Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Glickman Urology and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Endourol. 2023 Nov;37(11):1174-1178. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0300. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
The American Urological Association guidelines state that continuing anticoagulant (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) agents during ureteroscopy (URS) is safe. Through a multi-institutional retrospective study, we sought to determine whether pre-stenting in patients on AP or AC was associated with fewer URS bleeding-related complications. A series of 8614 URS procedures performed across three institutions (April 2010 to September 2017) was electronically reviewed for AC/AP use at time of URS. Records indicating AC or AP use at time of URS were then manually reviewed to characterize intraoperative and 30-day postoperative (intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hematuria, emergency department visits, hospital readmission, unplanned reoperation, phone calls, and other minor 30-day complications). A total of 293 identified URS procedures were completed on patients on AC/AP therapy-112 cases were on AC only (38 were pre-stented), 158 on AP only (51 pre-stented), and 23 on both AP and AC (8 pre-stented). Patient characteristics and comorbidities were similar between the pre-stented and non-pre-stented groups. For AC and AP subjects, pre-stenting did not decrease the composite risk of bleeding complications (10.3% pre-stent 12.2% non-prestent, = 0.6). Pre-stented patients did have a significantly lower likelihood of requiring an unplanned reoperation (1.0% 5.6%, = 0.04). In the subgroup of patients on AP alone, pre-stented patients had significantly fewer episodes of intraoperative bleeding (0% 9%, = 0.04), unplanned reoperations (0% 6.5%, = 0.02), and 30-day complications (14% 27%, = 0.05). In the subgroup of patients on AC alone, there were no significant differences in outcomes based on stent status. In this multi-institutional study, we found that pre-stenting before URS was not associated with fewer bleeding complications. However, pre-stenting appeared to be associated with improved outcomes for those patients on AP therapy. These results suggest a need for prospective studies to clarify the role of pre-stenting for URS.
美国泌尿外科学会指南指出,在输尿管镜检查 (URS) 期间继续使用抗凝剂 (AC) 和抗血小板药物 (AP) 是安全的。通过一项多机构回顾性研究,我们旨在确定在接受 AP 或 AC 治疗的患者中,术前放置支架是否与较少的 URS 出血相关并发症有关。对三家医院(2010 年 4 月至 2017 年 9 月)进行的 8614 例 URS 手术的电子记录进行了审查,以确定在 URS 时使用 AC/AP 的情况。然后,对记录中表明在 URS 时使用 AC 或 AP 的情况进行了手动审查,以描述术中和 30 天术后(术中出血、术后血尿、急诊科就诊、住院再入院、计划外再次手术、电话咨询和其他 30 天内的轻微并发症)的情况。在接受 AC/AP 治疗的 293 例 URS 手术中,有 112 例仅接受 AC(其中 38 例术前放置了支架),158 例仅接受 AP(其中 51 例术前放置了支架),23 例同时接受 AP 和 AC(8 例术前放置了支架)。支架组和非支架组患者的特征和合并症相似。对于 AC 和 AP 患者,术前放置支架并未降低出血并发症的综合风险(支架前 10.3%,非支架前 12.2%,=0.6)。支架前的患者确实更不可能需要计划外再次手术(1.0%,非支架前 5.6%,=0.04)。在单独接受 AP 的患者亚组中,支架前患者术中出血(0%,9%,=0.04)、计划外再次手术(0%,6.5%,=0.02)和 30 天并发症(14%,27%,=0.05)的发生明显较少。在单独接受 AC 的患者亚组中,支架状态对结果无显著影响。在这项多机构研究中,我们发现 URS 前放置支架并不能减少出血并发症。然而,对于接受 AP 治疗的患者,支架前放置似乎与改善结局有关。这些结果表明需要进行前瞻性研究来阐明 URS 前支架的作用。