• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在植入左心室辅助装置之前,通过锁骨下动脉途径使用Impella 5.0支持对重度心力衰竭患者进行心脏康复治疗。

Cardiac Rehabilitation in Severe Heart Failure Patients with Impella 5.0 Support via the Subclavian Artery Approach Prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

作者信息

Shimizu Miho, Hiraiwa Hiroaki, Tanaka Shinya, Tsuchikawa Yohei, Ito Ryota, Kazama Shingo, Kimura Yuki, Araki Takashi, Mizutani Takashi, Oishi Hideo, Kuwayama Tasuku, Kondo Toru, Morimoto Ryota, Okumura Takahiro, Ito Hideki, Yoshizumi Tomo, Mutsuga Masato, Usui Akihiko, Murohara Toyoaki

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya 466-8560, Japan.

Department of Rehabilitation, Mie University Hospital, Tsu 514-8507, Japan.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 Apr 3;13(4):630. doi: 10.3390/jpm13040630.

DOI:10.3390/jpm13040630
PMID:37109016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10143331/
Abstract

Impella 5.0 circulatory support via subclavian artery (SA) access may be a safe approach for patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR). In this case series, we retrospectively analyzed the demographic characteristics, physical function, and CR data of six patients who underwent Impella 5.0 implantation via the SA prior to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation between October 2013 and June 2021. The median age was 48 years, and one patient was female. Grip strength was maintained or increased in all patients before LVAD implantation (pre-LVAD) compared to after Impella 5.0 implantation. The pre-LVAD knee extension isometric strength (KEIS) was less than 0.46 kgf/kg in two patients and more than 0.46 kgf/kg in three patients (unavailable KEIS data, = 1). With Impella 5.0 implantation, two patients could ambulate, one could stand, two could sit on the edge of the bed, and one remained in bed. One patient lost consciousness during CR due to decreased Impella flow. There were no other serious adverse events. Impella 5.0 implantation via the SA allows mobilization, including ambulation, prior to LVAD implantation, and CR can be performed relatively safely.

摘要

经锁骨下动脉(SA)通路使用Impella 5.0进行循环支持对于接受心脏康复(CR)的患者可能是一种安全的方法。在本病例系列中,我们回顾性分析了2013年10月至2021年6月期间在植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)之前通过SA植入Impella 5.0的6例患者的人口统计学特征、身体功能和CR数据。中位年龄为48岁,1例为女性。与Impella 5.0植入后相比,所有患者在LVAD植入前(LVAD前)的握力保持或增加。LVAD前,2例患者的膝关节伸展等长力量(KEIS)小于0.46 kgf/kg,3例患者大于0.46 kgf/kg(KEIS数据不可用,1例)。随着Impella 5.0的植入,2例患者可以行走,1例可以站立,2例可以坐在床边,1例仍卧床。1例患者在CR期间因Impella血流减少而失去意识。没有其他严重不良事件。通过SA植入Impella 5.0可在LVAD植入前实现包括行走在内的活动能力,并且可以相对安全地进行CR。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/871b/10143331/202b948d5291/jpm-13-00630-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/871b/10143331/202b948d5291/jpm-13-00630-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/871b/10143331/202b948d5291/jpm-13-00630-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cardiac Rehabilitation in Severe Heart Failure Patients with Impella 5.0 Support via the Subclavian Artery Approach Prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.在植入左心室辅助装置之前,通过锁骨下动脉途径使用Impella 5.0支持对重度心力衰竭患者进行心脏康复治疗。
J Pers Med. 2023 Apr 3;13(4):630. doi: 10.3390/jpm13040630.
2
Impella 5.0 Support in INTERMACS II Cardiogenic Shock Patients Using Right and Left Axillary Artery Access.在使用左右腋动脉入路的INTERMACS II级心源性休克患者中使用Impella 5.0支持
Artif Organs. 2015 Aug;39(8):660-3. doi: 10.1111/aor.12529. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
3
Using the Minimally Invasive Impella 5.0 via the Right Subclavian Artery Cutdown for Acute on Chronic Decompensated Heart Failure as a Bridge to Decision.经右锁骨下动脉切开置入微创Impella 5.0治疗慢性失代偿性心力衰竭急性发作作为决策桥梁
Ochsner J. 2016 Fall;16(3):210-6.
4
Bridging INTERMACS 1 patients from VA-ECMO to LVAD via Impella 5.0: De-escalate and ambulate.经 Impella 5.0 将 INTERMACS 1 患者从 VA-ECMO 桥接到 LVAD:降级并活动。
J Crit Care. 2020 Jun;57:259-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.028. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
5
Treatment With Impella Increases the Risk of De Novo Aortic Insufficiency Post Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant.主动脉瓣反流是左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后常见的并发症,会导致左心室容量负荷增加、心功能恶化和预后不良。
J Card Fail. 2020 Oct;26(10):870-875. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
6
Surgical Explantation of Impella 5.5 With Inflow Thrombus in Patients Undergoing Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.在接受持久左心室辅助装置植入的患者中对带流入道血栓的Impella 5.5进行外科取出术。
Innovations (Phila). 2023 Sep-Oct;18(5):489-493. doi: 10.1177/15569845231196862. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
7
Impella 5.0 as a Second-Line Mechanical Circulatory Support Strategy After Extracorporeal Life Support.体外生命支持后,Impella 5.0作为二线机械循环支持策略
Artif Organs. 2016 Sep;40(9):909-16. doi: 10.1111/aor.12804.
8
Comparison of Impella 5.0 and extracorporeal left ventricular assist device in patients with cardiogenic shock.比较 Impella 5.0 和体外左心室辅助装置在心源性休克患者中的应用。
Int J Artif Organs. 2021 Nov;44(11):846-853. doi: 10.1177/03913988211040530. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
Impella RP as a bridge to cardiac transplant for refractory late right ventricular failure in setting of left ventricular assist device.Impella RP 作为左心室辅助装置治疗难治性晚期右心室衰竭的桥接治疗用于心脏移植。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;7(4):1972-1975. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12685. Epub 2020 May 19.
10
Use of Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Before Durable Device Implantation in Patients With Cardiac Cachexia: Case Series.经皮左心室辅助装置在心脏恶病质患者植入耐用性装置前的应用:病例系列。
ASAIO J. 2023 Jul 1;69(7):e354-e359. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001902. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of acute phase intensive electrical muscle stimulation in COVID-19 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: an observational case-control study.急性强化电肌肉刺激对需要有创机械通气的 COVID-19 患者的影响:一项观察性病例对照研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 4;14(1):5254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55969-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-Term Outcomes of Impella Support in Japanese Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Due to Acute Myocardial Infarction - Japanese Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device (J-PVAD).日本急性心肌梗死所致心源性休克患者使用Impella支持的短期结局——日本经皮心室辅助装置注册研究(J-PVAD)
Circ J. 2023 Apr 25;87(5):588-597. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0476. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
2
Short- and long-term effects of a cardiac rehabilitation program in patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device.左心室辅助装置植入患者心脏康复计划的短期和长期效果。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0259927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259927. eCollection 2021.
3
Effect of preoperative erector spinae muscles mass on postoperative outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist devices.
左心室辅助装置患者术前竖脊肌质量对术后结果的影响。
J Card Surg. 2022 Feb;37(2):297-304. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16100. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
4
Comparison of Impella 5.0 and extracorporeal left ventricular assist device in patients with cardiogenic shock.比较 Impella 5.0 和体外左心室辅助装置在心源性休克患者中的应用。
Int J Artif Organs. 2021 Nov;44(11):846-853. doi: 10.1177/03913988211040530. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
5
Hemodynamic Changes During Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Mobility Therapy for an Advanced Heart Failure Patient with Impella 5.0 Device.在使用 Impella 5.0 设备的晚期心力衰竭患者中,进行神经肌肉电刺激和活动治疗期间的血液动力学变化。
Int Heart J. 2021 May 29;62(3):695-699. doi: 10.1536/ihj.20-632. Epub 2021 May 15.
6
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2020 Annual Report.《胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 2020 年度报告》。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Mar;111(3):778-792. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.038. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
7
JCS 2017/JHFS 2017 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure - Digest Version.《日本循环学会2017年/日本心力衰竭学会2017年急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南 - 摘要版》
Circ J. 2019 Sep 25;83(10):2084-2184. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0342. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
8
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is feasible in patients with acute heart failure.神经肌肉电刺激在急性心力衰竭患者中是可行的。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Oct;6(5):975-982. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12504. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
9
The Impella Device: Historical Background, Clinical Applications and Future Directions.Impella装置:历史背景、临床应用及未来方向。
Int J Angiol. 2019 Jun;28(2):118-123. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676369. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
10
Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克中,Impella 与 IABP 比较。
Open Heart. 2019 May 13;6(1):e000987. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000987. eCollection 2019.