Hypertension and Cardiometabolic Unit, First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2019;17(3):298-306. doi: 10.2174/1570161116666180305160116.
Recent data advocate adoption of a more intensive treatment strategy for management of blood pressure (BP).
We investigated whether the overall effects of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) are applicable to cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients.
In a post hoc analysis we analyzed data from SPRINT that randomly assigned 9361 individuals to a systolic BP (SBP) target of <120 mmHg (intensive treatment) or <140 mmHg (standard treatment). 1562 patients had clinically evident CVD (age=70.3±9.3 years, 24% females) at study entry and were followed for 3.1 years. Further, we assessed the effect of low (<150 mmHg) baseline SBP on outcome.
In CVD patients, there was no benefit from the intensive treatment regarding all endpoints, except for a marginally significant benefit on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 1.00; p=0.0509). Further, while there was no increase in serious adverse events (SAE) in the intensive group, there was increased risk for study-related SAE, acute renal failure and electrolyte abnormalities. In patients with low baseline SBP there was a beneficial effect on allcause mortality (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.96; p=0.033), but with greater stroke incidence (HR: 2.94; 95% CI: 1.04 to 8.29; p=0.042).
We confirm the beneficial effect of the intensive strategy in SPRINT study on all-cause mortality and the harmful effect on specific adverse outcomes in patients with CVD. However, in patients with low baseline SBP stroke may increase.
最近的数据提倡采用更强化的治疗策略来管理血压(BP)。
我们研究了 Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial(SPRINT)的总体效果是否适用于心血管疾病(CVD)患者。
在事后分析中,我们分析了 SPRINT 的数据,该数据将 9361 名患者随机分配至收缩压(SBP)目标值<120mmHg(强化治疗)或<140mmHg(标准治疗)。在研究开始时有 1562 名患者患有临床明显的 CVD(年龄=70.3±9.3 岁,24%为女性),随访 3.1 年。此外,我们评估了低(<150mmHg)基线 SBP 对结局的影响。
在 CVD 患者中,强化治疗在所有终点上均无获益,除了全因死亡率略有显著获益(风险比[HR]:0.67;95%置信区间[CI]:0.45 至 1.00;p=0.0509)。此外,强化治疗组严重不良事件(SAE)并未增加,但研究相关 SAE、急性肾衰竭和电解质异常的风险增加。在基线 SBP 较低的患者中,全因死亡率有获益(HR:0.56;95%CI:0.33 至 0.96;p=0.033),但中风发生率更高(HR:2.94;95%CI:1.04 至 8.29;p=0.042)。
我们证实了 SPRINT 研究中强化策略在全因死亡率上的有益效果,以及在 CVD 患者特定不良结局上的有害效果。然而,在基线 SBP 较低的患者中,中风的风险可能会增加。