University of Granada, Faculty of Dentistry, Colegio Máximo de Cartuja s/n, Granada 18071, Spain.
Independent Research Scholar.
J Dent. 2021 Oct;113:103790. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103790. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to state the efficacy of local administration of antibiotics in the treatment of peri-implantitis in terms of peri-implant probing depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BoP) reduction.
DATA, SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted. Screening process was done using the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE by PubMed), Embase and the Cochrane Oral Health. Included articles were randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Weighted means were calculated. Heterogeneity was determined using Higgins (I2). Due to the encountered heterogeneity between the studies being combined, random-effects models were applied in order to analyze effect sizes. Twelve studies (365 patients and 463 implants) were included in the systematic review. After peri-implantitis treatment with local antibiotics, PPD was reduced 1.40 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.82-1.98). When local antibiotics were applied, a 0.30 mm higher reduction of PPD was obtained than in the control group (95% confidence interval: 0.07-0.53). BoP attained an odds ratio value of 1.82 (95% confidence interval: 1.09-3.04), indicating that the likehood of bleeding is almost two-fold when antibiotics are not locally administrated. Adverse effects were not found after applying local antibiotics.
The local antibiotic administration does reduce, without adverse effects, both peri-implant probing depths and bleeding on probing in patients affected by peri-implantitis, if compared to control groups without local antibiotic application.
Patients with dental implants frequently suffer from peri-implantitis. Clinical features of peri-implantitis lesions include the presence of bleeding on probing and increased peri-implant probing depths. Both BoP and PPD have become reduced after local administration of antibiotics.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是陈述局部应用抗生素治疗种植体周围炎在减少种植体探诊深度(PPD)和探诊出血(BoP)方面的疗效。
进行了电子和手动文献检索。使用国家医学图书馆(PubMed 中的 MEDLINE)、Embase 和 Cochrane 口腔健康进行筛选过程。纳入的文章为随机对照试验和观察性研究。计算了加权平均值。使用 Higgins(I2)确定异质性。由于所合并的研究之间存在异质性,因此应用随机效应模型来分析效应大小。共有 12 项研究(365 名患者和 463 个种植体)纳入系统评价。经过局部抗生素治疗种植体周围炎后,PPD 减少了 1.40 毫米(95%置信区间:0.82-1.98)。与对照组相比,局部应用抗生素时 PPD 的减少量高出 0.30 毫米(95%置信区间:0.07-0.53)。BoP 的比值比为 1.82(95%置信区间:1.09-3.04),表明在未局部应用抗生素时,出血的可能性几乎增加了两倍。局部应用抗生素后未发现不良反应。
与未局部应用抗生素的对照组相比,局部应用抗生素可减少种植体周围炎患者的探诊深度和探诊出血,且无不良反应。
患有牙种植体的患者常患有种植体周围炎。种植体周围炎病变的临床特征包括探诊出血和种植体探诊深度增加。局部应用抗生素后,BoP 和 PPD 均有所减少。