Rajkumar Natesan, Soundarrajan Dhanasekaran, Ram Gowtham, Dhanasekararaja Palanisami, Rajasekaran Shanmuganathan
Department of Orthopaedics, Ganga Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, 641043 India.
Indian J Orthop. 2023 Mar 2;57(5):679-688. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-00849-y. eCollection 2023 May.
Our study aims to analyze the outcomes of conversion total hip replacement (THR) done for failed hemiarthroplasty.
We retrospectively analyzed 104 consecutive patients who underwent conversion THR for failed hemiarthroplasty between January 2012 and December 2018. The patient's records were analyzed for demographic information, index surgery details, preoperative functional status, and perioperative complications. Patients were analyzed according to the various modes of failure of hemiarthroplasty. The radiographs were analyzed for any progressive osteolysis, cup migration and stem subsidence. All the patients were evaluated using the modified Harris hip score (HHS) for clinical outcome. Complications, revision or reoperation in the follow-up period was recorded.
A total of 73 patients were included in the study for final analysis after exclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 48.2 ± 29.6 months. There was a significant improvement in mean HHS from 38.5 ± 9.1 preoperatively to 80.9 ± 4.3 at the last follow-up ( < 0.05). The different modes of failure had no statistically significant difference in the postoperative Harris hip score ( = 0.393). None of the patients had progressive radiolucent lines more than 2 mm or significant subsidence in the final follow-up compared to the initial postoperative radiograph. There was one deep infection, one patient had grade 2 heterotopic ossification, intraoperative calcar fracture was fixed with cerclage wiring in 11 patients, and postoperative periprosthetic fracture in two patients was treated with plate osteosynthesis. There were no neurovascular complications or dislocation during the follow-up.
Conversion THR for failed hemiarthroplasty is a challenging procedure and results in good functional outcome and provides reliable pain relief. Conversion THA for septic loosening by two stage revision have comparable postoperative outcomes like THA for aseptic loosening. Caution is required owing to high incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture during conversion THA. Dislocation rate is negligible even with smaller head provided the prosthesis is implanted in the proper orientation and adequate soft tissue balancing is achieved.
本研究旨在分析半髋关节置换术失败后行全髋关节置换术(THR)翻修的结果。
我们回顾性分析了2012年1月至2018年12月期间连续接受半髋关节置换术失败后行THR翻修的104例患者。分析患者记录中的人口统计学信息、初次手术细节、术前功能状态和围手术期并发症。根据半髋关节置换术的不同失败模式对患者进行分析。分析X线片有无进行性骨溶解、髋臼假体移位和股骨柄下沉。所有患者均采用改良Harris髋关节评分(HHS)评估临床结局。记录随访期间的并发症、翻修或再次手术情况。
排除标准后,共有73例患者纳入最终分析。平均随访时间为48.2±29.6个月。平均HHS评分从术前的38.5±9.1显著提高到末次随访时的80.9±4.3(<0.05)。不同失败模式在术后Harris髋关节评分上无统计学显著差异(=0.393)。与术后初始X线片相比,末次随访时无一例患者出现超过2mm的进行性透亮线或明显下沉。发生1例深部感染,1例患者出现2级异位骨化,11例患者术中股骨距骨折采用环扎钢丝固定,2例患者术后假体周围骨折采用钢板内固定治疗。随访期间无神经血管并发症或脱位发生。
半髋关节置换术失败后行THR翻修是一项具有挑战性的手术,功能结局良好,能可靠缓解疼痛。二期翻修治疗感染性松动的THA翻修术后结果与无菌性松动的THA相当。由于THA翻修术中假体周围骨折发生率高,需要谨慎操作。即使使用较小的股骨头,只要假体植入方向正确且实现了足够平衡的软组织,脱位率也可忽略不计。