降压治疗对 60 岁以上患者发生心血管疾病(CVD)的影响。

研究设计

我们首先从 SPRINT 研究和 ACCORD 研究中提取了 60 岁以上参与者的个体水平数据,然后对 SPRINT、STEP 和 ACCORD BP 试验中的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和其他不良事件(低血压和晕厥)以及肾脏结局进行了荟萃分析,共纳入 18806 名 60 岁以上的参与者。参与者被随机分配接受标准血压治疗或强化血压治疗。

主要观察指标

使用风险比(HRs)计算汇总统计数据。

结果

在这项荟萃分析中,强化治疗并未降低全因死亡率(HR:0.98;95%置信区间[CI]:0.76-1.26;p=0.87)或心血管死亡率(HR:0.77;95%CI:0.54-1.08;p=0.13)。然而,MACEs(HR:0.83;95%CI:0.74-0.94;p=0.003)和中风(HR:0.70;95%CI:0.56-0.88;p=0.002)的发生率降低。强化治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征(HR:0.87;95%CI:0.69-1.10;p=0.24)或心力衰竭(HR:0.70;95%CI:0.40-1.22;p=0.21)没有影响。强化治疗增加了低血压(HR:1.46;95%CI:1.12-1.91;p=0.006)和晕厥(HR:1.43;95%CI:1.06-1.93;p=0.02)的风险。强化治疗并未增加慢性肾脏病患者(HR:0.98;95%CI:0.41-2.34;p=0.96)或无慢性肾脏病患者(HR:1.77;95%CI:0.48-6.56;p=0.40)肾功能受损的风险。

结论

强化血压目标降低了 MACE 的发生率,并增加了其他不良事件的风险,但死亡率或肾脏结局没有显著变化。

相似文献

1
Intensive blood pressure control for patients aged over 60: A meta-analysis of the SPRINT, STEP, and ACCORD BP randomized controlled trials.强化血压控制对 60 岁以上患者的影响:SPRINT、STEP 和 ACCORD BP 随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Maturitas. 2023 Jun;172:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.04.009. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
2
Benefit and harm of intensive blood pressure treatment: Derivation and validation of risk models using data from the SPRINT and ACCORD trials.强化血压治疗的益处与危害:利用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)和控制糖尿病患者心血管风险行动(ACCORD)试验数据推导和验证风险模型
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 17;14(10):e1002410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002410. eCollection 2017 Oct.
3
Effectiveness of blood pressure-lowering treatment by the levels of baseline Framingham risk score: A post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).基于基线 Framingham 风险评分水平的降压治疗效果:SPRINT(收缩压干预试验)的事后分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Dec;21(12):1813-1820. doi: 10.1111/jch.13720. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
Blood Pressure Variability Predicts Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Trial.血压变异性预测慢性肾脏病不良事件和心血管结局:SPRINT 试验的事后分析。
Am J Hypertens. 2017 Dec 8;31(1):48-52. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpx128.
5
Orthostatic Hypotension, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Adverse Events: Results From SPRINT.直立性低血压、心血管结局和不良事件:SPRINT 的结果。
Hypertension. 2020 Mar;75(3):660-667. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14309. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
6
Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Patients with Evident Cardiovascular Disease: An Investigation Using the SPRINT Study Data.强化血压控制对有明显心血管疾病患者的影响:基于 SPRINT 研究数据的调查。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2019;17(3):298-306. doi: 10.2174/1570161116666180305160116.
7
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.
8
Individualising intensive systolic blood pressure reduction in hypertension using computational trial phenomaps and machine learning: a post-hoc analysis of randomised clinical trials.使用计算试验表型图谱和机器学习对高血压患者进行个体化强化收缩压降低治疗:随机临床试验的事后分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Nov;4(11):e796-e805. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00170-4.
9
Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Lowering on Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Standard Glycemic Control and in Those Without Diabetes Mellitus: Reconciling Results From ACCORD BP and SPRINT.强化收缩压降压治疗对标准血糖控制的 2 型糖尿病患者及无糖尿病患者心血管事件和死亡率的影响:来自 ACCORD BP 和 SPRINT 的结果再分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Sep 18;7(18):e009326. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009326.
10
Intensive Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Elderly Patients: A Secondary Analysis of SPRINT Study Based on a 60-Year Age Cutoff.强化血压控制与老年患者心血管结局:SPRINT 研究基于 60 岁年龄截点的二次分析。
Am J Hypertens. 2023 Aug 5;36(9):491-497. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad039.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial and ethnic differences in cardiometabolic predictors of white matter hyperintensities burden among males: The HABS-HD study.男性白质高信号负担的心脏代谢预测因素中的种族和民族差异:HABS-HD研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Aug 4:13872877251365128. doi: 10.1177/13872877251365128.
2
Is Intensive Blood Pressure Control Indicated in Older Patients with Hypertension?老年高血压患者是否需要强化血压控制?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Aug;26(8):783-787. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02080-z. Epub 2024 Jun 25.