文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

我们能否预测哪些严重哮喘患者将从生物制剂治疗中获益最大?两项 3 期临床试验的事后分析。

Can we predict who will benefit most from biologics in severe asthma? A post-hoc analysis of two phase 3 trials.

机构信息

Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, MD1 - Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, Singapore, 117549, Singapore.

The Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Respir Res. 2023 May 2;24(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02409-2.


DOI:10.1186/s12931-023-02409-2
PMID:37131185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10155396/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individualized prediction of treatment response may improve the value proposition of advanced treatment options in severe asthma. This study aimed to investigate the combined capacity of patient characteristics in predicting treatment response to mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma. METHODS: Patient-level data were pooled from two multinational phase 3 trials of mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma. We fitted penalized regression models to quantify reductions in the rate of severe exacerbations and the 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ5) score. The capacity of 15 covariates towards predicting treatment response was quantified by the Gini index (measuring disparities in treatment benefit) as well as observed treatment benefit within the quintiles of predicted treatment benefit. RESULTS: There was marked variability in the ability of patient characteristics to predict treatment response; covariates explained greater heterogeneity in predicting treatment response to asthma control than to exacerbation frequency (Gini index 0.35 v. 0.24). Key predictors for treatment benefit for severe exacerbations included exacerbation history, blood eosinophil count, baseline ACQ5 score and age, and those for symptom control included blood eosinophil count and presence of nasal polyps. Overall, the average reduction in exacerbations was 0.90/year (95%CI, 0.87‒0.92) and average reduction in ACQ5 score was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.02‒0.35). Among the top 20% of patients for predicted treatment benefit, exacerbations were reduced by 2.23/year (95% CI, 2.03‒2.43) and ACQ5 score were reduced by 0.59 (95% CI, 0.19‒0.98). Among the bottom 20% of patients for predicted treatment benefit, exacerbations were reduced by 0.25/year (95% CI, 0.16‒0.34) and ACQ5 by -0.20 (95% CI, -0.51 to 0.11). CONCLUSION: A precision medicine approach based on multiple patient characteristics can guide biologic therapy in severe asthma, especially in identifying patients who will not benefit as much from therapy. Patient characteristics had a greater capacity to predict treatment response to asthma control than to exacerbation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01691521 (registered September 24, 2012) and NCT01000506 (registered October 23, 2009).

摘要

背景:个体化预测治疗反应可能会提高重度哮喘中先进治疗方案的价值主张。本研究旨在探讨患者特征在预测美泊利珠单抗治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘中的联合能力。

方法:从两项美泊利珠单抗治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的多中心 3 期临床试验中汇总患者水平数据。我们使用惩罚回归模型来量化严重加重事件的发生率和 5 项哮喘控制问卷(ACQ5)评分的降低程度。通过基尼指数(衡量治疗获益差异)以及预测治疗获益五分位数内的观察治疗获益来量化 15 个协变量预测治疗反应的能力。

结果:患者特征预测治疗反应的能力存在显著差异;协变量在预测哮喘控制的治疗反应方面比预测加重频率的异质性更大(基尼指数 0.35 比 0.24)。严重加重的治疗获益的关键预测因素包括加重史、血嗜酸性粒细胞计数、基线 ACQ5 评分和年龄,而症状控制的预测因素包括血嗜酸性粒细胞计数和鼻息肉的存在。总体而言,平均每年严重加重减少 0.90/年(95%CI,0.87-0.92),ACQ5 评分平均降低 0.18(95%CI,0.02-0.35)。在预测治疗获益最高的 20%的患者中,每年严重加重减少 2.23/年(95%CI,2.03-2.43),ACQ5 评分降低 0.59(95%CI,0.19-0.98)。在预测治疗获益最低的 20%的患者中,每年严重加重减少 0.25/年(95%CI,0.16-0.34),ACQ5 评分降低 0.20(95%CI,-0.51 至 0.11)。

结论:基于多种患者特征的精准医学方法可以指导重度哮喘中的生物治疗,特别是在确定不太可能从治疗中获益的患者方面。患者特征预测治疗反应的能力对哮喘控制的治疗反应比对加重的治疗反应更强。

试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT01691521(2012 年 9 月 24 日注册)和 NCT01000506(2009 年 10 月 23 日注册)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a111/10155396/3769eb52259e/12931_2023_2409_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a111/10155396/e409421516a0/12931_2023_2409_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a111/10155396/0c19836e1454/12931_2023_2409_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a111/10155396/3769eb52259e/12931_2023_2409_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a111/10155396/e409421516a0/12931_2023_2409_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a111/10155396/0c19836e1454/12931_2023_2409_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a111/10155396/3769eb52259e/12931_2023_2409_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Can we predict who will benefit most from biologics in severe asthma? A post-hoc analysis of two phase 3 trials.

Respir Res. 2023-5-2

[2]
Severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab stratified by baseline eosinophil thresholds: a secondary analysis of the DREAM and MENSA studies.

Lancet Respir Med. 2016-5-10

[3]
Evaluation of Potential Continuation Rules for Mepolizumab Treatment of Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017-12-16

[4]
Baseline blood eosinophil count as a predictor of treatment response to the licensed dose of mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma.

Respir Med. 2019-11-3

[5]
Benefit of switching to mepolizumab from omalizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma based on patient characteristics.

Respir Res. 2021-5-10

[6]
Disease burden and efficacy of mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma and blood eosinophil counts of ≥150-300 cells/μL.

Respir Med. 2019-4-8

[7]
Ability of Serum IgE Concentration to Predict Exacerbation Risk and Benralizumab Efficacy for Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.

Adv Ther. 2019-12-14

[8]
Cluster analysis and characterization of response to mepolizumab. A step closer to personalized medicine for patients with severe asthma.

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014-9

[9]
Mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma (DREAM): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Lancet. 2012-8-18

[10]
The clinical benefit of mepolizumab replacing omalizumab in uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma.

Allergy. 2019-7-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Real-world evidence on biologic use in paediatric asthma: there but not there yet?

ERJ Open Res. 2025-6-23

[2]
An Updated Systematic Review on Asthma Exacerbation Risk Prediction Models Between 2017 and 2023: Risk of Bias and Applicability.

J Asthma Allergy. 2025-4-19

[3]
Epigenetic patient stratification via contrastive machine learning refines hallmark biomarkers in minoritized children with asthma.

Res Sq. 2024-9-13

本文引用的文献

[1]
Characterization of Patients in the International Severe Asthma Registry with High Steroid Exposure Who Did or Did Not Initiate Biologic Therapy.

J Asthma Allergy. 2022-10-21

[2]
Assessment of Real-World Escalation to Biologics in US Patients With Asthma.

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022-11

[3]
Global Variability in Administrative Approval Prescription Criteria for Biologic Therapy in Severe Asthma.

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022-5

[4]
Long-Term Therapy Response to Anti-IL-5 Biologics in Severe Asthma-A Real-Life Evaluation.

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021-3

[5]
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of mepolizumab as add-on therapy to standard of care for severe eosinophilic asthma in Singapore.

J Asthma. 2022-1

[6]
Suboptimal treatment response to anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies in severe eosinophilic asthmatics with airway autoimmune phenomena.

Eur Respir J. 2020-10-8

[7]
Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model.

BMJ. 2020-3-18

[8]
Mepolizumab effectiveness and identification of super-responders in severe asthma.

Eur Respir J. 2020-5

[9]
Quantifying changes in global health inequality: the Gini and Slope Inequality Indices applied to the Global Burden of Disease data, 1990-2017.

BMJ Glob Health. 2019-9-24

[10]
Economic burden of multimorbidity in patients with severe asthma: a 20-year population-based study.

Thorax. 2019-9-18

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索