• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HeiQ的构建与验证:一项面向操作的图形矩阵测试。

Construction and Validation of the HeiQ: An Operation-Oriented Figural Matrices Test.

作者信息

Pallentin Vanessa S, Danner Daniel, Rummel Jan

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Hauptstr. 47-51, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.

Section Psychology, University of Applied Labour Studies, Seckenheimer Landstr. 16, 68163 Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

J Intell. 2023 Apr 18;11(4):73. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040073.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence11040073
PMID:37103258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10144325/
Abstract

Figural matrices tests are among the most popular and well-investigated tests used to assess inductive reasoning abilities. Solving these tests requires the selection of a target that completes a figural matrix among distractors. Despite their generally good psychometric properties, previous matrices tests have limitations associated with distractor construction that prevent them from realizing their full potential. Most tests allow participants to identify the correct response by eliminating distractors based on superficial features. The goal of this study was to develop a novel figural matrices test which is less prone to the use of response elimination strategies, and to test its psychometric properties. The new test consists of 48 items and was validated with = 767 participants. Measurement models implied that the test is Rasch scalable, inferring a uniform underlying ability. The test showed good to very good reliability (retest-correlation: = 0.88; Cronbach's alpha: = 0.93; split-half reliability: = 0.88) and good construct validity ( = 0.81 with the Raven Progressive Matrices Test, = 0.73 with global intelligence scores of the Intelligence Structure Test 2000R, and = 0.58 with the global score of the Berlin Intelligence Structure Test). It even superseded the Raven Progressive Matrices Tests in criterion-related validity (correlation with final year high school grades ( = -0.49 < .001)). We conclude that this novel test has excellent psychometric properties and can be a valuable tool for researchers interested in reasoning assessment.

摘要

图形矩阵测试是用于评估归纳推理能力的最受欢迎且研究充分的测试之一。解决这些测试需要在干扰项中选择一个能完成图形矩阵的目标项。尽管它们通常具有良好的心理测量特性,但先前的矩阵测试存在与干扰项构建相关的局限性,这阻碍了它们充分发挥潜力。大多数测试允许参与者通过基于表面特征排除干扰项来识别正确答案。本研究的目的是开发一种不易使用排除答案策略的新型图形矩阵测试,并测试其心理测量特性。新测试由48个项目组成,并对767名参与者进行了验证。测量模型表明该测试具有拉施量表性,推断出一种统一的潜在能力。该测试显示出良好到非常好的信度(重测相关性:r = 0.88;克朗巴哈系数:α = 0.93;分半信度:r = 0.88)和良好的结构效度(与瑞文渐进矩阵测试的相关性:r = 0.81;与2000R智力结构测试的总体智力得分的相关性:r = 0.73;与柏林智力结构测试的总体得分的相关性:r = 0.58)。在效标关联效度方面,它甚至超过了瑞文渐进矩阵测试(与高中最后一年成绩的相关性:r = -0.49,p <.001)。我们得出结论,这种新型测试具有出色的心理测量特性,对于对推理评估感兴趣的研究人员而言可能是一种有价值的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a3/10144325/4d79632ecc1b/jintelligence-11-00073-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a3/10144325/1059ad8e153b/jintelligence-11-00073-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a3/10144325/5d4bd5fd2ad3/jintelligence-11-00073-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a3/10144325/4d79632ecc1b/jintelligence-11-00073-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a3/10144325/1059ad8e153b/jintelligence-11-00073-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a3/10144325/5d4bd5fd2ad3/jintelligence-11-00073-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a3/10144325/4d79632ecc1b/jintelligence-11-00073-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Construction and Validation of the HeiQ: An Operation-Oriented Figural Matrices Test.HeiQ的构建与验证:一项面向操作的图形矩阵测试。
J Intell. 2023 Apr 18;11(4):73. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040073.
2
Development and Validation of the Open Matrices Item Bank.开放式矩阵题库的开发与验证
J Intell. 2022 Jul 13;10(3):41. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10030041.
3
A Log File Analysis on the Validity of Partial Solutions in Figural Matrices Tests.关于图形矩阵测试中部分解决方案有效性的日志文件分析
J Intell. 2023 Feb 16;11(2):37. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11020037.
4
[The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].[法语使用者病前智力水平的评估]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82370-x.
5
Adaptation of the Intelligence Structure Test, Latvian version: psychometric properties.《智力结构测验拉脱维亚语版的改编:心理测量特性》
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 19;15:1319983. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1319983. eCollection 2024.
6
Towards the Validation of Executive Functioning Assessments: A Clinical Study.迈向执行功能评估的验证:一项临床研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 30;11(23):7138. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237138.
7
Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.颅面疼痛与功能障碍量表(CF-PDI):一种新问卷的编制及心理测量学验证
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):95-108.
8
Norm and Standardization Study for Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test, 5-9 Age Group.纳格利尔里非言语能力测验5至9岁年龄组常模与标准化研究
Alpha Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 1;23(5):237-242. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2022.21799. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
General fluid/inductive reasoning battery for a high-ability population.高能力人群的通用流体/归纳推理测验组合。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):507-522. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1098-4.
10
The biosafety incident response competence scale for clinical nursing staff: a development and validation study.临床护理人员生物安全事件应对能力量表的编制与验证研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 14;23(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01848-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Log File Times as Indicators of Structured Figural Matrix Processing.作为结构化图形矩阵处理指标的日志文件时间
J Intell. 2025 May 28;13(6):63. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13060063.
2
Using Cognitive Diagnostic Models to Evaluate the Two-Process Theory of Matrix Reasoning.运用认知诊断模型评估矩阵推理的双加工理论。
J Intell. 2025 Feb 15;13(2):22. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13020022.
3
Validation of the Short Parallel and Extra-Short Form of the Heidelberg Figural Matrices Test (HeiQ).海德堡图形矩阵测试(HeiQ)短平行和超短形式的验证。

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive strategies in matrix-reasoning tasks: State of the art.矩阵推理任务中的认知策略:最新进展
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):147-159. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02160-7. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
How Much Is in the Distractor? Re-Thinking Item-Analysis of Multiple-Choice Items.干扰项中有多少内容?重新思考多项选择题的项目分析。
J Intell. 2020 Mar 9;8(1):11. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8010011.
3
The Impact of Situational Test Anxiety on Retest Effects in Cognitive Ability Testing: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.情境性考试焦虑对认知能力测试中重测效应的影响:一种结构方程建模方法。
J Intell. 2024 Oct 14;12(10):100. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12100100.
J Intell. 2019 Sep 23;7(4):22. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence7040022.
4
Intraindividual strategy shifts in Raven's matrices, and their dependence on working memory capacity and need for cognition.个体在瑞文标准推理测验中的策略转变,及其对工作记忆容量和认知需求的依赖性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):564-579. doi: 10.1037/xge0000660. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
5
Same Test, Better Scores: Boosting the Reliability of Short Online Intelligence Recruitment Tests with Nested Logit Item Response Theory Models.相同测试,更高分数:运用嵌套逻辑斯蒂克项目反应理论模型提高在线简短智力招募测试的可靠性。
J Intell. 2019 Jul 10;7(3):17. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence7030017.
6
Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.谢谢克朗巴哈系数,接下来我们自己来。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000144. Epub 2017 May 29.
7
A novel method for analyzing sequential eye movements reveals strategic influence on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices.一种分析连续眼动的新方法揭示了对瑞文高级渐进矩阵测验的策略性影响。
J Vis. 2011 Sep 16;11(10):10. doi: 10.1167/11.10.10.
8
An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysis.评估多选题中的干扰项的功能和非功能:描述性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2009 Jul 7;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-40.
9
General mental ability in the world of work: occupational attainment and job performance.职场中的一般智力:职业成就与工作表现。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jan;86(1):162-73. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.162.
10
Individual differences in relative hemispheric alpha abundance and cognitive responses to persuasive communications.相对半球阿尔法丰度的个体差异以及对有说服力的沟通的认知反应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982 Sep;43(3):623-36. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.43.3.623.