Akbari Hadi, Kuwano Satoshi, Shimokochi Yohei
Department of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.
Faculty of Business Information Science, Jobu University, Gunma, Japan.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Apr 17;11(4):23259671231164706. doi: 10.1177/23259671231164706. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Research has demonstrated that performing a secondary task during a drop vertical jump (DVJ) may affect landing kinetics and kinematics.
To examine the differences in the trunk and lower extremity biomechanics associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk factors between a standard DVJ and a DVJ while heading a soccer ball (header DVJ).
Descriptive laboratory study.
Participants comprised 24 college-level soccer players (18 female and 6 male; mean ± SD age, 20.04 ± 1.12 years; height, 165.75 ± 7.25 cm; weight, 60.95 ± 8.47 kg). Each participant completed a standard DVJ and a header DVJ, and biomechanics were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system and force plate. The difference (Δ) in 3-dimensional trunk, hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics between the tasks was analyzed. In addition, for each biomechanical variable, the correlation between the data from the 2 tasks was calculated.
Compared to the standard DVJ, performing the header DVJ led to significantly reduced peak knee flexion angle (Δ = 5.35°; = .002), knee flexion displacement (Δ = 3.89°; = .015), hip flexion angle at initial contact (Δ = -2.84°; = .001), peak trunk flexion angle (Δ = 13.11°; = .006), and center of mass vertical displacement (Δ = -0.02m; = .010), and increased peak anterior tibial shear force (Δ = -0.72 N/kg; = .020), trunk lateral flexion angle at initial contact (Δ = 1.55°; < .0001), peak trunk lateral flexion angle (Δ = 1.34°; = .003), knee joint stiffness (Δ = 0.002 N*m/kg/deg; = .017), and leg stiffness (Δ = 8.46 N/kg/m; = .046) compared to those in standard DVJs. In addition, individuals' data for these variables were highly and positively correlated between conditions ( = 0.632-0.908; < .001).
The header DVJ task showed kinetic and kinematic parameters that suggested increased risk of ACL injury as compared with the standard DVJ task.
Athletes may benefit from acquiring the ability to safely perform header DVJs to prevent ACL injury. To simulate real-time competition situations, coaches and athletic trainers should incorporate such dual tasks in ACL injury prevention programs.
研究表明,在垂直纵跳(DVJ)过程中执行第二项任务可能会影响着陆动力学和运动学。
研究标准DVJ与头球DVJ(即边踢足球边进行垂直纵跳)之间与前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤风险因素相关的躯干和下肢生物力学差异。
描述性实验室研究。
参与者包括24名大学水平的足球运动员(18名女性和6名男性;平均年龄±标准差为20.04±1.12岁;身高165.75±7.25厘米;体重60.95±8.47千克)。每位参与者完成一次标准DVJ和一次头球DVJ,并使用电磁跟踪系统和测力台记录生物力学数据。分析两项任务之间三维躯干、髋、膝和踝关节生物力学的差异(Δ)。此外,针对每个生物力学变量,计算两项任务数据之间的相关性。
与标准DVJ相比,进行头球DVJ时,膝关节最大屈曲角度显著减小(Δ = 5.35°;P = 0.002),膝关节屈曲位移减小(Δ = 3.89°;P = 0.015),初始接触时髋关节屈曲角度减小(Δ = -2.84°;P = 0.001),躯干最大屈曲角度减小(Δ = 13.11°;P = 0.006),质心垂直位移减小(Δ = -0.02米;P = 0.010),而胫骨前向最大剪切力增加(Δ = -0.72牛/千克;P = 0.020),初始接触时躯干侧屈角度增加(Δ = 1.55°;P < 0.0001),躯干最大侧屈角度增加(Δ = 1.34°;P = 0.003),膝关节刚度增加(Δ = 0.002牛·米/千克/度;P = 0.017),腿部刚度增加(Δ = 8.46牛/千克/米;P = 0.046)。此外,这些变量在不同条件下个体的数据高度正相关(r = 0.632 - 0.908;P < 0.001)。
与标准DVJ任务相比,头球DVJ任务的动力学和运动学参数表明ACL损伤风险增加。
运动员若能安全地进行头球DVJ,可能有助于预防ACL损伤。为模拟实时比赛情况,教练和运动训练师应将此类双重任务纳入ACL损伤预防计划中。