Women and Children's Hospital, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute and The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;
Cochrane Breast Cancer Group, Systematic Reviews and Health Technology Assessments National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Pediatrics. 2021 Mar;147(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-015404.
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation prioritized scientific review of umbilical cord management at term and late preterm birth.
To assess effects of umbilical cord management strategies (clamping timing and cord milking) in infants ≥34 weeks' gestational age.
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and trial registries searched July 2019.
Two authors independently assessed eligibility of randomized controlled trials.
Two authors independently extracted data and assessed evidence certainty (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations).
We identified 46 studies (9159 women and their infants) investigating 7 comparisons. Compared with early cord clamping (ECC) <30 seconds, delayed cord clamping (DCC) ≥30 seconds (33 studies), intact-cord milking (1 study), and cut-cord milking (2 studies) probably improve hematologic measures but may not affect survival without neurodisability, anemia in early infancy, or maternal postpartum hemorrhage. No differences in major neonatal morbidities are seen in studies comparing methods of optimizing placental transfusion (DCC versus cut-cord milking [3 studies], longer delays in clamping [7 studies], or physiologic parameters [3 studies]). Strategies that promote increased placental transfusion may be associated with greater phototherapy use. Evidence for all outcomes was low or very low certainty.
Incompleteness and low certainty of findings limit applicability.
Compared with ECC, DCC or cord milking increases hemoglobin and hematocrit immediately after birth in infants ≥34 weeks' gestational age. The uncertain effects of DCC and cord milking compared with ECC on major morbidities limit usefulness of available evidence for policy and practice.
复苏国际联络委员会优先审查了足月和晚期早产儿的脐带管理的科学审查。
评估≥34 周胎龄婴儿的脐带管理策略(夹闭时机和脐带挤奶)的效果。
Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、Medline、PubMed、Embase、护理学和联合健康文献累积索引,以及 2019 年 7 月检索的试验登记处。
两位作者独立评估随机对照试验的合格性。
两位作者独立提取数据并评估证据确定性(推荐评估、制定和评估分级)。
我们确定了 46 项研究(9159 名妇女及其婴儿),涉及 7 项比较。与早期脐带夹闭(ECC)<30 秒相比,延迟脐带夹闭(DCC)≥30 秒(33 项研究)、完整脐带挤奶(1 项研究)和切断脐带挤奶(2 项研究)可能改善血液学指标,但可能不会影响无神经功能障碍的存活率、婴儿早期贫血或产妇产后出血。比较优化胎盘输血方法的研究(DCC 与切断脐带挤奶[3 项研究]、更长的夹闭延迟[7 项研究]或生理参数[3 项研究])未发现主要新生儿发病率的差异。促进增加胎盘输血的策略可能与更多的光疗使用有关。所有结局的证据确定性均为低或极低。
研究结果不完整且确定性低,限制了其适用性。
与 ECC 相比,DCC 或脐带挤奶可增加≥34 周胎龄婴儿出生后即刻的血红蛋白和血细胞比容。DCC 和脐带挤奶与 ECC 相比对主要发病率的不确定影响限制了现有证据在政策和实践中的有用性。