Calhoun Amanda J, Martin Andrés, Adigun Ayodola, Alleyne Shirley D, Aneni Kammarauche, Thompson-Felix Tara, Asnes Andrea, de Carvalho-Filho Marco A, Benoit Laelia, Genao Inginia
Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2023 Apr 14;13:4. doi: 10.12688/mep.19487.2. eCollection 2023.
Background Racist interactions in clinical practice remain a pervasive reality for Black healthcare providers. We sought to develop a framework to inform supervisors' actions when confronting racism in clinical practice and protecting trainees under their oversight. Methods We conducted a qualitative study in which experienced supervisors responded to seven short, videotaped interactions between: 1) Black trainees and a simulated patient (SP) in a racist role; 2) the trainees and their respective supervisors; and 3) the trainees and their supervisors together with the SP. The clinical exchanges exemplified different types of racist or antiracist behaviors by the supervisors. After viewing each clip, participants wrote their reflections confidentially; they later joined a structured debriefing together. We used thematic analysis to identify supervisors' behavioral patterns when confronting racist interactions. Results Based on the input of 52 participants recruited into five two-hour-long sessions, we categorized the behaviors of supervisors facing anti-Black racial injuries involving learners under their oversight. We organized supervisor behaviors into five interlocking domains, each with a range of possible themes: 1) : from conciliatory to confrontational in communicating with the aggressor; 2) : from avoiding to naming racism; 3) : from individual to shared responsibility of the event and the response to it; 4) from excusing to including the aggrieved party when confronting the aggressor; and 5) : from protective to paternalistic in supporting the learner's autonomy. Conclusions Our qualitative findings can provide a framework for facilitated discussion toward reflective practice among healthcare providers who may have experienced, witnessed, or intervened in anti-Black racist interactions. They can also help medical educators to inform faculty development to fight anti-Black racism in clinical practice. The video materials we developed are available for viewing and download and can be used or adapted as springboards for reflective discussion or faculty development activities.
在临床实践中,种族主义互动对于黑人医疗服务提供者而言仍然是普遍存在的现实。我们试图制定一个框架,为监督者在临床实践中应对种族主义以及保护其监督下的实习生提供指导。方法:我们开展了一项定性研究,让经验丰富的监督者对三段简短的录像互动做出回应,这三段互动分别是:1)黑人实习生与扮演种族主义角色的模拟患者(SP)之间的互动;2)实习生与他们各自的监督者之间的互动;3)实习生及其监督者与模拟患者一起的互动。这些临床交流展现了监督者不同类型的种族主义或反种族主义行为。观看每个片段后,参与者私下写下他们的反思;之后他们一起参加了结构化的汇报会。我们采用主题分析法来确定监督者在面对种族主义互动时的行为模式。结果:基于招募到的52名参与者在五个两小时时长的环节中的反馈,我们对监督者在面对涉及受其监督的学习者的反黑人种族伤害时的行为进行了分类。我们将监督者的行为组织成五个相互关联的领域,每个领域都有一系列可能的主题:1)沟通方式:在与攻击者沟通时从安抚到对抗;2)对种族主义的处理:从回避到指明种族主义;3)责任承担:从个人对事件及其应对的责任到共同责任;4)面对攻击者时对受害者的态度:从为攻击者辩解到将受害者纳入其中;5)对学习者自主性的支持:从保护到家长式作风。结论:我们的定性研究结果可以为医疗服务提供者之间促进反思性实践的讨论提供一个框架,这些提供者可能经历过、目睹过或干预过反黑人种族主义互动。它们还可以帮助医学教育工作者为教师发展提供信息,以对抗临床实践中的反黑人种族主义。我们开发的视频材料可供观看和下载,可作为反思性讨论或教师发展活动的跳板使用或改编。