文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

奥密克戎时代替昔加韦单抗/西加韦单抗(Evusheld)的真实世界疗效。

Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.

Department of Pharmacy, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 27;18(4):e0275356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275356. eCollection 2023.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0275356
PMID:37104498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138227/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T/C) received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) based on results of a clinical trial conducted prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant. The clinical effectiveness of T/C has not been well described in the Omicron era. We examined the incidence of symptomatic illness and hospitalizations among T/C recipients when Omicron accounted for virtually all local cases. METHODS: Through retrospective electronic medical record chart review, we identified patients who received T/C between January 1 -July 31, 2022 within our quaternary referral health system. We determined the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations due to or presumed to be caused by early Omicron variants before and after receiving T/C (pre-T/C and post-T/C). Chi square and Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon two-sample tests were used to examine differences between the characteristics of those who got COVID-19 before or after T/C prophylaxis, and rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess differences in hospitalization rates for the two groups. RESULTS: Of 1295 T/C recipients, 105 (8.1%) developed symptomatic COVID-19 infection before receiving T/C, and 102 (7.9%) developed symptomatic disease after receiving it. Of the 105 patients who developed symptomatic infection pre-T/C, 26 (24.8%) were hospitalized, compared with six of the 102 patients (5.9%) who were diagnosed with COVID-19 post-T/C (RR = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.10-0.55; p = 0.0002). Seven of the 105 (6.7%) patients infected pre-T/C, but none of the 102 infected post-T/C required ICU care. No COVID-related deaths occurred in either group. The majority of COVID-19 cases among those infected pre-T/C treatment occurred during the Omicron BA.1 surge, while the majority of post-T/C cases occurred when Omicron BA.5 was predominant. In both groups, having at least one dose of vaccine strongly protected against hospitalization (pre-T/C group RR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.17-0.57, p = 0.02; post-T/C group RR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.03-0.94; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: We identified COVID-19 infections after T/C prophylaxis. Among patients who received T/C at our institution, COVID-19 Omicron cases occurring after T/C were one-fourth as likely to require hospitalization compared to those with Omicron prior to T/C. However, due to the presence of changing vaccine coverage, multiple therapies, and changing variants, the effectiveness of T/C in the Omicron era remains difficult to assess.

摘要

背景:特敏福(tixagevimab/cilgavimab,T/C)用于 COVID-19 的暴露前预防,在 Omicron 变体出现之前的临床试验结果基础上获得了紧急使用授权(EUA)。在 Omicron 时代,T/C 的临床效果尚未得到很好的描述。我们研究了当 Omicron 变体几乎完全成为当地所有病例时,T/C 接受者出现有症状疾病和住院的情况。

方法:通过回顾性电子病历图表审查,我们确定了在我们的四级转诊健康系统中,2022 年 1 月 1 日至 7 月 31 日期间接受 T/C 的患者。我们确定了在接受 T/C 之前和之后(T/C 前和 T/C 后)因早期 Omicron 变体或疑似由其引起的有症状 COVID-19 感染和住院的发生率。卡方和曼-惠特尼 Wilcoxon 两样本检验用于检查在 T/C 预防之前或之后感染 COVID-19 的患者特征之间的差异,并且计算率比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)以评估两组住院率的差异。

结果:在 1295 名 T/C 接受者中,有 105 名(8.1%)在接受 T/C 之前出现有症状的 COVID-19 感染,有 102 名(7.9%)在接受 T/C 之后出现有症状的疾病。在 105 名 T/C 前出现有症状感染的患者中,有 26 名(24.8%)住院,而在 102 名 T/C 后诊断为 COVID-19 的患者中,有 6 名(5.9%)住院(RR = 0.24;95%CI = 0.10-0.55;p = 0.0002)。在 T/C 前感染的 105 名患者中,有 7 名(6.7%)需要 ICU 护理,而在 T/C 后感染的患者中没有。两组均未发生与 COVID 相关的死亡。在 T/C 前感染的患者中,大多数 COVID-19 病例发生在 Omicron BA.1 激增期间,而 T/C 后感染的大多数病例发生在 Omicron BA.5 为主时。在两组中,至少接种一剂疫苗可强烈预防住院(T/C 前组 RR = 0.31,95%CI = 0.17-0.57,p = 0.02;T/C 后组 RR = 0.15;95%CI = 0.03-0.94;p = 0.04)。

结论:我们发现了 T/C 预防后的 COVID-19 感染。在我们机构接受 T/C 的患者中,与 T/C 前发生的 Omicron 病例相比,T/C 后发生的 Omicron 病例需要住院治疗的可能性降低了四分之一。然而,由于疫苗接种覆盖率、多种疗法和不断变化的变体的存在,T/C 在 Omicron 时代的有效性仍然难以评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4705/10138227/dfff9f3f0ad4/pone.0275356.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4705/10138227/dfff9f3f0ad4/pone.0275356.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4705/10138227/dfff9f3f0ad4/pone.0275356.g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era.

PLoS One. 2023

[2]
Tixagevimab/cilgavimab for preventing COVID-19 during the Omicron surge: retrospective analysis of National Veterans Health Administration electronic data.

mBio. 2023-8-31

[3]
Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the Omicron BA.5 wave at a single institution in Japan.

Int J Hematol. 2023-12

[4]
Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab as Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis against COVID-19 for Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Prospective Study in the Omicron Era.

Diseases. 2023-9-18

[5]
COVID-19 Outcomes in Lung Transplant Recipients Following Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis With Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab During the Omicron BA.5 Surge: A Single Center Analysis.

Transpl Int. 2024

[6]
Effect of tixagevimab/cilgavimab for pre-exposure prophylaxis during the China Omicron outbreak.

Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2023

[7]
Real-World Efficacy of COVID-19 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis with Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab in People with Multiple Sclerosis.

Vaccines (Basel). 2023-12-15

[8]
Tixagevimab/cilgavimab pre-exposure prophylaxis is associated with lower breakthrough infection risk in vaccinated solid organ transplant recipients during the omicron wave.

Am J Transplant. 2022-12

[9]
Genotypic and predicted phenotypic analysis of SARS-COV-2 Omicron subvariants in immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 following tixagevimab-cilgavimab prophylaxis.

J Clin Virol. 2023-3

[10]
Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with hematologic diseases receiving tixagevimab/cilgavimab as pre-exposure prophylaxis in most recent Omicron sublineages era.

Int J Infect Dis. 2024-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Development of the TSR-based computational method to investigate spike and monoclonal antibody interactions.

Front Chem. 2025-3-19

[2]
Effectiveness of AZD7442 (Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab) for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Against COVID-19 Hospitalization in Israel During the Omicron Sub-Variant Time Period.

Infect Dis Ther. 2025-2

[3]
Real World Use of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis of COVID-19 in Immunocompromised Individuals: Data from the OCTOPUS Study.

Vaccines (Basel). 2024-7-17

[4]
Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab as Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis against COVID-19 for Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Prospective Study in the Omicron Era.

Diseases. 2023-9-18

[5]
Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the Omicron BA.5 wave at a single institution in Japan.

Int J Hematol. 2023-12

[6]
SARS-CoV-2 infection in high-risk children following tixagevimab-cilgavimab (Evusheld) pre-exposure prophylaxis: a single-center observational study.

Front Oncol. 2023-8-3

[7]
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and COVID-19.

Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2023-10

[8]
A Review of the Currently Available Antibody Therapy for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Antibodies (Basel). 2023-1-11

[9]
Comparison of humoral immunogenicity in solid organ transplant recipients after third-dose mRNA vaccine with homologous or heterologous schedules: An observational study.

J Clin Virol. 2023-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld) for COVID-19 among 1112 severely immunocompromised patients.

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022-12

[2]
Association Between AZD7442 (Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab) Administration and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection, Hospitalization, and Mortality.

Clin Infect Dis. 2023-2-8

[3]
Efficacy of Licensed Monoclonal Antibodies and Antiviral Agents against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Sublineages BA.1 and BA.2.

Viruses. 2022-6-23

[4]
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Immunocompromised Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Caused by the Omicron Variant: A Prospective, Observational Study.

Clin Infect Dis. 2023-2-8

[5]
Tixagevimab/cilgavimab pre-exposure prophylaxis is associated with lower breakthrough infection risk in vaccinated solid organ transplant recipients during the omicron wave.

Am J Transplant. 2022-12

[6]
Breakthrough COVID-19 cases despite prophylaxis with 150 mg of tixagevimab and 150 mg of cilgavimab in kidney transplant recipients.

Am J Transplant. 2022-11

[7]
Intramuscular AZD7442 (Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab) for Prevention of Covid-19.

N Engl J Med. 2022-6-9

[8]
Clinical severity of, and effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against, covid-19 from omicron, delta, and alpha SARS-CoV-2 variants in the United States: prospective observational study.

BMJ. 2022-3-9

[9]
SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-B.1.1.529 leads to widespread escape from neutralizing antibody responses.

Cell. 2022-2-3

[10]
An infectious SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron virus escapes neutralization by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Nat Med. 2022-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索