Suppr超能文献

基因在 C4 和 C3 类禾本科植物叶片中的糖感受器的空间表达模式。

Spatial expression patterns of genes encoding sugar sensors in leaves of C4 and C3 grasses.

机构信息

Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury Campus, New South Wales 2753, Australia.

Harper Adams University, Edgmond, TF10 8NB, UK.

出版信息

Ann Bot. 2023 Jul 10;131(6):985-1000. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad057.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The mechanisms of sugar sensing in grasses remain elusive, especially those using C4 photosynthesis even though a large proportion of the world's agricultural crops utilize this pathway. We addressed this gap by comparing the expression of genes encoding components of sugar sensors in C3 and C4 grasses, with a focus on source tissues of C4 grasses. Given C4 plants evolved into a two-cell carbon fixation system, it was hypothesized this may have also changed how sugars were sensed.

METHODS

For six C3 and eight C4 grasses, putative sugar sensor genes were identified for target of rapamycin (TOR), SNF1-related kinase 1 (SnRK1), hexokinase (HXK) and those involved in the metabolism of the sugar sensing metabolite trehalose-6-phosphate (T6P) using publicly available RNA deep sequencing data. For several of these grasses, expression was compared in three ways: source (leaf) versus sink (seed), along the gradient of the leaf, and bundle sheath versus mesophyll cells.

KEY RESULTS

No positive selection of codons associated with the evolution of C4 photosynthesis was identified in sugar sensor proteins here. Expressions of genes encoding sugar sensors were relatively ubiquitous between source and sink tissues as well as along the leaf gradient of both C4 and C3 grasses. Across C4 grasses, SnRK1β1 and TPS1 were preferentially expressed in the mesophyll and bundle sheath cells, respectively. Species-specific differences of gene expression between the two cell types were also apparent.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive transcriptomic study provides an initial foundation for elucidating sugar-sensing genes within major C4 and C3 crops. This study provides some evidence that C4 and C3 grasses do not differ in how sugars are sensed. While sugar sensor gene expression has a degree of stability along the leaf, there are some contrasts between the mesophyll and bundle sheath cells.

摘要

背景与目的

草类中的糖感应机制仍然难以捉摸,尤其是那些利用 C4 光合作用的机制,尽管世界上很大一部分农业作物都利用这种途径。我们通过比较 C3 和 C4 禾本科植物中糖传感器成分编码基因的表达,重点关注 C4 禾本科植物的源组织,来解决这一差距。鉴于 C4 植物演变成了一种两细胞碳固定系统,因此推测这也可能改变了糖的感应方式。

方法

利用公开的 RNA 深度测序数据,我们为六株 C3 和八株 C4 禾本科植物鉴定了雷帕霉素靶蛋白(TOR)、SNF1 相关激酶 1(SnRK1)、己糖激酶(HXK)和参与糖感应代谢物海藻糖-6-磷酸(T6P)的基因。对于其中的几种植物,我们以三种方式比较了它们的表达:源(叶)与汇(种子)、沿叶的梯度、束鞘与叶肉细胞。

主要结果

在这里,我们没有发现与 C4 光合作用进化相关的糖传感器蛋白的密码子的正选择。编码糖传感器的基因的表达在源组织和汇组织以及 C4 和 C3 禾本科植物的叶梯度中相对普遍。在 C4 禾本科植物中,SnRK1β1 和 TPS1 分别优先在叶肉细胞和束鞘细胞中表达。两种细胞类型之间的基因表达也存在物种特异性差异。

结论

这项全面的转录组研究为阐明主要 C4 和 C3 作物中的糖感应基因提供了初步基础。本研究提供了一些证据表明,C4 和 C3 禾本科植物在糖感应方面没有差异。虽然糖传感器基因的表达在叶片中有一定的稳定性,但在叶肉细胞和束鞘细胞之间存在一些差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77eb/10332396/965279d54bdd/mcad057_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验