Song Sei Han, Choi Seung Ho, Park Hae Ri, Jeon Soo Yeon, Kim Seung Hyun
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Apr 25;16:2433-2439. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S405537. eCollection 2023.
Anesthesiologists are exposed to the risk of infection from various secretions or droplets from the respiratory tract of patients. We aimed to determine bacterial exposure to anesthesiologists' faces during endotracheal intubation and extubation.
Six resident anesthesiologists performed 66 intubation and 66 extubation procedures in patients undergoing elective otorhinolaryngology surgeries. Sampling was performed by swabbing the face shields twice in an overlapping slalom pattern, before and after each procedure. Samples for pre-intubation and pre-extubation were collected immediately after wearing the face shield at the time of anesthesia induction and at the end of the surgery, respectively. Post-intubation samples were collected after the injection of anesthetic drugs, positive pressure mask ventilation, endotracheal intubation, and confirmation of intubation success. Post-extubation samples were collected after endotracheal tube suction, oral suction, extubation, and confirmation of spontaneous breathing and stable vital signs. All swabs were cultured for 48 h, and bacterial growth was confirmed by colony forming unit (CFU) count.
There was no bacterial growth in either pre- or post-intubation bacterial cultures. In contrast, while there was no bacterial growth in pre-extubation samples, 15.2% of post-extubation samples were CFU+ (0/66 [0%] vs 10/66 [15.2%], =0.001). All the CFU+ samples belonged to 47 patients with post-extubation coughing, and the CFU count was correlated with the number of coughing episodes during the process of extubation (P < 0.01, correlation coefficient= 0.403).
The current study shows the actual chance of bacterial exposure to the anesthesiologist's face during the patient awakening process after general anesthesia. Given the correlation between the CFU count and the number of coughing episodes, we recommend anesthesiologists to use appropriate facial protection equipment during this procedure.
麻醉医生面临着因患者呼吸道各种分泌物或飞沫而感染的风险。我们旨在确定气管插管和拔管过程中麻醉医生面部的细菌暴露情况。
六名住院麻醉医生对接受择期耳鼻喉科手术的患者进行了66次插管和66次拔管操作。在每次操作前后,通过以重叠的曲折模式两次擦拭面罩进行采样。插管前和拔管前的样本分别在麻醉诱导时佩戴面罩后以及手术结束时立即采集。插管后样本在注射麻醉药物、正压面罩通气、气管插管并确认插管成功后采集。拔管后样本在气管内吸痰、口腔吸痰、拔管并确认自主呼吸和生命体征稳定后采集。所有拭子培养48小时,通过菌落形成单位(CFU)计数确认细菌生长。
插管前和插管后的细菌培养均未发现细菌生长。相比之下,拔管前样本未发现细菌生长,而15.2%的拔管后样本CFU呈阳性(0/66 [0%] 对10/66 [15.2%],P =0.001)。所有CFU呈阳性的样本均来自47例拔管后咳嗽的患者,CFU计数与拔管过程中的咳嗽次数相关(P < 0.01,相关系数 = 0.403)。
本研究显示了全身麻醉后患者苏醒过程中麻醉医生面部实际的细菌暴露机会。鉴于CFU计数与咳嗽次数之间的相关性,我们建议麻醉医生在此过程中使用适当的面部防护设备。