• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续性心房颤动射频导管消融术后三尖瓣反流改善的预测因素和结果。

Predictors and outcomes of tricuspid regurgitation improvement after radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Jun;34(6):1360-1366. doi: 10.1111/jce.15919. Epub 2023 May 7.

DOI:10.1111/jce.15919
PMID:37149757
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Little has been reported on the predictors and outcomes of improvement of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

We enrolled 141 patients with persistent AF and moderate or severe TR assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) who underwent an initial RFCA between February 2015 and August 2021. These patients underwent follow-up TTE at 12 months after the RFCA, and were categorized into two groups based on the improvement (defined as at least one-grade improvement of TR) and non-improvement of TR: IM group and Non-IM group, respectively. We compared the patient characteristics, ablation procedures, and recurrences after the RFCA between the two groups. In addition, we examined the major event (defined as admission for heart failure or all-cause death) more than 12 months after the RFCA.

RESULTS

IM group consisted of 90 patients (64%). A multivariate analysis revealed that age <71 years old and absence of late recurrence (LR, defined as recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia between 3 and 12 months after the RFCA) were independently associated with the improvement of TR after the RFCA. Furthermore, IM group had the higher incidence of major event-free survival than Non-IM group.

CONCLUSIONS

Relatively young age and absence of LR were good predictors of improvement of TR after the RFCA for persistent AF. In addition, the improvement of TR was related to better clinical outcomes.

摘要

简介

关于持续性心房颤动(AF)射频导管消融(RFCA)后三尖瓣反流(TR)改善的预测因素和结果,鲜有报道。

方法

我们纳入了 141 例经胸超声心动图(TTE)评估为持续性 AF 合并中度或重度 TR 的患者,这些患者于 2015 年 2 月至 2021 年 8 月期间首次接受了 RFCA。这些患者在 RFCA 后 12 个月接受了随访 TTE,并根据 TR 的改善(定义为 TR 至少改善一个等级)和未改善(Non-IM 组)分为两组:IM 组和 Non-IM 组。我们比较了两组患者的特征、消融程序和 RFCA 后的复发情况。此外,我们检查了 RFCA 后 12 个月以上的主要事件(定义为因心力衰竭或全因死亡入院)。

结果

IM 组包括 90 例患者(64%)。多变量分析显示,年龄<71 岁和无晚期复发(LR,定义为 RFCA 后 3 至 12 个月发生的房性心动过速复发)与 RFCA 后 TR 的改善独立相关。此外,IM 组的主要事件无事件生存率高于 Non-IM 组。

结论

相对较年轻的年龄和无 LR 是 RFCA 治疗持续性 AF 后 TR 改善的良好预测因素。此外,TR 的改善与更好的临床结果相关。

相似文献

1
Predictors and outcomes of tricuspid regurgitation improvement after radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.持续性心房颤动射频导管消融术后三尖瓣反流改善的预测因素和结果。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Jun;34(6):1360-1366. doi: 10.1111/jce.15919. Epub 2023 May 7.
2
Impact of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with left atrial enlargement.射频导管消融治疗左心房扩大的心房颤动的影响。
Heart Vessels. 2022 Nov;37(11):1899-1905. doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02094-z. Epub 2022 May 14.
3
Improvement in tricuspid regurgitation following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.心房颤动导管消融术后三尖瓣反流的改善
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;31(11):2883-2888. doi: 10.1111/jce.14707. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
4
Impact of catheter ablation on functional tricuspid regurgitation in patients with atrial fibrillation.导管消融对房颤患者功能性三尖瓣反流的影响。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Sep;66(6):1441-1453. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01410-x. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
5
Comparison of left atrial and left atrial appendage mechanics in the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation.射频导管消融术后房颤复发时左心房及左心耳力学比较
Echocardiography. 2023 Oct;40(10):1048-1057. doi: 10.1111/echo.15670. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
6
Clinical impact of very early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation.射频导管消融术后极早期心房颤动复发的临床影响。
J Cardiol. 2021 Dec;78(6):571-576. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
7
Left atrial emptying fraction predicts recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation.左心房排空分数可预测射频导管消融术后房颤复发。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 24;13(1):e0191196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191196. eCollection 2018.
8
Predictors of Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.长期持续性心房颤动患者射频导管消融术后窦性心律维持的预测因素
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Apr 15;193:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.01.047. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
9
Predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients who underwent a tricuspid valve operation with modified Cox maze procedure.行改良 Cox 迷宫术的三尖瓣手术患者心房颤动复发的预测因子。
Echocardiography. 2022 Mar;39(3):447-456. doi: 10.1111/echo.15315. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
10
Reduction of moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.经导管消融治疗心房颤动后中重度三尖瓣反流的减少。
Heart. 2024 Mar 12;110(7):523-530. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323244.

引用本文的文献

1
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with tricuspid regurgitation.三尖瓣反流患者心房颤动的导管消融治疗
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 May 17;6(8):1229-1231. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.05.015. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
A case of pulmonary vein reconnection after long-term success of pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation.一例房颤肺静脉隔离长期成功后出现肺静脉重新连接的病例。
J Arrhythm. 2024 Sep 19;40(6):1490-1493. doi: 10.1002/joa3.13149. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Sinus rhythm restoration reverses tricuspid regurgitation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
窦性心律恢复可逆转房颤患者的三尖瓣反流:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 2;19(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02891-9.
4
Postoperative Outcome in the Patients With Atrial Functional Atrioventricular Valve Insufficiency: Atrial Fibrillation Troubles, Always.心房功能性房室瓣关闭不全患者的术后结局:心房颤动问题始终存在。
Korean Circ J. 2023 Aug;53(8):563-565. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2023.0187.