DiBianco John Michael, Daignault-Newton Stephanie, Dupati Ajith, Hiller Spencer, Kachroo Naveen, Seifman Brian, Wenzler David, Dauw Casey A, Ghani Khurshid R
Department of Urology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Urol Pract. 2023 Mar;10(2):163-169. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000376. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
Despite AUA guidelines providing criteria for ureteral stent omission after ureteroscopy for nephrolithiasis, stenting rates in practice remain high. Because pre-stenting may be associated with improved patient outcomes, we assessed the impact of stent omission vs placement in pre-stented and non-pre-stented patients undergoing ureteroscopy on postoperative health care utilization in Michigan.
Using the MUSIC (Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative) registry (2016-2019), we identified pre-stented and non-pre-stented patients with low comorbidity undergoing single-stage ureteroscopy for ≤1.5 cm stones with no intraoperative complications. We assessed variation in stent omission for practices/urologists with ≥5 cases. Using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated whether stent placement in pre-stented patients was associated with emergency department visits and hospitalizations within 30 days of ureteroscopy.
We identified 6,266 ureteroscopies from 33 practices and 209 urologists, of which 2,244 (35.8%) were pre-stented. Pre-stented cases had higher rates of stent omission vs non-pre-stented cases (47.3% vs 26.3%). Among the 17 urology practices with ≥5 cases, stent omission rates in pre-stented patients varied widely (0%-77.8%). Among the 156 urologists with ≥5 cases, stent omission rates in pre-stented patients varied substantially (0%-100%); 34/152 (22.4%) never performed stent omission. Adjusting for risk factors, stent placement in pre-stented patients was associated with increased emergency department visits (OR 2.24, 95% CI:1.42-3.55) and hospitalizations (OR 2.19, 95% CI:1.12-4.26).
Pre-stented patients undergoing stent omission after ureteroscopy have lower unplanned health care utilization. Stent omission is underutilized in these patients, making them an ideal group for quality improvement efforts to avoid routine stent placement after ureteroscopy.
尽管美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)的指南提供了输尿管镜检查治疗肾结石后不放置输尿管支架的标准,但在实际操作中支架置入率仍然很高。由于预先放置支架可能与改善患者预后相关,我们评估了在密歇根州接受输尿管镜检查的预先放置支架和未预先放置支架的患者中,不放置支架与放置支架对术后医疗保健利用情况的影响。
利用密歇根泌尿外科手术改进协作组(MUSIC)登记处(2016 - 2019年)的数据,我们确定了合并症少、接受单阶段输尿管镜检查治疗直径≤1.5 cm结石且无术中并发症的预先放置支架和未预先放置支架的患者。我们评估了病例数≥5例的医疗机构/泌尿科医生在不放置支架方面的差异。使用多变量逻辑回归,我们评估了在预先放置支架的患者中放置支架是否与输尿管镜检查后30天内的急诊就诊和住院情况相关。
我们从33个医疗机构和209名泌尿科医生中识别出6266例输尿管镜检查病例,其中2244例(35.8%)为预先放置支架的病例。与未预先放置支架的病例相比,预先放置支架的病例中不放置支架的比例更高(47.3%对26.3%)。在病例数≥5例的17个泌尿外科医疗机构中,预先放置支架患者的不放置支架率差异很大(0% - 77.8%)。在病例数≥5例的156名泌尿科医生中,预先放置支架患者的不放置支架率差异也很大(0% - 100%);152名医生中有34名(22.4%)从未进行过不放置支架的操作。在对风险因素进行调整后,在预先放置支架的患者中放置支架与急诊就诊次数增加(比值比2.24,95%置信区间:1.42 - 3.55)和住院次数增加(比值比2.19,95%置信区间:1.12 - 4.26)相关。
输尿管镜检查后不放置支架的预先放置支架患者的非计划医疗保健利用率较低。在这些患者中不放置支架的做法未得到充分利用,这使他们成为改善质量以避免输尿管镜检查后常规放置支架的理想人群。