• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国水果和蔬菜供应链中存在强迫劳动风险。

Risk of forced labour embedded in the US fruit and vegetable supply.

作者信息

Blackstone Nicole Tichenor, Norris Catherine Benoit, Robbins Tali, Jackson Bethany, Decker Sparks Jessica L

机构信息

Division of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.

NewEarth B, York, ME, USA.

出版信息

Nat Food. 2021 Sep;2(9):692-699. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00339-0. Epub 2021 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1038/s43016-021-00339-0
PMID:37117463
Abstract

Sustainable food consumption studies have largely focused on promoting human health within ecological limits. Less attention has been paid to social sustainability, in part because of limited data and models. Globally, agriculture has one of the highest incidences of forced labour, with exploitative conditions enabled by low margins, domestic labour scarcity, inadequate legal protections for workers and high labour requirements. Here we assess the forced labour risk embedded in the US retail supply of fruits and vegetables using distinct datasets and a new forced labour risk scoring method. We demonstrate that there is risk of forced labour in a broad set of fruit and vegetable commodities, with a small number of commodities accounting for a substantial fraction of total risk at the retail supply level. These findings signal potential trade-offs and synergies across dimensions of food system sustainability and the need for novel research approaches to develop evidence-based forced labour risk mitigation strategies.

摘要

可持续食品消费研究主要集中在生态限度内促进人类健康。对社会可持续性的关注较少,部分原因是数据和模型有限。在全球范围内,农业是强迫劳动发生率最高的行业之一,低利润率、家庭劳动力短缺、对工人的法律保护不足以及高劳动力需求导致了剥削性劳动条件。在此,我们使用不同的数据集和一种新的强迫劳动风险评分方法,评估美国水果和蔬菜零售供应链中潜在的强迫劳动风险。我们证明,多种水果和蔬菜商品存在强迫劳动风险,少数商品在零售供应链层面的总风险中占很大比例。这些发现表明,在食品系统可持续性的各个维度之间可能存在权衡和协同效应,并且需要新的研究方法来制定基于证据的强迫劳动风险缓解策略。

相似文献

1
Risk of forced labour embedded in the US fruit and vegetable supply.美国水果和蔬菜供应链中存在强迫劳动风险。
Nat Food. 2021 Sep;2(9):692-699. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00339-0. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
2
Forced labour risk is pervasive in the US land-based food supply.美国陆地食品供应中普遍存在强迫劳动风险。
Nat Food. 2023 Jul;4(7):596-606. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00794-x. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
3
Sustainability assessment with structural equation modeling in fresh food supply chain management.采用结构方程模型的新鲜食品供应链管理中的可持续性评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(29):39558-39575. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13478-5. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
4
Fruits and Vegetables in International Agricultural Research: A Case of Neglect?水果和蔬菜在国际农业研究中的地位:被忽视了吗?
World Rev Nutr Diet. 2020;121:42-59. doi: 10.1159/000507518. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Legal Feasibility and Implementation of Federal Strategies for a National Retail-Based Fruit and Vegetable Subsidy Program in the United States.美国基于零售的全国性水果和蔬菜补贴计划的联邦策略的法律可行性和实施。
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):775-801. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12461. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
6
The COVID-19 pandemic and trade in agricultural products.新冠疫情与农产品贸易
World Econ. 2023 Jan 4. doi: 10.1111/twec.13376.
7
Meat, fruit, and vegetable consumption in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区的肉类、水果和蔬菜消费:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Nutr Rev. 2021 May 12;79(6):651-692. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa032.
8
Perceived environmental supports for fruit and vegetable consumption among older adults in the US.美国老年人对水果和蔬菜消费的感知环境支持。
Nutr Health. 2021 Sep;27(3):309-319. doi: 10.1177/0260106021993749. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
9
Fruit and vegetable intake and their pesticide residues in relation to semen quality among men from a fertility clinic.一家生育诊所男性的水果和蔬菜摄入量及其农药残留与精液质量的关系
Hum Reprod. 2015 Jun;30(6):1342-51. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev064. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
10
Aid for Trade: an opportunity to increase fruit and vegetable supply.贸易援助计划:增加果蔬供应的契机
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Jan 1;91(1):57-63. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.106955. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a More Holistic Comparative Assessment of Plant-Based Alternative Beverages and Dairy Milk: A True Cost Accounting Approach.迈向对植物基替代饮料和牛奶更全面的比较评估:一种真实成本核算方法。
Foods. 2025 Jun 23;14(13):2196. doi: 10.3390/foods14132196.
2
Diets cannot be sustainable without ensuring the well-being of communities, workers and animals in food value chains.如果不能确保食物链中社区、工人和动物的福祉,饮食就不可能可持续。
Nat Food. 2024 Oct;5(10):818-824. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-01048-0. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
3
Digital innovations for monitoring sustainability in food systems.
数字创新监测食品系统可持续性。
Nat Food. 2024 Aug;5(8):656-660. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-01018-6. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
4
Augmenting the National Nutrition Data System to Promote Diet Sustainability Analyses.增强国家营养数据系统以促进饮食可持续性分析。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Jun 6;8(7):103793. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.103793. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Inequality in economic shock exposures across the global firm-level supply network.全球企业层面供应链网络中经济冲击暴露的不平等。
Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 18;15(1):3348. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46126-w.
6
Greater adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans is associated with lower diet-related greenhouse gas emissions but higher costs.更严格遵循《美国膳食指南》与较低的饮食相关温室气体排放相关,但成本较高。
Front Nutr. 2023 Aug 2;10:1220016. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1220016. eCollection 2023.
7
Knowledge, attitude, and patient advice on sustainable diets among Spanish health professionals.西班牙卫生专业人员对可持续饮食的认知、态度及患者建议
Front Nutr. 2023 Jul 17;10:1182226. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1182226. eCollection 2023.
8
Forced labour in US food supply chains.美国食品供应链中的强迫劳动。
Nat Food. 2023 Jul;4(7):545-546. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00796-9.
9
Forced labour risk is pervasive in the US land-based food supply.美国陆地食品供应中普遍存在强迫劳动风险。
Nat Food. 2023 Jul;4(7):596-606. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00794-x. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
10
Low-carbon diets can reduce global ecological and health costs.低碳饮食可以降低全球生态和健康成本。
Nat Food. 2023 May;4(5):394-406. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00749-2. Epub 2023 May 15.