Evans B G
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Feb;36(283):54-6.
As part of wider review, this study examines the pattern of referrals to the emergency bed service from seven selected health districts in London over a six-month period. A 12-fold variation in the use of the emergency bed service was found between the different districts. Half the referrals to the service were made by doctors working in deputizing services, less than 1% of referrals were due to inter-hospital transfers and half the referrals were made by general practitioners. A few general practitioners were high users: 46% of the general practitioner referrals were accounted for by only 5% of the practitioners.The second part of the study concerned a questionnaire survey of a sample of general practitioners in the seven health districts (n = 963) and an 83% response rate was achieved. Almost three-quarters of the respondents did not use the emergency bed service. Wide variation between the different health districts was again demonstrated. In spite of the variations described, the survey revealed a continuing demand for the service by general practitioners.
作为更广泛审查的一部分,本研究调查了伦敦七个选定卫生区在六个月内转诊至急诊床位服务的模式。不同区之间急诊床位服务的使用情况存在12倍的差异。该服务的转诊中有一半是由从事代理服务的医生提出的,不到1%的转诊是由于医院间的转院,另一半转诊是由全科医生提出的。少数全科医生是高使用者:仅5%的从业者就占了全科医生转诊的46%。研究的第二部分涉及对七个卫生区的全科医生样本(n = 963)进行问卷调查,回复率达到83%。近四分之三的受访者未使用急诊床位服务。不同卫生区之间再次呈现出很大差异。尽管存在上述差异,但调查显示全科医生对该服务仍有持续需求。