University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Aug;38(15-16):9395-9422. doi: 10.1177/08862605231165778. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
Few bystander intervention trainings programs have evaluated behavioral outcomes in previously trained upper-level undergraduate students. Rigorous study designs are necessary to understand how multi-topic programs influence student outcomes to intervene against sexual violence, racism, and high-risk alcohol situations. A single-session bystander training for emphasizing communication strategies was developed for juniors and seniors on a private, Midwestern college campus. The training addressed sexual violence, racism, and high-risk alcohol situations and was evaluated using a randomized waitlist-control design in student-housing units. Online Qualtrics surveys were completed by 101 student participants (57 in the intervention group and 44 in the control group). Students responded to nine harm scenarios involving sexual violence, racism, and high-risk alcohol situations at baseline and 7 weeks follow-up. Between-group changes in scores were compared to determine the effect of the program on students' (a) readiness to intervene; (b) confidence to intervene; (c) bystander behaviors among students who witnessed actual or potentially harmful events; and (d) bystander reports of their experiences. Qualitative analysis assessed how the program influenced the use of positive verbal communication strategies. Program effects increased positive bystander experiences when helping someone who had too much to drink and needed assistance. Over time both groups reported increased confidence levels to intervene when someone intoxicated was being isolated with sexual intent. There were no further significant findings in readiness, confidence, behaviors, or other experiences, though some positive nonsignificant trends emerged. The program demonstrated little efficacy. Results suggest opportunities to improve bystander outcomes in low-risk primary prevention situations and racist scenarios, suggesting that targeted intervention of these outcomes may be useful when developing programming with previously-trained students. As universities expand prevention work beyond the first year, lessons learned may help inform multi-year programming across health topics to prevent harm and create healthier college campuses.
鲜有旁观者干预培训项目评估过先前受过培训的高年级本科生的行为结果。为了了解多主题项目如何影响学生干预性暴力、种族主义和高风险酒精情况的结果,必须采用严格的研究设计。为一所私立中西部大学校园的大三和大四学生制定了一项强调沟通策略的单次旁观者培训。该培训针对性暴力、种族主义和高风险酒精情况,并在学生宿舍单元中使用随机候补对照设计进行评估。101 名学生参与者(干预组 57 名,对照组 44 名)在线完成了 Qualtrics 调查。学生在基线和 7 周随访时对涉及性暴力、种族主义和高风险酒精情况的 9 个伤害情景做出回应。比较组间分数变化,以确定该计划对学生(a)干预准备情况;(b)干预信心;(c)目睹实际或潜在有害事件的学生的旁观者行为;(d)旁观者报告其经历的影响。定性分析评估了该计划如何影响积极的口头沟通策略的使用。当帮助喝醉酒且需要帮助的人时,该计划增加了积极的旁观者体验。随着时间的推移,两个组都报告说,当有人因醉酒而被孤立并带有性意图时,干预的信心水平有所提高。在准备情况、信心、行为或其他经历方面没有进一步的显著发现,尽管出现了一些积极的非显著趋势。该计划效果甚微。结果表明,在低风险的初级预防情况下和种族主义场景中,改善旁观者结果的机会,表明在针对这些结果进行有针对性的干预时,可能对之前受过培训的学生开展编程有用。随着大学将预防工作扩展到第一年以外,所吸取的经验教训可能有助于为预防伤害和创建更健康的大学校园提供跨健康主题的多年编程。