Rural Medical Education Australia, Toowoomba, Australia.
University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 2;23(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04249-6.
Assessment of cultural safety in general practice consultations for Indigenous patients is a complex notion. Design and development of any assessment tool needs to be cognizant that cultural safety is determined by Indigenous peoples and incorporates defined components of cultural safety and current educational theory. Consideration of how social, historical, and political determinants of health and well-being impact upon the cultural safety of a consultation is also important. Given this complexity, we assume that no single method of assessment will be adequate to determine if general practice (GP) registrars are demonstrating or delivering culturally safe care. As such, we propose that development and assessment of cultural safety can be conceptualised using a model that considers these variables. From this, we aim to develop a tool to assess whether GP registrars are conducting a culturally safe consultation, where cultural safety is determined by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
This protocol will be situated in a pragmatic philosophical position to explore cultural safety primarily from the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients' perspective with triangulation and validation of findings with the GP and GP registrar perspective, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community, and the medical education community. The study will integrate both quantitative and qualitative data through three sequential phases. Data collection will be through survey, semi-structured interviews, an adapted nominal group technique, and a Delphi questionnaire. We aim to recruit approximately 40 patient and 20 GP participants for interviews, conduct one to five nominal groups (seven to 35 participants) and recruit fifteen participants for the Delphi process. Data will be analysed through a content analysis approach to identify components of an assessment of cultural safety for GP registrars.
This study will be one of the first to explore how cultural safety, as determined by Indigenous peoples, can be assessed in general practice consultations. This protocol is shared to stimulate awareness and discussion around this significant issue and prompt other studies in this area.
评估原住民患者在全科医生咨询中的文化安全性是一个复杂的概念。任何评估工具的设计和开发都需要认识到,文化安全性是由原住民决定的,并包含文化安全性的定义组成部分和当前的教育理论。考虑社会、历史和政治因素如何影响健康和福祉,以及这些因素如何影响咨询的文化安全性,也很重要。考虑到这种复杂性,我们假设没有单一的评估方法可以确定全科医生(GP)住院医师是否表现出或提供了文化安全的护理。因此,我们提出可以使用考虑这些变量的模型来概念化文化安全性的开发和评估。在此基础上,我们旨在开发一种工具,以评估 GP 住院医师是否进行了文化安全的咨询,其中文化安全性是由澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民决定的。
本方案将基于实用主义哲学立场,主要从澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民患者的角度探索文化安全性,并通过与全科医生和 GP 住院医师、原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区以及医学教育界的观点进行三角测量和验证研究结果,对文化安全性进行探索。该研究将通过三个连续阶段整合定量和定性数据。数据收集将通过调查、半结构化访谈、改编的名义小组技术和 Delphi 问卷调查进行。我们计划招募大约 40 名患者和 20 名全科医生参与访谈,进行一到五次名义小组(7 到 35 名参与者),并招募 15 名参与者参加 Delphi 流程。数据将通过内容分析方法进行分析,以确定评估 GP 住院医师文化安全性的组成部分。
这项研究将是第一个探索原住民决定的文化安全性如何在全科医生咨询中进行评估的研究之一。本方案旨在引起人们对这一重要问题的认识和讨论,并促使该领域的其他研究。