• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种焦虑相关严重程度和损害的简短测量工具的验证:总体焦虑严重程度和损害量表(OASIS)。

Validation of a brief measure of anxiety-related severity and impairment: the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS).

作者信息

Campbell-Sills Laura, Norman Sonya B, Craske Michelle G, Sullivan Greer, Lang Ariel J, Chavira Denise A, Bystritsky Alexander, Sherbourne Cathy, Roy-Byrne Peter, Stein Murray B

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0603, USA.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2009 Jan;112(1-3):92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.014. Epub 2008 May 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.014
PMID:18486238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2629402/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) is a 5-item self-report measure that can be used to assess severity and impairment associated with any anxiety disorder or multiple anxiety disorders. A prior investigation with a nonclinical sample supported the reliability and validity of the OASIS; however, to date it has not been validated for use in clinical samples.

METHODS

The present study assessed the psychometric properties of the OASIS in a large sample (N=1036) of primary care patients whose physicians referred them to an anxiety disorders treatment study. Latent structure, internal consistency, convergent/discriminant validity, and cut-score analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a unidimensional structure. The five OASIS items displayed strong loadings on the single factor and had a high degree of internal consistency. OASIS scores demonstrated robust correlations with global and disorder-specific measures of anxiety, and weak correlations with measures of unrelated constructs. A cut-score of 8 correctly classified 87% of this sample as having an anxiety diagnosis or not.

LIMITATIONS

Convergent validity measures consisted solely of other self-report measures of anxiety. Future studies should evaluate the convergence of OASIS scores with clinician-rated and behavioral measures of anxiety severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this investigation suggests that the OASIS is a valid instrument for measurement of anxiety severity and impairment in clinical samples. Its brevity and applicability to a wide range of anxiety disorders enhance its utility as a screening and assessment tool.

摘要

背景

总体焦虑严重程度与功能损害量表(OASIS)是一种包含5个条目的自我报告量表,可用于评估与任何一种焦虑症或多种焦虑症相关的严重程度和功能损害。先前对非临床样本的一项调查支持了OASIS的信效度;然而,迄今为止,它尚未在临床样本中得到验证。

方法

本研究在一个由医生转介至焦虑症治疗研究的初级保健患者大样本(N = 1036)中评估了OASIS的心理测量特性。进行了潜在结构、内部一致性、聚合/区分效度和划界分数分析。

结果

探索性和验证性因素分析支持单维结构。OASIS的5个条目在单一因素上显示出很强的负荷,并且具有高度的内部一致性。OASIS得分与焦虑的总体和特定障碍测量指标显示出很强的相关性,与无关构念的测量指标相关性较弱。划界分数为8时,能正确地将该样本中87%的患者分类为患有或未患有焦虑症。

局限性

聚合效度测量仅由其他焦虑的自我报告量表组成。未来的研究应评估OASIS得分与临床医生评定的焦虑严重程度和行为测量指标的一致性。

结论

总体而言,本研究表明OASIS是一种用于测量临床样本中焦虑严重程度和功能损害的有效工具。其简短性以及对广泛焦虑症的适用性增强了其作为筛查和评估工具的效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb9/2629402/dfd1a3ac2a22/nihms82959f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb9/2629402/dfd1a3ac2a22/nihms82959f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb9/2629402/dfd1a3ac2a22/nihms82959f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a brief measure of anxiety-related severity and impairment: the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS).一种焦虑相关严重程度和损害的简短测量工具的验证:总体焦虑严重程度和损害量表(OASIS)。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Jan;112(1-3):92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.014. Epub 2008 May 16.
2
A Dutch version of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS): Psychometric properties and validation.《总体焦虑严重程度和损害量表》(OASIS)的荷兰语版本:心理测量特性与验证
J Affect Disord. 2015 Feb 1;172:127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.033. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
3
Psychometric properties of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) among psychiatric outpatients.精神科门诊患者中总体焦虑严重程度和功能损害量表(OASIS)的心理测量特性。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Sep 1;201:112-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 10.
4
A brief online transdiagnostic measure: Psychometric properties of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) among Spanish patients with emotional disorders.一种简短的跨诊断在线测量工具:西班牙情绪障碍患者中整体焦虑严重程度和障碍量表(OASIS)的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206516. eCollection 2018.
5
Psychometrics of a brief measure of anxiety to detect severity and impairment: the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS).一种用于检测严重程度和损害的简短焦虑测量的心理计量学:总体焦虑严重程度和损害量表(OASIS)。
J Psychiatr Res. 2011 Feb;45(2):262-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.06.011. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
6
Development and validation of an Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS).总体焦虑严重程度与功能损害量表(OASIS)的编制与验证
Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(4):245-9. doi: 10.1002/da.20182.
7
Psychometric evaluation and Rasch analyses of the German Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS-D).德国总体焦虑严重程度和障碍量表(OASIS-D)的心理计量学评估和 Rasch 分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 26;13(1):6840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33355-0.
8
A Czech version of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS): standardization and psychometric properties.《总体焦虑严重程度和障碍量表(OASIS)的捷克语版本:标准化和心理测量特性》。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 23;22(1):822. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04365-5.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS) in individuals seeking outpatient specialty treatment for anxiety-related disorders.总体焦虑严重程度和障碍量表(OASIS)在寻求焦虑相关障碍门诊专科治疗的个体中的心理测量评估。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Apr 1;175:463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.041. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
10
[Evaluation of worry: validation of a French translation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire].[担忧评估:宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2001 Sep-Oct;27(5):475-84.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the effect of homework engagement in group cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders and depression?在焦虑症和抑郁症的团体认知行为疗法中,作业投入有什么效果?
BMC Psychol. 2025 Sep 2;13(1):1002. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03167-0.
2
Clinical and Cognitive Improvement Following Treatment with a Hemp-Derived, Full-Spectrum, High-Cannabidiol Product in Patients with Anxiety: An Open-Label Pilot Study.焦虑症患者使用大麻衍生的全谱、高大麻二酚产品治疗后的临床和认知改善:一项开放标签的试点研究。
Biomedicines. 2025 Aug 1;13(8):1874. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13081874.
3
Behavioral engagement patterns and psychosocial outcomes in web-based interpretation bias training for anxiety.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward a Unified Treatment for Emotional Disorders - Republished Article.迈向情绪障碍的统一治疗——重新发表的文章。
Behav Ther. 2016 Nov;47(6):838-853. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
2
Social fears and social phobia in the USA: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.美国的社交恐惧与社交恐惧症:全国共病调查复制研究的结果
Psychol Med. 2008 Jan;38(1):15-28. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707001699. Epub 2007 Nov 2.
3
Design of the Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (CALM) study: innovations in collaborative care for anxiety disorders.
基于网络的焦虑症解释偏差训练中的行为参与模式和心理社会结果
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jul 24;4(7):e0000945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000945. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Brief group adaptation of the Unified Protocol for integrated primary care: Open trial of a transdiagnostic intervention delivered via telehealth.综合初级保健统一方案的简短小组适应性调整:通过远程医疗提供的跨诊断干预开放试验。
Psychol Serv. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1037/ser0000983.
5
Driven by rewards or punishments? Understanding real world social functioning in anxiety and depressive disorders.受奖惩驱动?理解焦虑和抑郁障碍中的现实世界社交功能。
J Mood Anxiety Disord. 2024 Dec 7;9:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.xjmad.2024.100097. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs (CuidaSM): evidence of validity in primary health care.巴西精神卫生保健需求评估量表(CuidaSM):初级卫生保健中的效度证据
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 10;20(7):e0323833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323833. eCollection 2025.
7
Bulimia nervosa severity levels based on shape/weight overvaluation explain more variance in clinical characteristics than DSM-5 severity levels.基于对体型/体重的过度重视划分的神经性贪食症严重程度等级,相较于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)的严重程度等级,能解释更多临床特征方面的差异。
Psychol Med. 2025 Jun 30;55:e181. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725100597.
8
Holistic Patient-Centered Outcomes in Post-Acute Kidney Injury Care: Physical, Emotional, Cognitive, and Social Outcomes.急性肾损伤后护理中的整体以患者为中心的结局:身体、情感、认知和社会结局。
Adv Kidney Dis Health. 2025 Mar;32(2):162-178. doi: 10.1053/j.akdh.2024.10.001.
9
Directed exploration is reduced by an aversive interoceptive state induction in healthy individuals but not in those with affective disorders.在健康个体中,厌恶的内感受状态诱导会减少定向探索,但在情感障碍患者中则不会。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 5. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-02980-8.
10
Patient-reported outcome measures for paediatric gender-affirming care: A systematic review.儿童性别肯定治疗的患者报告结局指标:一项系统评价。
Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Jul 24;29(8):514-527. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxae019. eCollection 2024 Dec.
协同焦虑学习与管理(CALM)研究的设计:焦虑症协作护理的创新
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Sep-Oct;29(5):379-87. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.04.005.
4
Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection.基层医疗中的焦虑症:患病率、损害、共病情况及检测
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 6;146(5):317-25. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004.
5
Disability and poor quality of life associated with comorbid anxiety disorders and physical conditions.与共病焦虑症和身体状况相关的残疾和生活质量低下。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Oct 23;166(19):2109-16. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.19.2109.
6
Development and validation of an Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS).总体焦虑严重程度与功能损害量表(OASIS)的编制与验证
Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(4):245-9. doi: 10.1002/da.20182.
7
The epidemiology of panic attacks, panic disorder, and agoraphobia in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.全国共病调查复制研究中惊恐发作、惊恐障碍和场所恐惧症的流行病学
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;63(4):415-24. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.4.415.
8
Generalized anxiety disorder severity scale (GADSS): a preliminary validation study.广泛性焦虑障碍严重程度量表(GADSS):一项初步验证研究。
Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(2):77-82. doi: 10.1002/da.20149.
9
Functional impact and health utility of anxiety disorders in primary care outpatients.基层医疗门诊患者焦虑症的功能影响与健康效用
Med Care. 2005 Dec;43(12):1164-70. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000185750.18119.fd.
10
Reliability of the self-report version of the panic disorder severity scale.惊恐障碍严重程度量表自我报告版本的信度
Depress Anxiety. 2002;15(4):183-5. doi: 10.1002/da.10049.