School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Centre for Social Research in Health (CSRH), University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1505-1513. doi: 10.1111/hex.13751. Epub 2023 May 3.
Peer-to-peer communication approaches have been previously described as the 'power of personal referral'. Rather than relying on official channels of information, peer-to-peer communication may have a role in supporting changes in understanding and possibly behaviours. However, in emergency or pandemic situations, there is currently limited understanding of whether community members feel comfortable speaking about their vaccine experiences or advocating to others. This study explored the perceptions of COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated Australian adults regarding their preferences and opinions about peer-peer communication and other vaccine communication strategies.
Qualitative interview research.
In-depth interviews were conducted in September 2021 with 41 members of the Australian community. Thirty-three participants self-identified as being vaccinated against COVID-19, while the remainder were not vaccinated at the time or did not intend on receiving a COVID vaccine.
Amongst those who were vaccinated, participants spoke about being willing to promote the vaccine and correct misinformation and felt empowered following their vaccination. They highlighted the importance of peer-to-peer communication and community messaging, expressing the need for both strategies in an immunisation promotional campaign, with a slight emphasis on the persuasive power of communication between family and friends. However, those who were unvaccinated tended to dismiss the role of community messaging, commenting on a desire not to be like one of the many who listened to the advice of others.
During emergency situations, governments and other relevant community organisations should consider harnessing peer-to-peer communication amongst motivated individuals as a health communication intervention. However further work is needed to understand the support that this constituent-involving strategy requires.
Participants were invited to participate through a series of online promotional pathways including emails and social media posts. Those who completed the expression of interest and met the study criteria were contacted and sent the full study participant information documentation. A time for a 30 min semi-structured interview was set and provided with a $50 gift voucher at the conclusion.
点对点通信方法以前被描述为“个人推荐的力量”。与依赖官方信息渠道不同,点对点通信可能在支持理解和行为变化方面发挥作用。然而,在紧急情况或大流行情况下,目前对于社区成员是否愿意谈论他们的疫苗接种经验或向他人宣传疫苗,了解有限。本研究探讨了澳大利亚接种和未接种 COVID-19 疫苗的成年人对其对点对点通信和其他疫苗沟通策略的偏好和意见的看法。
定性访谈研究。
2021 年 9 月,对澳大利亚社区的 41 名成员进行了深入访谈。33 名参与者自我认定接种了 COVID-19 疫苗,而其余参与者当时未接种疫苗或不打算接种 COVID 疫苗。
在接种疫苗的人群中,参与者表示愿意宣传疫苗和纠正错误信息,并在接种疫苗后感到有力量。他们强调了点对点通信和社区信息传递的重要性,表达了在免疫宣传活动中需要这两种策略的必要性,稍微强调了家庭成员和朋友之间沟通的说服力。然而,未接种疫苗的人往往会忽视社区信息传递的作用,评论说不想成为听从他人建议的众多人中的一员。
在紧急情况下,政府和其他相关社区组织应考虑利用有积极性的个人之间的点对点通信作为一种健康沟通干预措施。但是,需要进一步研究以了解这种由参与者组成的策略所需要的支持。
通过电子邮件和社交媒体帖子等一系列在线宣传途径邀请参与者参与。那些完成了表达兴趣并符合研究标准的人被联系并发送了完整的研究参与者信息文件。为 30 分钟的半结构化访谈安排了时间,并在结束时提供了 50 美元的礼品券。