Suppr超能文献

跨国产前护理:来自中低收入国家的移民妇女在加拿大蒙特利尔分娩。

Transnational prenatal care among migrant women from low-and-middle-income countries who gave birth in Montreal, Canada.

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.

Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 26;23(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05582-w.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is little research examining transnational prenatal care (TPC) (i.e., prenatal care in more than one country) among migrant women. Using data from the Migrant-Friendly Maternity Care (MFMC) - Montreal project, we aimed to: (1) Estimate the prevalence of TPC, including TPC-arrived during pregnancy and TPC-arrived pre-pregnancy, among recently-arrived migrant women from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) who gave birth in Montreal, Canada; (2) Describe and compare the socio-demographic, migration and health profiles and perceptions of care during pregnancy in Canada between these two groups and migrant women who received no TPC (i.e., only received prenatal care in Canada); and (3) Identify predictors of TPC-arrived pre-pregnancy vs. No-TPC.

METHODS

The MFMC study used a cross-sectional design. Data were gathered from recently-arrived (< 8 years) migrant women from LMICs via medical record review and interview-administration of the MFMC questionnaire postpartum during the period of March 2014-January 2015 in three hospitals, and February-June 2015 in one hospital. We conducted a secondary analysis (n = 2595 women); descriptive analyses (objectives 1 & 2) and multivariable logistic regression (objective 3).

RESULTS

Ten percent of women received TPC; 6% arrived during pregnancy and 4% were in Canada pre-pregnancy. The women who received TPC and arrived during pregnancy were disadvantaged compared to women in the other two groups (TPC-arrived pre-pregnancy and No-TPC women), in terms of income level, migration status, French and English language abilities, access barriers to care and healthcare coverage. However, they also had a higher proportion of economic migrants and they were generally healthier compared to No-TPC women. Predictors of TPC-arrived pre-pregnancy included: 'Not living with the father of the baby' (AOR = 4.8, 95%CI 2.4, 9.8), 'having negative perceptions of pregnancy care in Canada (general experiences)' (AOR = 1.2, 95%CI 1.1, 1.3) and younger maternal age (AOR = 1.1, 95%CI 1.0, 1.1).

CONCLUSION

Women with more capacity may self-select to migrate during pregnancy which results in TPC; these women, however, are disadvantaged upon arrival, and may need additional care. Already-migrated women may use TPC due to a need for family and social support and/or because they prefer the healthcare in their home country.

摘要

目的

关于移民女性的跨国产前护理(TPC,即在一个以上国家进行的产前护理),研究甚少。利用来自移民友好型产妇保健(MFMC)-蒙特利尔项目的数据,我们旨在:(1)估计最近来自中低收入国家(LMIC)、在加拿大蒙特利尔分娩的移民女性中 TPC 的流行率,包括妊娠期间到达的 TPC 和妊娠前到达的 TPC;(2)描述和比较这两组与未接受 TPC(即仅在加拿大接受产前护理)的移民女性在妊娠期间的社会人口统计学、移民和健康状况以及对护理的看法;(3)确定妊娠前到达 TPC 与无 TPC 的预测因素。

方法

MFMC 研究采用了横断面设计。通过医疗记录审查和产后在三家医院(2014 年 3 月至 2015 年 1 月)和一家医院(2015 年 2 月至 6 月)期间使用 MFMC 问卷进行访谈管理,收集最近来自 LMIC 的移民女性(<8 年)的数据。我们进行了二次分析(n=2595 名女性);描述性分析(目标 1 和 2)和多变量逻辑回归(目标 3)。

结果

10%的女性接受了 TPC;6%在妊娠期间到达,4%在加拿大妊娠前到达。与其他两组(妊娠期间到达 TPC 组和无 TPC 组)相比,接受 TPC 并在妊娠期间到达的女性在收入水平、移民身份、法语和英语能力、获得护理的障碍和医疗保健覆盖方面处于不利地位。然而,他们也有更高比例的经济移民,而且与无 TPC 女性相比,他们的总体健康状况也更好。妊娠前到达 TPC 的预测因素包括:“与婴儿的父亲不住在一起”(AOR=4.8,95%CI 2.4,9.8)、“对加拿大妊娠护理的看法负面(一般体验)”(AOR=1.2,95%CI 1.1,1.3)和较年轻的母亲年龄(AOR=1.1,95%CI 1.0,1.1)。

结论

能力较强的妇女可能会选择在妊娠期间移民,从而导致 TPC;然而,这些妇女在到达时处于不利地位,可能需要额外的护理。已经移民的妇女可能会因为需要家庭和社会支持,或者因为他们更喜欢自己国家的医疗保健而使用 TPC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ed3/10131434/1cf2eb23f2a7/12884_2023_5582_Figa_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验