Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
First Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, 813 72 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 30;18(19):10337. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910337.
Short and effective tools for measuring depression, anxiety and their resulting impairments are lacking in the Czech language. The abbreviated versions of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) show very good psychometric properties in English and other languages, and can be used in different settings for research or clinical purposes. The aim of this study was the psychometric evaluation and validation of the Czech versions of the abbreviated forms of both tools in the general population. A nationally representative sample of 2912 participants (age = 48.88, = 15.56; 55% female) was used. The non-parametric testing of the differences between sociodemographic groups revealed a higher level of anxiety and depression in students, females and religious respondents. Confirmatory Factor Analysis suggested a good fit for the unidimensional model of the OASIS: (4) = 38.28; < 0.001; = 0.999; = 0.997; = 0.078; = 0.027 and the ODSIS: (4) = 36.54; < 0.001; = 0.999; = 0.999; = 0.076; = 0.021 with the data. Both scales had an excellent internal consistency (OASIS: Cronbach's alpha = 0.95, McDonald's omega = 0.95 and ODSIS: Cronbach's alpha = 0.95, McDonald's omega = 0.95). A clinical cut-off of 15 was identified for the OASIS and a cut-off of 12 for the ODSIS. The study showed good validity for both scales. The Czech versions of the abbreviated OASIS and ODSIS were short and valid instruments for measuring anxiety and depression.
在捷克语中，缺乏用于测量抑郁、焦虑及其影响的简短而有效的工具。总体焦虑严重程度和损伤量表（OASIS）和总体抑郁严重程度和损伤量表（ODSIS）的缩写版本在英语和其他语言中具有很好的心理测量学特性，可用于研究或临床目的的不同环境。本研究的目的是在普通人群中对这两种工具的缩写形式的捷克语版本进行心理测量学评估和验证。使用了一个具有全国代表性的 2912 名参与者样本（年龄=48.88，=15.56；55%为女性）。对社会人口统计学群体之间差异的非参数检验表明，学生、女性和宗教答卷者的焦虑和抑郁程度更高。验证性因素分析表明，OASIS 的单维模型拟合良好：（4）=38.28；<0.001；=0.999；=0.999；=0.078；=0.027，ODSIS：（4）=36.54；<0.001；=0.999；=0.999；=0.076；=0.021。两个量表的内部一致性都非常好（OASIS：Cronbach's alpha=0.95，McDonald's omega=0.95，ODSIS：Cronbach's alpha=0.95，McDonald's omega=0.95）。OASIS 的临床截断值为 15，ODSIS 的截断值为 12。该研究表明，这两个量表都具有良好的有效性。OASIS 和 ODSIS 的捷克语缩写版本是用于测量焦虑和抑郁的简短有效的工具。
