Suppr超能文献

用于诊断儿童哮喘的呼吸印记

Breath Prints for Diagnosing Asthma in Children.

作者信息

Sas Valentina, Cherecheș-Panța Paraschiva, Borcau Diana, Schnell Cristina-Nicoleta, Ichim Edita-Gabriela, Iacob Daniela, Coblișan Alina-Petronela, Drugan Tudor, Man Sorin-Claudiu

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 400124 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Clinical Hospital for Pediatric Emergencies, 400124 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 12;12(8):2831. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082831.

Abstract

Electronic nose (e-nose) is a new technology applied for the identification of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in breath air. Measuring VOC in exhaled breath can adequately identify airway inflammation, especially in asthma. Its noninvasive character makes e-nose an attractive technology applicable in pediatrics. We hypothesized that an electronic nose could discriminate the breath prints of patients with asthma from controls. A cross-sectional study was conducted and included 35 pediatric patients. Eleven cases and seven controls formed the two training models (models A and B). Another nine cases and eight controls formed the external validation group. Exhaled breath samples were analyzed using Cyranose 320, Smith Detections, Pasadena, CA, USA. The discriminative ability of breath prints was investigated by principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical discriminative analysis (CDA). Cross-validation accuracy (CVA) was calculated. For the external validation step, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Duplicate sampling of exhaled breath was obtained for ten patients. E-nose was able to discriminate between the controls and asthmatic patient group with a CVA of 63.63% and an M-distance of 3.13 for model A and a CVA of 90% and an M-distance of 5.55 for model B in the internal validation step. In the second step of external validation, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 64%, 77% and 50%, respectively, for model A, and 58%, 66% and 50%, respectively, for model B. Between paired breath sample fingerprints, there were no significant differences. An electronic nose can discriminate pediatric patients with asthma from controls, but the accuracy obtained in the external validation was lower than the CVA obtained in the internal validation step.

摘要

电子鼻是一种用于识别呼出气体中挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的新技术。测量呼出气体中的VOC能够充分识别气道炎症,尤其是在哮喘患者中。其非侵入性特点使电子鼻成为适用于儿科的一项有吸引力的技术。我们假设电子鼻能够区分哮喘患者与对照组的呼吸特征。开展了一项横断面研究,纳入35例儿科患者。11例患者和7例对照组成两个训练模型(模型A和模型B)。另外9例患者和8例对照组成外部验证组。使用美国加利福尼亚州帕萨迪纳市史密斯检测公司的Cyranose 320分析呼出气体样本。通过主成分分析(PCA)和典型判别分析(CDA)研究呼吸特征的判别能力。计算交叉验证准确率(CVA)。对于外部验证步骤,计算准确率、敏感性和特异性。对10例患者的呼出气体进行重复采样。在内部验证步骤中,对于模型A,电子鼻能够区分对照组和哮喘患者组,CVA为63.63%,M距离为3.13;对于模型B,CVA为90%,M距离为5.55。在外部验证的第二步中,模型A 的准确率、敏感性和特异性分别为64%、77%和50%,模型B分别为58%、66%和50%。在配对的呼吸样本指纹之间,没有显著差异。电子鼻能够区分儿科哮喘患者与对照组,但外部验证中获得的准确率低于内部验证步骤中获得的CVA。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c46/10146639/c91fdf63c119/jcm-12-02831-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验