Xu Jian-qing, Zhu Bin, Ye Tie-hu, Ren Hong-zhi
Department of Anesthesiology, PUMC Hospital, CAMS and PUMC, Beijing 100730, China.
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2007 Aug;29(4):510-3.
To initially observe the effect of classical endotracheal intubation on endotracheal bacterial contamination and evaluate the validity of protective endotracheal intubation on reducing endotracheal bacterial contamination.
Ninety elective patients undergoing general anesthesia for hysterectomy were randomly assigned to two equal groups. Group II received endotracheal intubation protected by sterilized transparent sleeve while group I correspondingly adopted unprotective classical endotracheal intubation. Endotracheal swab sampling and bacterial counting were performed on the principle of aseptic processing before endotracheal intubation and extubation, respectively.
Bacteria were found in 62 of 180 samples. The difference of bacterial counting between before extubation and before intubation was (-0.3 +/- 35.6) 100 CFU/ ml in group II, lower than that in group I, which was (21.4 +/- 56.7) 100 CFU/ml (P<0.05).
Endotracheal bacterial contamination may be caused by unprotective classical endotracheal intubation and could be reduced by protective endotracheal intubation.
初步观察传统气管插管对气管内细菌污染的影响,并评估保护性气管插管在减少气管内细菌污染方面的有效性。
90例行子宫切除术的择期全麻患者被随机分为两组,每组人数相等。第二组采用无菌透明套管保护下的气管插管,而第一组相应地采用无保护的传统气管插管。分别在气管插管前和拔管前按照无菌操作原则进行气管内拭子采样和细菌计数。
180份样本中有62份检测到细菌。第二组拔管前与插管前细菌计数差值为(-0.3±35.6)×100 CFU/ml,低于第一组的(21.4±56.7)×100 CFU/ml(P<0.05)。
无保护的传统气管插管可能导致气管内细菌污染,而保护性气管插管可减少这种污染。