Cone contrast test-HD: sensitivity and specificity in red-green dichromacy and the impact of age.

We report normative cone contrast sensitivity values, right-left eye agreement, and sensitivity and specificity values for the cone contrast test-HD (CCT-HD). We included 100 phakic eyes with color vision normal (CVN) and 20 dichromatic eyes (10 with protanopia and 10 with deuteranopia). The CCT-HD was used to measure L, M, and S-CCT-HD scores, and the right and left eyes were evaluated for agreement using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman analysis to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of the CCT-HD based on diagnosis with an anomaloscope device. All cone types were in moderate agreement with the CCC (L-cone: 0.92, 95% CI, 0.86-0.95; M-cone: 0.91, 95% CI, 0.84-0.94; S-cone: 0.93, 95% CI, 0.88-0.96), whereas the Bland-Altman plots showed that the majority of cases (L-cone: 94%; M-cone: 92%; S-cone: 92%) fell within the 95% limits of agreement and showed good agreement. The ± error L, M, and S-CCT-HD scores for protanopia were 0.6±1.4, 74.7±2.7, and 94.6±2.4, respectively; for deuteranopia, these were 84.0±3.4, 40.8±3.3, and 93.0±5.8, respectively; and for age-matched CVN eyes ( ± deviation age, 53.1±5.8 years; age range, 45-64 years), these were 98.5±3.4, 94.8±3.8, and 92.3±3.4, respectively, with significant differences between the groups except for S-CCT-HD score (Bonferroni corrected =0.0167, <0.0167). The sensitivity and specificity of the CCT-HD were 100% for protan and deutan in diagnosing abnormal types in those aged 20 to 64 years; however, the specificity decreased to 65% for protan and 55% for deutan in those aged >65 years. The CCT-HD is comparable to the diagnostic performance of the anomaloscope in the 20-64-year-old age group. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously in those ≥65 years, as these patients are more susceptible to acquired color vision deficiencies due to yellowing of the crystalline lens and other factors.