• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经口内镜肌切开术治疗既往行 Heller 肌切开术的贲门失弛缓症患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia with previous Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):47-56.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.056. Epub 2020 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.056
PMID:32522483
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Heller myotomy (HM) is considered the standard surgical treatment for patients with achalasia. However, approximately 10% to 20% of patients with achalasia have persistent or recurrent symptoms after HM that require further therapy. Several studies have reported the outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in these patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of POEM in patients with achalasia with previous HM.

METHODS

An electronic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to January 31, 2020. Studies evaluating the outcomes of POEM in patients with achalasia with previous HM were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes were the pooled rates of clinical success (defined as post-POEM Eckardt score ≤3), mean change in Eckardt score, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). The secondary outcomes were procedure-related adverse events (AEs) and incidence of postoperative GERD.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies involving 272 patients with achalasia were recruited in this review. POEM was successfully performed in 270 (99.3%) patients after previous HM. Clinical success was achieved in 90.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.1%-96.8%) of patients. Eckardt score, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and IRP were significantly lowered by 5.14 (95% CI, 4.19-6.09), 12.01 mm Hg (95% CI, 6.74-17.27), and 10.02 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.95-15.09), respectively. The pooled rates of postoperative symptomatic reflux, esophagitis, and abnormal pH monitoring were 36.9% (95% CI, 20.7%-53.1%), 33.0% (95% CI, 9.6%-56.4%), and 47.8% (95% CI, 33.4%-62.2%), respectively. Substantial heterogeneity was detected across all outcome measurements. Most of the AEs were self-limiting or managed conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

POEM is a safe and effective treatment for patients with achalasia with previous HM. Further data from prospective, controlled studies with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

背景和目的

Heller 肌切开术(HM)被认为是贲门失弛缓症患者的标准手术治疗方法。然而,约 10%至 20%的贲门失弛缓症患者在 HM 后仍存在持续性或复发性症状,需要进一步治疗。几项研究报道了经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)在这些患者中的治疗效果。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估 POEM 在既往 HM 治疗后的贲门失弛缓症患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

对 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了电子文献检索,检索时间截至 2020 年 1 月 31 日。评估 POEM 在既往 HM 治疗后的贲门失弛缓症患者中的疗效和安全性的研究符合纳入标准。主要结局是临床成功率(定义为 POEM 后 Eckardt 评分≤3)、Eckardt 评分的平均变化、食管下括约肌压力和整合松弛压力(IRP)。次要结局是与手术相关的不良事件(AE)和术后胃食管反流病(GERD)的发生率。

结果

本综述共纳入 9 项研究,共 272 例既往 HM 治疗后的贲门失弛缓症患者。在 270 例(99.3%)患者中成功完成了 POEM。90.0%(95%可信区间[CI],83.1%-96.8%)的患者达到了临床成功。Eckardt 评分、食管下括约肌压力和 IRP 分别显著降低了 5.14(95%CI,4.19-6.09)、12.01mmHg(95%CI,6.74-17.27)和 10.02mmHg(95%CI,4.95-15.09)。术后症状性反流、食管炎和异常 pH 监测的累积发生率分别为 36.9%(95%CI,20.7%-53.1%)、33.0%(95%CI,9.6%-56.4%)和 47.8%(95%CI,33.4%-62.2%)。所有结局指标均存在显著异质性。大多数 AE 是自限性的或保守治疗的。

结论

POEM 是既往 HM 治疗后的贲门失弛缓症患者的一种安全有效的治疗方法。需要前瞻性、对照研究的长期随访数据来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia with previous Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经口内镜肌切开术治疗既往行 Heller 肌切开术的贲门失弛缓症患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):47-56.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.056. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
2
Is peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) more effective than pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)是否比气囊扩张和 Heller 肌切开术更有效?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):1949-1962. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08353-w. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
3
Mid-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for the Treatment of Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经口内镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的中期和长期疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Apr;68(4):1386-1396. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07720-4. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
4
The Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy vs Pneumatic Dilation as Treatment for Patients With Achalasia Suffering From Persistent or Recurrent Symptoms After Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经口内镜肌切开术与气囊扩张治疗腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术后持续性或复发性贲门失弛缓症患者的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Gastroenterology. 2023 Jun;164(7):1108-1118.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.048. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
5
Comparative efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy and Heller myotomy in patients with achalasia: a meta-analysis.经口内镜下肌切开术与 Heller 肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Oct;90(4):546-558.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.05.046. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
Peroral endoscopic myotomy leads to higher rates of abnormal esophageal acid exposure than laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia.经口内镜肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症导致食管酸暴露异常的发生率高于腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2284-2292. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6522-4. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
7
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy with Dor Fundoplication for Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction (EGJOO): a Comparison of Outcomes and Impact on Physiology.经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)与腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开加 Dor 胃底折叠术治疗食管胃结合部流出道梗阻(EGJOO):结局比较和对生理学的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Nov;27(11):2684-2693. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05844-0. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
8
Long-term outcome of peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia in patients with previous Heller myotomy.曾接受过贲门肌层切开术的食管失弛缓症患者经口内镜下肌切开术的长期疗效
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2596-2601. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5267-1. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
9
Role of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Geriatric Patients with Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经口内镜下肌切开术在老年贲门失弛缓症患者中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis. 2022;40(1):106-114. doi: 10.1159/000516024. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
10
Peroral endoscopic myotomy as salvation technique post-Heller: International experience.经口内镜肌切开术作为 Heller 术后的挽救技术:国际经验。
Dig Endosc. 2018 Jan;30(1):52-56. doi: 10.1111/den.12918. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.与贲门失弛缓症经口内镜肌切开术结果相关的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3503-3519. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10862-3. Epub 2024 May 23.
2
Current Approach to Dysphagia: A Review Focusing on Esophageal Motility Disorders and Their Treatment.吞咽困难的当前治疗方法:以食管动力障碍及其治疗为重点的综述
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 8;30(6):403-413. doi: 10.1159/000529428. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Precision Endoscopy in Peroral Myotomies for Motility Disorders of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract: Current Insights and Prospective Avenues-A Comprehensive Review.
经口肌切开术治疗上消化道动力障碍的精准内镜检查:当前见解与未来方向——综述
Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 31;13(11):2143. doi: 10.3390/life13112143.
4
Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication following an unsuccessful peroral endoscopic myotomy.经口内镜下肌切开术失败后行腹腔镜Heller肌切开术和Dor胃底折叠术。
Surg Case Rep. 2023 Jun 14;9(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40792-023-01691-y.
5
Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction and Hiatal Hernia: Is Hernia Repair Alone Sufficient?胃食管结合部流出道梗阻和食管裂孔疝:疝修补术单独治疗足够吗?
JSLS. 2022 Oct-Dec;26(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00051.
6
Superselective arterial microcoil embolization for delayed bleeding after peroral endoscopic myotomy.经口内镜肌切开术后延迟性出血的超选择性动脉微线圈栓塞治疗。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Nov;50(11):3000605221135475. doi: 10.1177/03000605221135475.
7
Periprocedural safety profile of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)-a retrospective analysis of adverse events according to two different classifications.经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)的围手术期安全性概况——根据两种不同分类对不良事件的回顾性分析
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1242-1251. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09621-z. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
8
Esophageal Achalasia: Pros and Cons of the Treatment Options.食管失弛缓症:治疗选择的利弊。
World J Surg. 2022 Jul;46(7):1554-1560. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06495-z. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
9
A New Preparation Method for Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Patients with Achalasia Can Effectively Reduce the Esophageal Residual Contents: A Comparative Retrospective Study.一种用于贲门失弛缓症患者经口内镜下肌切开术的新制备方法可有效减少食管残余物:一项比较性回顾性研究。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2022 Feb 3;2022:6953166. doi: 10.1155/2022/6953166. eCollection 2022.
10
Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience.既往肌切开术后内镜下食管肌切开术期间的气体泄漏和黏膜损伤:单中心经验
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2021 May 20;14:173-179. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S297338. eCollection 2021.