Suppr超能文献

主动脉计算机断层扫描预测 B 型主动脉夹层

Computed Tomography Scan of the Aorta to Predict Type B Aortic Dissection.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Institute of Cardiothoracic Vascular Disease, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Mar;72(2):126-133. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-57026. Epub 2023 May 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to find the high-risk morphological features in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) population and to establish an early detection model.

METHODS

From June 2018 to February 2022, 234 patients came to our hospital because of chest pain. After examination and definite diagnosis, we excluded people with previous cardiovascular surgery history, connective tissue disease, aortic arch variation, valve malformation, and traumatic dissection. Finally, we included 49 patients in the TBAD group and 57 in the control group. The imaging data were retrospectively analyzed by Endosize (Therevna 3.1.40) software. The aortic morphological parameters mainly include diameter, length, direct distance, and tortuosity index. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed and systolic blood pressure (SBP), aortic diameter at the left common carotid artery (D3), and length of ascending aorta (L1) were chosen to build a model. The predictive capacity of the models was evaluated through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

The diameters in the ascending aorta and aortic arch are larger in the TBAD group (33.9 ± 5.9 vs. 37.8 ± 4.9 mm,  < 0.001; 28.2 ± 3.9 vs. 31.7 ± 3.0 mm,  < 0.001). The ascending aorta was significantly longer in the TBAD group (80.3 ± 11.7 vs. 92.3 ± 10.6 mm,  < 0.001). Besides, the direct distance and tortuosity index of the ascending aorta in the TBAD group increased significantly (69.8 ± 9.0 vs. 78.7 ± 8.8 mm,  < 0.001; 1.15 ± 0.05 vs. 1.17 ± 0.06,  < 0.05). Multivariable models demonstrated that SBP, aortic diameter at the left common carotid artery (D3), and length of ascending aorta (L1) were independent predictors of TBAD occurrence. Based on the ROC analysis, area under the ROC curve of the risk prediction models was 0.831.

CONCLUSION

Morphological characteristic including diameter of total aorta, length of ascending aorta, direct distance of ascending aorta, and tortuosity index of ascending aorta are valuable geometric risk factors. Our model shows a good performance in predicting the incidence of TBAD.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在寻找 B 型主动脉夹层(TBAD)人群中的高危形态学特征,并建立早期检测模型。

方法

2018 年 6 月至 2022 年 2 月,共有 234 名胸痛患者来我院就诊。经过检查和明确诊断,排除了既往心血管手术史、结缔组织疾病、主动脉弓变异、瓣膜畸形、外伤性夹层的患者。最终,TBAD 组纳入 49 例,对照组纳入 57 例。采用 Endosize(Therevna 3.1.40)软件对影像学资料进行回顾性分析。主动脉形态学参数主要包括直径、长度、直接距离和迂曲指数。采用多变量逻辑回归模型,选择收缩压(SBP)、左颈总动脉处主动脉直径(D3)和升主动脉长度(L1)建立模型。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估模型的预测能力。

结果

TBAD 组升主动脉和主动脉弓直径较大(33.9±5.9 比 37.8±4.9mm,  <0.001;28.2±3.9 比 31.7±3.0mm,  <0.001)。TBAD 组升主动脉明显较长(80.3±11.7 比 92.3±10.6mm,  <0.001)。此外,TBAD 组升主动脉的直接距离和迂曲指数明显增加(69.8±9.0 比 78.7±8.8mm,  <0.001;1.15±0.05 比 1.17±0.06,  <0.05)。多变量模型表明,SBP、左颈总动脉处主动脉直径(D3)和升主动脉长度(L1)是 TBAD 发生的独立预测因素。基于 ROC 分析,风险预测模型的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.831。

结论

包括总主动脉直径、升主动脉长度、升主动脉直接距离和升主动脉迂曲指数在内的形态学特征是有价值的几何危险因素。我们的模型在预测 TBAD 发生率方面表现出良好的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1a5/10914493/1effd71ad280/10-1055-s-0043-57026-i1120226757oc-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验