Lasson Clotilde, Rousseau Amélie, Vicente Siobhan, Goutaudier Nelly, Romo Lucia, Roncero María, Barrada Juan Ramón
Laboratoire CERPPS (Centre d'Etudes Et de Recherches en Psychopathologie Et Psychologie de La Santé), Université Toulouse-Jean Jaurès, UT2J, 5 allées Antonio Machado, 31058, Toulouse, France.
Centre de Recherches Sur La Cognition Et L'Apprentissage-CeRCA-(CNRS, UMR 7295) MSHS, Université de Poitiers, 5 Rue Théodore Lefebvre, 86073, Poitiers Cedex 9, France.
J Eat Disord. 2023 Apr 28;11(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40337-023-00764-5.
As no French validated measurement tool distinguishing healthy orthorexia (HeOr) from orthorexia nervosa (OrNe) currently exists, this study aimed at examining psychometric properties of the French version of the Teruel Orthorexia Scale (TOS). A sample of 799 participants (Mean [SD] age: 28.5 [12.1] years-old) completed the French versions of the TOS, the Düsseldorfer Orthorexia Skala, the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire, and the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised. Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) were used. Although the bidimensional model, with OrNe and HeOr, of the original 17-item version showed an adequate fit, we suggest excluding items 9 and 15. The bidimensional model for the shortened version provided a satisfactory fit (ESEM model: CFI = .963, TLI = .949, RMSEA = .068). The mean loading was .65 for HeOr and .70 for OrNe. The internal consistency of both dimensions was adequate (α = .83 and α = .81). Partial correlations showed that eating disorders and obsessive-compulsive symptomatology measures were positively related to OrNe and unrelated or negatively related to HeOr. The scores from the 15-item French version of the TOS in the current sample appears to present an adequate internal consistency, pattern of associations in line with what was theoretically expected, and promising for differentiating both types of orthorexia in a French population. We discuss why both dimensions of orthorexia should be considered in this area of research.
由于目前尚无经过法国验证的区分健康正食癖(HeOr)和神经性正食癖(OrNe)的测量工具,本研究旨在检验特鲁埃尔正食癖量表(TOS)法语版的心理测量特性。799名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄:28.5[12.1]岁)完成了TOS法语版、杜塞尔多夫正食癖量表、饮食失调检查问卷和修订版强迫观念及行为量表。采用验证性因素分析和探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)。尽管最初17项版本的双维度模型(包括OrNe和HeOr)显示拟合良好,但我们建议排除第9项和第15项。缩短版的双维度模型提供了令人满意的拟合度(ESEM模型:CFI = 0.963,TLI = 0.949,RMSEA = 0.068)。HeOr的平均载荷为0.65,OrNe的平均载荷为0.70。两个维度的内部一致性都足够(α = 0.83和α = 0.81)。偏相关分析表明,饮食失调和强迫症状测量与OrNe呈正相关,与HeOr无关或呈负相关。当前样本中15项TOS法语版的得分似乎具有足够的内部一致性、符合理论预期的关联模式,并且有望在法国人群中区分这两种类型的正食癖。我们讨论了在该研究领域中为何应考虑正食癖的两个维度。