Suppr超能文献

评估 Rabin 锥体对比试验在正常眼或人工晶状体眼及严重双色眼中的临床有效性。

Evaluation of clinical validity of the Rabin cone contrast test in normal phakic or pseudophakic eyes and severely dichromatic eyes.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;96(2):e164-e167. doi: 10.1111/aos.13495. Epub 2017 May 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical validity of the Rabin cone contrast test (RCCT; Innova Systems, Inc.) in patients with normal phakic/pseudophakic eyes and severe dichromatic colour vision deficiency (CVD).

METHODS

We evaluated age-related changes in the RCCT scores in 166 phakic eyes and 34 pseudophakic eyes and the RCCT sensitivity and specificity in 28 men with severe dichromatic CVD (10 with protanopia, 18 with deutanopia) and nine age-matched controls. All participants had 20/20 or better Snellen best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The RCCT was used to measure the L, M and S-CCT scores (range, 0-100).

RESULTS

In normal phakic eyes, the mean L, M and S-CCT scores decreased gradually with ageing, with normal levels in patients in the second to seventh decades of life and some below normal in the eighth and ninth decades of life. In normal pseudophakic eyes, the mean L, M and S-CCT scores were normal in patients in the seventh to ninth decades of life. In eyes with severe CVD, the mean L, M and S-CCT scores were, respectively, 31.5 ± 18.3, 86.0 ± 12.6 and 98.0 ± 6.3 in patients with protanopia; 92.8 ± 10.5, 50.8 ± 19.6 and 97.8 ± 5.2 in patients with deutanopia; and 99.4 ± 1.7, 98.3 ± 5.0 and 99.4 ± 1.7 in controls. The RCCT sensitivity and specificity were 100% for diagnosing the CVD type.

CONCLUSION

The RCCT can be used in non-visually impaired patients up to the seventh decade of life and after cataract surgery in elderly patients. The RCCT is available for CVD screening and typing and the score has a wide distribution range even in patients with severe CVD.

摘要

目的

评估 Rabin 锥体对比测试(RCCT;Innova 系统公司)在正常有晶状体/人工晶状体眼和严重双色视觉缺陷(CVD)患者中的临床有效性。

方法

我们评估了 166 只有晶状体眼和 34 只人工晶状体眼中 RCCT 评分的年龄相关性变化,以及 28 名严重双色 CVD 男性患者(10 名红绿色盲,18 名绿色盲)和 9 名年龄匹配对照者的 RCCT 敏感性和特异性。所有参与者的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)均为 20/20 或更好。RCCT 用于测量 L、M 和 S-CCT 评分(范围为 0-100)。

结果

在正常有晶状体眼中,L、M 和 S-CCT 评分随年龄逐渐降低,第二至第七个十年的患者正常水平,第八和第九个十年的患者有些低于正常水平。在正常人工晶状体眼中,第七至第九个十年的患者的 L、M 和 S-CCT 评分正常。在严重 CVD 眼中,红绿色盲患者的 L、M 和 S-CCT 评分分别为 31.5±18.3、86.0±12.6 和 98.0±6.3;绿色盲患者分别为 92.8±10.5、50.8±19.6 和 97.8±5.2;对照组分别为 99.4±1.7、98.3±5.0 和 99.4±1.7。RCCT 的敏感性和特异性均为 100%,可用于诊断 CVD 类型。

结论

RCCT 可用于非视觉受损患者,直至第七个十年,以及老年白内障手术后患者。RCCT 可用于 CVD 筛查和分型,即使在严重 CVD 患者中,评分也具有广泛的分布范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d78a/5836892/9e897f832088/AOS-96-e164-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验