Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Oct;98(4):543-551.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.04.2093. Epub 2023 May 5.
Reintervention modalities after myotomy failure in achalasia patients have yet to be established. The efficacy and safety of salvage peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for treatment of achalasia after myotomy failure were evaluated in the study.
Between August 2011 and August 2021 at the Endoscopy Center of Zhongshan Hospital, 219 achalasia patients who had previously undergone a myotomy underwent a salvage POEM and were thus retrospectively enrolled in this study. After propensity score matching (PSM), operation-related parameters were compared between the salvage POEM group and the naïve POEM group. Subgroup analysis was performed between patients with previous Heller myotomy (HM) and patients with previous POEM.
With similar baseline characteristics between both groups after PSM, the salvage POEM group presented with shorter tunnel length (11.8 ± 2.2 cm vs 12.8 ± .9 cm, P < .0001) and myotomy length (9.8 ± 2.0 cm vs 10.4 ± 1.0 cm, P < .0001) than the naïve POEM group. No significant differences were found in procedure-related adverse events between patients of salvage POEM and naïve POEM. The primary outcome of treatment success occurred in 175 of 193 patients (90.7%) in the salvage POEM group versus 362 of 374 patients (96.8%) in the naïve POEM group (P = .0046). At a 2- and 5-year follow-up, significantly higher rates of clinical failures were observed in the previous HM subgroup than in the previous POEM subgroup (P = .0433 and P = .0230, respectively).
Salvage POEM after a previous myotomy failure, especially after a POEM failure, is a promising treatment option because it has a durable clinical relief rate.
肌切开术失败后的再干预方式在贲门失弛缓症患者中尚未建立。本研究评估了挽救性经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)治疗肌切开术失败后贲门失弛缓症的疗效和安全性。
2011 年 8 月至 2021 年 8 月,中山医院内镜中心对 219 例先前接受肌切开术的贲门失弛缓症患者进行了挽救性 POEM,回顾性纳入本研究。通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,比较挽救性 POEM 组和初次 POEM 组的手术相关参数。对先前行 Heller 肌切开术(HM)和先前行 POEM 的患者进行亚组分析。
PSM 后两组患者的基线特征相似,挽救性 POEM 组的隧道长度(11.8 ± 2.2 cm 比 12.8 ±.9 cm,P <.0001)和肌切开长度(9.8 ± 2.0 cm 比 10.4 ± 1.0 cm,P <.0001)均短于初次 POEM 组。挽救性 POEM 组和初次 POEM 组患者在与手术相关的不良事件方面无显著差异。挽救性 POEM 组 193 例患者中有 175 例(90.7%)和初次 POEM 组 374 例患者中有 362 例(96.8%)达到主要治疗成功结局(P =.0046)。在 2 年和 5 年随访时,先前 HM 亚组的临床失败率明显高于先前 POEM 亚组(P =.0433 和 P =.0230)。
先前肌切开术失败后的挽救性 POEM,尤其是 POEM 失败后的挽救性 POEM,是一种很有前途的治疗选择,因为它具有持久的临床缓解率。