Faculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 26;23(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05582-w.
There is little research examining transnational prenatal care (TPC) (i.e., prenatal care in more than one country) among migrant women. Using data from the Migrant-Friendly Maternity Care (MFMC) - Montreal project, we aimed to: (1) Estimate the prevalence of TPC, including TPC-arrived during pregnancy and TPC-arrived pre-pregnancy, among recently-arrived migrant women from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) who gave birth in Montreal, Canada; (2) Describe and compare the socio-demographic, migration and health profiles and perceptions of care during pregnancy in Canada between these two groups and migrant women who received no TPC (i.e., only received prenatal care in Canada); and (3) Identify predictors of TPC-arrived pre-pregnancy vs. No-TPC.
The MFMC study used a cross-sectional design. Data were gathered from recently-arrived (< 8 years) migrant women from LMICs via medical record review and interview-administration of the MFMC questionnaire postpartum during the period of March 2014-January 2015 in three hospitals, and February-June 2015 in one hospital. We conducted a secondary analysis (n = 2595 women); descriptive analyses (objectives 1 & 2) and multivariable logistic regression (objective 3).
Ten percent of women received TPC; 6% arrived during pregnancy and 4% were in Canada pre-pregnancy. The women who received TPC and arrived during pregnancy were disadvantaged compared to women in the other two groups (TPC-arrived pre-pregnancy and No-TPC women), in terms of income level, migration status, French and English language abilities, access barriers to care and healthcare coverage. However, they also had a higher proportion of economic migrants and they were generally healthier compared to No-TPC women. Predictors of TPC-arrived pre-pregnancy included: 'Not living with the father of the baby' (AOR = 4.8, 95%CI 2.4, 9.8), 'having negative perceptions of pregnancy care in Canada (general experiences)' (AOR = 1.2, 95%CI 1.1, 1.3) and younger maternal age (AOR = 1.1, 95%CI 1.0, 1.1).
Women with more capacity may self-select to migrate during pregnancy which results in TPC; these women, however, are disadvantaged upon arrival, and may need additional care. Already-migrated women may use TPC due to a need for family and social support and/or because they prefer the healthcare in their home country.
关于移民女性的跨国产前护理(TPC,即在一个以上国家进行的产前护理),研究甚少。利用来自移民友好型产妇保健(MFMC)-蒙特利尔项目的数据,我们旨在:(1)估计最近来自中低收入国家(LMIC)、在加拿大蒙特利尔分娩的移民女性中 TPC 的流行率,包括妊娠期间到达的 TPC 和妊娠前到达的 TPC;(2)描述和比较这两组与未接受 TPC(即仅在加拿大接受产前护理)的移民女性在妊娠期间的社会人口统计学、移民和健康状况以及对护理的看法;(3)确定妊娠前到达 TPC 与无 TPC 的预测因素。
MFMC 研究采用了横断面设计。通过医疗记录审查和产后在三家医院(2014 年 3 月至 2015 年 1 月)和一家医院(2015 年 2 月至 6 月)期间使用 MFMC 问卷进行访谈管理,收集最近来自 LMIC 的移民女性(<8 年)的数据。我们进行了二次分析(n=2595 名女性);描述性分析(目标 1 和 2)和多变量逻辑回归(目标 3)。
10%的女性接受了 TPC;6%在妊娠期间到达,4%在加拿大妊娠前到达。与其他两组(妊娠期间到达 TPC 组和无 TPC 组)相比,接受 TPC 并在妊娠期间到达的女性在收入水平、移民身份、法语和英语能力、获得护理的障碍和医疗保健覆盖方面处于不利地位。然而,他们也有更高比例的经济移民,而且与无 TPC 女性相比,他们的总体健康状况也更好。妊娠前到达 TPC 的预测因素包括:“与婴儿的父亲不住在一起”(AOR=4.8,95%CI 2.4,9.8)、“对加拿大妊娠护理的看法负面(一般体验)”(AOR=1.2,95%CI 1.1,1.3)和较年轻的母亲年龄(AOR=1.1,95%CI 1.0,1.1)。
能力较强的妇女可能会选择在妊娠期间移民,从而导致 TPC;然而,这些妇女在到达时处于不利地位,可能需要额外的护理。已经移民的妇女可能会因为需要家庭和社会支持,或者因为他们更喜欢自己国家的医疗保健而使用 TPC。