Stackhouse Ashlyn A, Rafi Damir, Walls Risheka, Dodd Rebecca V, Badger Kerry, Davies Daniel J, Brown Celia A, Cowell Adrian, Meeran Karim, Halse Omid, Kinross James, Lupton Martin, Hughes Elizabeth A, Sam Amir H
Imperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Apr 20;14:373-380. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S391816. eCollection 2023.
This study compared knowledge attainment and student enjoyment and engagement between clinical case vignette, patient-testimony videos and mixed reality (MR) teaching via the Microsoft HoloLens 2, all delivered remotely to third year medical students. The feasibility of conducting MR teaching on a large scale was also assessed.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Medical students in Year 3 at Imperial College London participated in three online teaching sessions, one in each format. All students were expected to attend these scheduled teaching sessions and to complete the formative assessment. Inclusion of their data used as part of the research trial was optional.
The primary outcome measure was performance on a formative assessment, which served to compare knowledge attainment between three forms of online learning. Moreover, we aimed to explore student engagement with each form of learning via a questionnaire, and also feasibility of applying MR as a teaching tool on a large scale. Comparisons between performances on the formative assessment between the three groups were investigated using a repeated measures two-way ANOVA. Engagement and enjoyment were also analysed in the same manner.
A total of 252 students participated in the study. Knowledge attainment of students using MR was comparable with the other two methods. Participants reported higher enjoyment and engagement (p<0.001) for the case vignette method, compared with MR and video-based teaching. There was no difference in enjoyment or engagement ratings between MR and the video-based methods.
This study demonstrated that the implementation of MR is an effective, acceptable, and feasible way of teaching clinical medicine to undergraduate students on a large scale. However, case-based tutorials were found to be favoured most by students. Future work could further explore the best uses for MR teaching within the medical curriculum.
本研究比较了临床病例 vignette、患者证言视频以及通过 Microsoft HoloLens 2 进行的混合现实(MR)教学(所有教学均远程提供给三年级医学生)之间的知识获取情况、学生的学习体验和参与度。同时还评估了大规模开展 MR 教学的可行性。
伦敦帝国理工学院三年级医学生参加了三次在线教学课程,每种形式各一次。所有学生都应参加这些预定的教学课程并完成形成性评估。将他们的数据纳入研究试验作为一部分是可选的。
主要结局指标是形成性评估的表现,用于比较三种在线学习形式之间的知识获取情况。此外,我们旨在通过问卷调查探索学生对每种学习形式的参与度,以及将 MR 作为教学工具大规模应用的可行性。使用重复测量双向方差分析研究三组之间形成性评估表现的差异。参与度和学习体验也以相同方式进行分析。
共有 252 名学生参与了该研究。使用 MR 的学生的知识获取情况与其他两种方法相当。与 MR 和基于视频的教学相比,参与者报告称病例 vignette 方法的学习体验和参与度更高(p<0.001)。MR 和基于视频的方法在学习体验或参与度评分方面没有差异。
本研究表明,实施 MR 是一种大规模向本科生教授临床医学的有效、可接受且可行的方式。然而,发现基于案例的教程最受学生青睐。未来的工作可以进一步探索 MR 教学在医学课程中的最佳应用。