• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估医学生综合临床沟通技巧:定制评估工具的开发。

Assessment of medical students' integrated clinical communication skills: development of a tailor-made assessment tool.

机构信息

Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Dept. Primary and Community Care (161), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Departement of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2019 Apr 29;19(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1557-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-019-1557-3
PMID:31035995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6489308/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since patient-centered communication is directly connected to clinical performance, it should be integrated with medical knowledge and clinical skills. Therefore, clinical communication skills should be trained and assessed as an integral part of the student's clinical performance. We were unable to identify a tool, which helps when assessing patient-centered communication skills as an integrated component of medical history taking ('the integrated medical interview'). Therefore, we decided to design a new tailor-made assessment tool, the BOCC (BeOordeling Communicatie en Consultvoering (Dutch), Assessment of Communication and Consultation (English) to help raters assess students' integrated clinical communication skills with the emphasis on patient-centred communication combined with the correct medical content. This is a first initiative to develop such a tool, and this paper describes the first steps in this process.

METHODS

We investigated the tool in a group of third-year medical students (n = 672) interviewing simulated patients. Internal structure and internal consistency were assessed. Regression analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between scores on the instrument and general grading. Applicability to another context was tested in a group of fourth-year medical students (n = 374).

RESULTS

PCA showed five components (Communication skills, Problem clarification, Specific History, Problem influence and Integration Skills) with various Cronbach's alpha scores. The component Problem Clarification made the strongest unique contribution to the grade prediction. Applicability was good when investigated in another context.

CONCLUSIONS

The BOCC is designed to help raters assess students' integrated communication skills. It was assessed on internal structure and internal consistency. This tool is the first step in the assessment of the integrated medical interview and a basis for further investigation to reform it into a true measurement instrument on clinical communication skills.

摘要

背景

由于以患者为中心的沟通直接与临床绩效相关,因此应将其与医学知识和临床技能相结合。因此,临床沟通技巧应作为学生临床绩效的一个组成部分进行培训和评估。我们无法确定一种工具,可以在评估作为病史采集的综合组成部分的以患者为中心的沟通技巧时提供帮助(“综合医学访谈”)。因此,我们决定设计一种新的定制评估工具,即 BOCC(荷兰语中的 BeOordeling Communicatie en Consultvoering,英语中的 Assessment of Communication and Consultation),以帮助评估者评估学生的综合临床沟通技巧,重点是关注患者的沟通技巧与正确的医学内容相结合。这是开发此类工具的首次尝试,本文介绍了该过程的第一步。

方法

我们在一组三年级医学生(n=672)中对模拟患者进行了访谈,对该工具进行了研究。评估了内部结构和内部一致性。进行回归分析以调查仪器得分与总体评分之间的关系。在另一组四年级医学生(n=374)中测试了其适用性。

结果

主成分分析显示,有五个组成部分(沟通技巧、问题澄清、特定病史、问题影响和综合技能),具有不同的 Cronbach's alpha 得分。问题澄清这一组成部分对成绩预测的贡献最大。在另一种情况下进行调查时,适用性良好。

结论

BOCC 旨在帮助评估者评估学生的综合沟通技巧。评估了其内部结构和内部一致性。该工具是评估综合医学访谈的第一步,也是进一步研究将其改造成真正的临床沟通技能测量工具的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061f/6489308/746431f5ce6d/12909_2019_1557_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061f/6489308/746431f5ce6d/12909_2019_1557_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061f/6489308/746431f5ce6d/12909_2019_1557_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of medical students' integrated clinical communication skills: development of a tailor-made assessment tool.评估医学生综合临床沟通技巧:定制评估工具的开发。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Apr 29;19(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1557-3.
2
The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.IDEA评估工具:评估医学生住院病历中展示的报告、诊断推理和决策技能。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):163-73. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011654.
3
Longitudinal effects of medical students' communication skills on future performance.医学生沟通技巧对未来表现的纵向影响。
Mil Med. 2015 Apr;180(4 Suppl):24-30. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00565.
4
'Thinking on my feet': an improvisation course to enhance students' confidence and responsiveness in the medical interview.“随机应变”:一门提升学生在医学面试中自信心与反应能力的即兴课程。
Educ Prim Care. 2013 Feb;24(2):119-24. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11493466.
5
Assessing medical students' communication skills by the use of standardized patients: emphasizing standardized patients' quality assurance.通过使用标准化病人评估医学生的沟通技巧:强调标准化病人的质量保证。
Acad Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;38(3):354-60. doi: 10.1007/s40596-014-0066-2. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
6
Medical Students' Progress in Detecting and Interpreting Visual and Auditory Clinical Findings.医学生在检测和解释视觉及听觉临床发现方面的进展。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Aug-Sep;32(4):380-388. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1749636. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
7
First-year medical students' assessment of their own communication skills: a video-based, open-ended approach.一年级医学生对自身沟通技巧的评估:一种基于视频的开放式方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Oct;68(2):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.018. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
8
Consultation skills of medical students before and after changes in curriculum.课程改革前后医学生的会诊技能。
J R Soc Med. 2000 May;93(5):247-53. doi: 10.1177/014107680009300509.
9
Assessing students' communication skills: validation of a global rating.评估学生的沟通技巧:整体评分的验证
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Dec;13(5):583-92. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9074-2. Epub 2007 Jul 17.
10
Toward validation of an assessment tool designed to measure medical students' integration of scientific knowledge and clinical communication skills.旨在衡量医学生科学知识与临床沟通技能整合情况的评估工具的验证研究
Eval Health Prof. 2003 Jun;26(2):222-33. doi: 10.1177/0163278703026002006.

引用本文的文献

1
The 7 Elements Communication Rating Form for Teaching and Assessing Medical Communication Competency.用于教学和评估医学沟通能力的7要素沟通评分表
Cureus. 2024 Apr 25;16(4):e59008. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59008. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Assessing cultural safety in general practice consultations for Indigenous patients: protocol for a mixed methods sequential embedded design study.评估全科医生为原住民患者提供诊疗服务时的文化安全程度:一项混合方法序贯嵌入式设计研究的方案。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 2;23(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04249-6.
3
Student characteristics associated with interpersonal skills in medical consultations.

本文引用的文献

1
Do coursework summative assessments predict clinical performance? A systematic review.课程总结性评估能否预测临床能力?一项系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Feb 16;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0878-3.
2
Assessing Communication Skills of Medical Students in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE)--A Systematic Review of Rating Scales.在客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)中评估医学生的沟通技巧——评分量表的系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152717. eCollection 2016.
3
Reliability and validity of OSCE checklists used to assess the communication skills of undergraduate medical students: A systematic review.
学生特征与医学咨询中的人际沟通技能相关。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 3;22(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03412-9.
4
An update on the novel approaches towards skills assessment of ophthalmology residents in the Indian scenario.印度眼科住院医师技能评估新方法的最新进展。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr;70(4):1092-1098. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1034_21.
5
Case item creation and video case presentation as summative assessment tools for distance learning in the pandemic era.病例项目创建和视频病例展示作为大流行时代远程学习的总结性评估工具。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Jul;77(Suppl 2):S466-S474. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.05.018. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
6
Creating a culture of communication in undergraduate medical education.在本科医学教育中营造沟通文化。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2020 Apr 20;33(3):485-491. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1746156. eCollection 2020 Jul.
用于评估本科医学生沟通技巧的客观结构化临床考试清单的信度和效度:一项系统评价
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun 27. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.004.
4
Measurement of physician-patient communication--a systematic review.医患沟通的测量——一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 22;9(12):e112637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112637. eCollection 2014.
5
Professionalism: good for patients and health care organizations.专业精神:对患者和医疗机构都有益。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 May;89(5):644-52. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.011.
6
The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.专业能力评估:发展、研究与实际影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1996 Jan;1(1):41-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00596229.
7
Bridging the gap: How is integrating communication skills with medical content throughout the curriculum valued by students?弥合差距:在整个课程中整合沟通技巧和医学内容如何得到学生的重视?
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Feb;90(2):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.12.004. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
8
Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.以患者为中心的护理与结局:文献系统评价。
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Aug;70(4):351-79. doi: 10.1177/1077558712465774. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
9
Development and validation of the "FrOCK": Frankfurt observer communication checklist.“FrOCK”(法兰克福观察者沟通清单)的开发与验证
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(8):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Sep 16.
10
A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose.适合目的的计划性评估模型。
Med Teach. 2012;34(3):205-14. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239.