Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Bachstr. 18, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 26;13(1):6840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33355-0.
The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) is a 5-item self-report measure that captures symptoms of anxiety and associated functional impairments. This study evaluates a German version (OASIS-D) that was administered to a convenience sample of 1398 primary care patients of whom 419 were diagnosed with panic disorder with/without agoraphobia. Psychometric properties were analyzed using classical test theory as well as probabilistic test theory. Factor analyses suggested a unitary (latent) factor structure. The internal consistency was good to excellent. Convergent as well as discriminant validity with other self-report measures was found. A sum score (range 0-20) of ≥ 8 emerged as optimal cut-score for screening purposes. A difference score of ≥ 5 was indicative of reliable individual change. A Rasch analysis of local item independence suggested response dependency between the first two items. Rasch analyses of measurement invariance detected noninvariant subgroups associated with age and gender. Analyses of validity and optimal cut-off score were solely based on self-report measures, which may have introduced method effects. In sum, the findings support the transcultural validity of the OASIS and indicate its applicability to naturalistic primary care settings. Caution is warranted when using the scale to compare groups that differ in age or gender.
总体焦虑严重程度和障碍量表(OASIS)是一个包含 5 个项目的自我报告量表,用于评估焦虑症状和相关的功能障碍。本研究评估了一个德语版本(OASIS-D),对 1398 名初级保健患者进行了便利抽样,其中 419 名被诊断为伴有/不伴有广场恐怖症的惊恐障碍。使用经典测试理论和概率测试理论分析了心理测量学特性。因子分析表明存在单一(潜在)因子结构。内部一致性良好到优秀。与其他自我报告量表的收敛和判别效度均得到验证。总分(范围 0-20)≥8 分作为筛查的最佳截断值。差值≥5 分表明个体变化可靠。局部项目独立性的 Rasch 分析表明前两个项目之间存在反应依赖性。对测量不变性的 Rasch 分析检测到与年龄和性别相关的非不变亚组。有效性和最佳截断值的分析仅基于自我报告量表,这可能引入了方法效应。总之,研究结果支持 OASIS 的跨文化有效性,并表明其在自然主义的初级保健环境中的适用性。在使用该量表比较年龄或性别不同的群体时需要谨慎。