Suppr超能文献

根据临床和心理物理学特征对偏头痛患者进行分类:聚类分析方法。

Profiling migraine patients according to clinical and psychophysical characteristics: a cluster analysis approach.

机构信息

Department of Health Science and Technology, Center for Pain and Neuroplasticity (CNAP), SMI, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg 9220, Denmark.

Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa 16132, Italy.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2023 Sep 1;24(9):1046-1057. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad048.

Abstract

AIM

This study aims to profile migraine patients according clinical and psychophysical characteristics.

METHOD

In this observational study, two cohorts of migraine patients(episodic/chronic) were included. Cohort-1: ictal/perictal phase; Cohort-2: interictal phase.The following variables were assessed: headache frequency; disability; cervical active range of motion(AROM) in flexion, extension, right/left lateral flexion, right/left rotation; pressure-pain threshold(PPT) over: temporalis, two cervical areas(C1/C4 vertebral segments), and two distal pain-free areas(hand/leg). Cluster analysis was performed using the K-means algorithm. Differences across clusters were investigated.

RESULTS

Cohort-1: 100 patients were included, and two clusters were identified. Cluster-1.1 (19%), Cluster-1.2 (81%). Cluster 1.1 had a higher percentage of men (P = .037) and higher disability (P = .003) compared to Clusters 1.2. Cluster 1.2 had reduced AROM in flexion, extension, and left/right lateral flexion (P < .037), and lower PPT value in all areas (P < .001) compared to Cluster 1.1. Cohort-2: 98 patients were included and three clusters were identified. Cluster-2.1(18%), Cluster-2.2(45%), and Cluster-2.3(37%). Cluster-2.1 had a higher percentage of men compared to clusters-2.2 and 2.3 (P = .009). Cluster-2.3 had higher headache frequency, and disability compared to Cluster-2.2 (P < .006), and higher disability compared to Cluster-2.1 (P = .010). Cluster-2.3 had reduced AROM in all directions compared to Clusters-2.1 and 2.2 (P < .029). Clusters-2.2 and 2.3 have lower PPT values in all areas compared to Cluster-1.1 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In the Ictal/perictal phase, two clusters were identified according to clinical and psychophysical characteristics, with one group showing no psychophysical impairment and one with increased pain-sensitivity and cervical musculoskeletal-dysfunctions.In the interictal phase, three clusters could be identified, with one group showing no psychophysical impairment, one increased pain-sensitivity, and one increased pain sensitivity and cervical musculoskeletal-dysfunctions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在根据临床和心理物理学特征对偏头痛患者进行分析。

方法

在这项观察性研究中,纳入了两群偏头痛患者(发作性/慢性)。队列 1:发作期/发作间期;队列 2:间歇期。评估了以下变量:头痛频率;失能;颈椎主动活动度(屈伸、左右侧屈、左右旋转);颞肌、两个颈椎区(C1/C4 椎体节段)和两个无疼痛的远端区(手/腿)的压痛阈值(PPT)。采用 K-均值算法进行聚类分析。研究了不同簇之间的差异。

结果

队列 1:纳入了 100 例患者,识别出两个簇。簇 1.1(19%),簇 1.2(81%)。簇 1.1 中男性比例较高(P=.037),失能程度较高(P=.003),与簇 1.2 相比。簇 1.2 在前屈、后伸和左右侧屈的活动度降低(P<.037),所有区域的 PPT 值降低(P<.001),与簇 1.1 相比。队列 2:纳入了 98 例患者,识别出三个簇。簇 2.1(18%),簇 2.2(45%),和簇 2.3(37%)。簇 2.1 中的男性比例高于簇 2.2 和 2.3(P=.009)。簇 2.3 的头痛频率和失能程度高于簇 2.2(P<.006),高于簇 2.1(P=.010)。簇 2.3 在所有方向的颈椎活动度均低于簇 2.1 和 2.2(P<.029)。簇 2.2 和 2.3 在所有区域的 PPT 值均低于簇 1.1(P<.001)。

结论

在发作期/发作间期,根据临床和心理物理学特征识别出两个簇,一个组无心理物理学损伤,一个组疼痛敏感性增加,颈椎肌肉骨骼功能障碍。在间歇期,可以识别出三个簇,一个组无心理物理学损伤,一个组疼痛敏感性增加,一个组疼痛敏感性增加和颈椎肌肉骨骼功能障碍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验