Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Apr-Jun;23(2):157-162. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_514_22.
This study aims to evaluate and compare the knowledge of prosthodontic diagnostic aids among interns and postgraduates.
A questionnaire survey was conducted to assess and compare the knowledge of prosthodontic diagnostic aids among interns and postgraduates. Based on the pilot study with alpha error 5% and a power of study 80%, the sample size was estimated to be 858 for each group.
The self constructed questionnaire consisted of 3 sections, of which each section had 5 questions, a total of 15 questions validated by a team of 6 experts. The questionnaire was distributed electronically among interns and postgraduates in various dental colleges across India. Data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis.
All outcomes of this survey were analyzed using an independent t test. The Mann- Whitney test was used to determine the significance of two groups.
From the results obtained, it was found that interns (mean: 6.90; standard deviation: 2.442) had less knowledge regarding diagnostic tools than postgraduate students (mean: 8.76; standard deviation: 1.818).
Diagnostic aids simplifies the process of diagnosis and treatment planning. Moreover, the knowledge of diagnostic aids among younger generation permits them to redefine the way dentistry is practiced and at the same time helps to provide better treatment results and achieve the utmost for the profession. Adequate knowledge of diagnostic aids is the need of the hour. Dental professionals should constantly update knowledge regarding various diagnostic aids in Prosthodontics, so as to arrive at optimum diagnosis and treatment plan with longer prognosis.
本研究旨在评估和比较实习医生和研究生对修复诊断辅助工具的知识掌握情况。
采用问卷调查的方法评估和比较实习医生和研究生对修复诊断辅助工具的知识掌握情况。根据具有 5%α误差和 80%研究能力的初步研究,估计每组的样本量为 858 例。
自行设计的问卷分为 3 个部分,每个部分有 5 个问题,共 15 个问题,由 6 名专家组成的团队进行验证。问卷通过电子方式分发给印度各牙科学院的实习医生和研究生。收集数据并进行统计分析。
本调查的所有结果均采用独立 t 检验进行分析。采用 Mann-Whitney 检验确定两组之间的显著性。
从结果中发现,实习医生(平均值:6.90;标准差:2.442)对诊断工具的了解少于研究生(平均值:8.76;标准差:1.818)。
诊断辅助工具简化了诊断和治疗计划的过程。此外,年轻一代对诊断辅助工具的了解使他们能够重新定义牙医的实践方式,同时有助于提供更好的治疗效果,并为该专业取得最大成就。充分了解诊断辅助工具是当前的需要。牙科专业人员应不断更新有关修复学中各种诊断辅助工具的知识,以便做出最佳诊断和治疗计划,获得更长的预后。