Steele C, Lucas M J, Tune L
J Clin Psychiatry. 1986 Jun;47(6):310-2.
To compare the efficacy and side effects of haloperidol and thioridazine in the management of behavioral symptoms of senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type, 16 patients were studied in an open crossover design study. Following 2-week drug washout, patients were alternately assigned to either haloperidol (1, 2, and 5 mg/day for 2 weeks) or thioridazine (25, 50, and 75 mg/day for 2 weeks). After completing the first neuroleptic, patients were washed out and then tried on the second neuroleptic. Six patients completed the crossover design, 1 received only haloperidol, and 9 received only thioridazine. Both drugs were effective in managing target behaviors, which included hostility, uncooperativeness, bothersomeness, emotional lability, and irritability. Complaints of fatigue and extrapyramidal side effects were greater with haloperidol than with thioridazine. Neither compound produced significant impairments in cognition as assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination score or caused orthostatic hypertension.
为比较氟哌啶醇和硫利达嗪在治疗阿尔茨海默型老年痴呆行为症状方面的疗效和副作用,对16例患者进行了一项开放交叉设计研究。经过2周的药物洗脱期后,患者被交替分配接受氟哌啶醇(1、2和5毫克/天,持续2周)或硫利达嗪(25、50和75毫克/天,持续2周)治疗。完成第一种抗精神病药物治疗后,患者进行洗脱,然后试用第二种抗精神病药物。6例患者完成了交叉设计,1例仅接受氟哌啶醇治疗,9例仅接受硫利达嗪治疗。两种药物在管理目标行为方面均有效,这些目标行为包括敌意、不合作、烦扰、情绪不稳定和易怒。与硫利达嗪相比,氟哌啶醇引起的疲劳和锥体外系副作用的投诉更多。根据简易精神状态检查评分评估,两种化合物均未对认知产生显著损害,也未引起体位性高血压。