Koo Jenny, Kilicdag Hasan, Katheria Anup
Neonatal Research Institute, Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women & Newborns, San Diego, United States.
Divisions of Neonatology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Front Pediatr. 2023 Apr 18;11:1146057. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1146057. eCollection 2023.
The most common methods for providing additional placental blood to a newborn are delayed cord clamping (DCC) and umbilical cord milking (UCM). However, DCC carries the potential risk of hypothermia due to extended exposure to the cold environment in the operating room or delivery room, as well as a delay in performing resuscitation. As an alternative, umbilical cord milking (UCM) and delayed cord clamping with resuscitation (DCC-R) have been studied, as they allow for immediate resuscitation after birth. Given the relative ease of performing UCM compared to DCC-R, UCM is being strongly considered as a practical option in non-vigorous term and near-term neonates, as well as preterm neonates requiring immediate respiratory support. However, the safety profile of UCM, particularly in premature newborns, remains a concern. This review will highlight the currently known benefits and risks of umbilical cord milking and explore ongoing studies.
为新生儿提供额外胎盘血的最常见方法是延迟脐带结扎(DCC)和脐带挤血(UCM)。然而,由于在手术室或产房长时间暴露于寒冷环境,延迟脐带结扎存在体温过低的潜在风险,同时也会延迟进行复苏。作为一种替代方法,人们对脐带挤血(UCM)和延迟脐带结扎并进行复苏(DCC-R)进行了研究,因为它们能在出生后立即进行复苏。鉴于与延迟脐带结扎并进行复苏相比,脐带挤血操作相对简便,脐带挤血正被强烈视为足月和近足月非活力新生儿以及需要立即呼吸支持的早产儿的一种实用选择。然而,脐带挤血的安全性,尤其是对早产儿而言,仍然令人担忧。本综述将重点介绍目前已知的脐带挤血的益处和风险,并探讨正在进行的研究。