• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦成年人群中自我报告的助听器使用模式

Self-Reported Hearing-Aid Use Patterns in an Adult Danish Population.

作者信息

Narayanan Sreeram K, Houmøller Sabina S, Wolff Anne, Lund Katja, Möller Sören, Hougaard Dan D, Gaihede Michael, Schmidt Jesper H, Hammershøi Dorte

机构信息

Section for AI and Sound, Department of Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.

Research Unit for ORL-Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, 5230 Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Audiol Res. 2023 Mar 27;13(2):221-235. doi: 10.3390/audiolres13020021.

DOI:10.3390/audiolres13020021
PMID:37102771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10135679/
Abstract

The retrospective reporting of users' hearing aid (HA) usage can provide insight into individualized HA usage patterns. Understanding these HA usage patterns can help to provide a tailored solution to meet the usage needs of HA users. This study aims to understand the HA usage pattern in daily-life situations from self-reported data and to examine its relationship to self-reported outcomes. A total of 1537 participants who responded to questions related to situations where they always took off or put on the HAs were included in the study. A latent class analysis was performed to stratify the HA users according to their HA usage pattern. The results showed distinct usage patterns in the latent classes derived for both scenarios. The demographics, socio-economic indicators, hearing loss, and user-related factors were found to impact HA usage. The results showed that the HA users who reported using the HAs all the time (regular users) had better self-reported HA outcomes than situational users, situational non-users, and non-users. The study explained the underlying distinct HA usage pattern from self-reported questionnaires using latent class analysis. The results emphasized the importance of regular use of HAs for a better self-reported HA outcome.

摘要

用户对助听器(HA)使用情况的回顾性报告能够提供对个性化HA使用模式的洞察。了解这些HA使用模式有助于提供量身定制的解决方案,以满足HA用户的使用需求。本研究旨在从自我报告的数据中了解日常生活情况下的HA使用模式,并检验其与自我报告结果的关系。共有1537名回答了与他们总是摘下或佩戴HA的情况相关问题的参与者被纳入研究。进行了潜在类别分析,以根据HA使用模式对HA用户进行分层。结果显示,在两种情况下得出的潜在类别中存在不同的使用模式。研究发现,人口统计学、社会经济指标、听力损失和与用户相关的因素会影响HA的使用。结果表明,报告一直使用HA的用户(常规用户)在自我报告的HA结果方面比情境用户、情境非用户和非用户更好。该研究使用潜在类别分析从自我报告问卷中解释了潜在的不同HA使用模式。结果强调了定期使用HA对于获得更好的自我报告HA结果的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ba/10135679/cdc67952b266/audiolres-13-00021-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ba/10135679/531b8d9a7051/audiolres-13-00021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ba/10135679/4fbb3dd0735b/audiolres-13-00021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ba/10135679/606371884375/audiolres-13-00021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ba/10135679/cdc67952b266/audiolres-13-00021-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ba/10135679/531b8d9a7051/audiolres-13-00021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ba/10135679/4fbb3dd0735b/audiolres-13-00021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ba/10135679/606371884375/audiolres-13-00021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ba/10135679/cdc67952b266/audiolres-13-00021-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-Reported Hearing-Aid Use Patterns in an Adult Danish Population.丹麦成年人群中自我报告的助听器使用模式
Audiol Res. 2023 Mar 27;13(2):221-235. doi: 10.3390/audiolres13020021.
2
Patterns of hearing aid usage predict hearing aid use amount (data logged and self-reported) and overreport.助听器使用模式可预测助听器使用量(数据记录和自我报告)及报告过度情况。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Feb;25(2):187-98. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.25.2.7.
3
Adapting to New Hearing Aids and Hearing Aid Adjustments in Adult Danish Users.成人丹麦使用者适应新助听器和助听器调整。
Am J Audiol. 2023 Sep 6;32(3):526-542. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJA-23-00030. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
4
Working-age first-time hearing aid users' self-reported outcomes.工作年龄段首次使用助听器用户的自我报告结果。
Int J Audiol. 2023 Sep;62(9):877-885. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2106454. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
5
Effectiveness of a Web-Based SUpport PRogram (SUPR) for Hearing Aid Users Aged 50+: Two-Arm, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的支持计划(SUPR)对 50 岁以上助听器使用者的有效性:双臂、群组随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 22;22(9):e17927. doi: 10.2196/17927.
6
Factors Influencing Hearing Disability and Reduction in Disability among First-time Hearing Aid Users in Singapore.新加坡首次使用助听器用户的听力障碍和残疾减轻的影响因素。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2020 Dec;49(12):978-989. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2020376.
7
Effects of remote ear-nose-and-throat specialist assessment screening on self-reported hearing aid benefit and satisfaction.远程耳鼻喉科专家评估筛查对自我报告的助听器益处和满意度的影响。
Int J Audiol. 2025 Jan;64(1):25-34. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2298506. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
8
Prediction of successful hearing aid treatment in first-time and experienced hearing aid users: Using the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids.首次和有经验的助听器使用者的助听器治疗成功预测:使用助听器国际结果量表。
Int J Audiol. 2022 Feb;61(2):119-129. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1916632. Epub 2021 May 25.
9
Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.成人助听器使用者使用丹麦语和非语义语音材料的可接受噪声级(ANL)。
Int J Audiol. 2012 Sep;51(9):678-88. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.692822. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
10
Prevalence of usage of hearing aids and its association with cognitive impairment in Japanese community-dwelling elders with hearing loss.日本社区听力损失老年人中助听器具使用的流行情况及其与认知障碍的相关性。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2022 Feb;49(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors correlated with hearing aids adherence in older adults: a prospective controlled study.老年人助听器佩戴相关因素的前瞻性对照研究。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Jun;52(6):3000605241232549. doi: 10.1177/03000605241232549.

本文引用的文献

1
Clustering Users Based on Hearing Aid Use: An Exploratory Analysis of Real-World Data.基于助听器使用情况对用户进行聚类:真实世界数据的探索性分析。
Front Digit Health. 2021 Sep 3;3:725130. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.725130. eCollection 2021.
2
Real-World Hearing Aid Usage Patterns and Smartphone Connectivity.真实世界中的助听器使用模式与智能手机连接性。
Front Digit Health. 2021 Aug 20;3:722186. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.722186. eCollection 2021.
3
Prediction of successful hearing aid treatment in first-time and experienced hearing aid users: Using the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids.
首次和有经验的助听器使用者的助听器治疗成功预测:使用助听器国际结果量表。
Int J Audiol. 2022 Feb;61(2):119-129. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1916632. Epub 2021 May 25.
4
Assessing Real-Life Benefit From Hearing-Aid Noise Management: SSQ12 Questionnaire Versus Ecological Momentary Assessment With Acoustic Data-Logging.评估助听器噪声管理的实际获益:SSQ12 问卷与声数据记录的生态瞬时评估。
Am J Audiol. 2021 Mar 10;30(1):93-104. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00042. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
5
Analysis of data from the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) using Bayesian Item Response Theory.使用贝叶斯项目反应理论分析国际助听器结果量表(IOI-HA)的数据。
Int J Audiol. 2021 Feb;60(2):81-88. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1813338. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
6
The Acoustic Environments in Which Older Adults Wear Their Hearing Aids: Insights From Datalogging Sound Environment Classification.老年人佩戴助听器的声学环境:来自数据记录声音环境分类的见解
Am J Audiol. 2018 Dec 6;27(4):594-603. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJA-18-0061.
7
Motivational engagement in first-time hearing aid users: A feasibility study.首次使用助听器用户的动机参与度:一项可行性研究。
Int J Audiol. 2016 Jul;55 Suppl 3:S23-33. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1133935. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
8
Hearing aid use in everyday life: managing contextual variability.日常生活中的助听器使用:应对情境变异性
Gerontology. 2015;61(2):158-65. doi: 10.1159/000366062. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
9
Patterns of hearing aid usage predict hearing aid use amount (data logged and self-reported) and overreport.助听器使用模式可预测助听器使用量(数据记录和自我报告)及报告过度情况。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Feb;25(2):187-98. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.25.2.7.
10
Psychometric properties of a revised Danish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).国际助听器成效量表(IOI-HA)丹麦语修订译本的心理测量特性。
Int J Audiol. 2014 May;53(5):302-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.874049. Epub 2014 Jan 29.