Suppr超能文献

非药物干预对癌症成人设备测量体力活动的有效性,以及用于评估的方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of Non-pharmacologic Interventions on Device-measured Physical Activity in Adults With Cancer, and Methodology Used for Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

REVAL-Rehabilitation Research Center, BIOMED-Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.

Department of Physiotherapy, Postgraduate Program in Physiotherapy, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Dec;104(12):2123-2146. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 May 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of different types of interventions aimed at enhancing device-measured physical activity (PA) and summarize the devices and methodologies used to measure PA in adults with cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020199466). The search was conducted in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE (via Ovid), and PEDro from 2005 onward.

STUDY SELECTION

Prospective interventional studies (randomized controlled trials [RCTs], non-randomized controlled trials, and single-group trials), that included adults within 12 months from cancer diagnosis, and device-measured PA before and after commencement of an intervention were included. Studies were excluded if PA was measured at a single time point. Two independent reviewers screened 3033 records and 30 articles met the inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted the data. PEDro scale and GRADE approach were used to assess methodological quality of RCTs and overall quality of evidence, respectively. A meta-analysis of relevant RCTs was conducted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirty studies were identified, mainly including adults with multiple cancer types. Interventions were behavior change interventions (n=15), exercise training (n=13), neuromuscular electrostimulation (n=1), or a nutritional program (n=1). The meta-analysis showed improvements on moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA (MVPA) in the experimental group (8 studies; standardized mean difference (SMD)=0.23; 95% CI 0.06-0.39); with subgroup analysis showing that findings were mainly driven by behavior change interventions (5 studies; SMD=0.23, 95% CI 0.05-0.41). An uncertain effect on sedentary behavior, daily steps, and light intensity PA was found. PA was measured with medical devices and commercial wearables, quality of the methodology was variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Behavior change interventions increased device-derived MVPA in adult cancer patients who underwent the intervention within 12 months of the cancer diagnosis. Various devices and methodologies were used to assess PA, which limits comparisons across the studies.

摘要

目的

研究旨在提高设备测量体力活动(PA)效果的不同类型干预措施,并总结用于测量癌症成人 PA 的设备和方法。

数据来源

系统评价在 PROSPERO(CRD42020199466)上进行了前瞻性注册。从 2005 年起,在 PubMed、The Cochrane Library、EMBASE(通过 Ovid)和 PEDro 进行了搜索。

研究选择

包括癌症诊断后 12 个月内的成年人在内的前瞻性干预研究(随机对照试验 [RCT]、非随机对照试验和单组试验),以及在干预开始前后使用设备测量 PA 的研究。仅在一个时间点测量 PA 的研究被排除在外。两名独立审查员筛选了 3033 条记录,其中 30 篇文章符合纳入标准。

数据提取

两名审查员独立提取数据。PEDro 量表和 GRADE 方法分别用于评估 RCT 的方法学质量和证据的总体质量。对相关 RCT 进行了荟萃分析。

数据综合

确定了 30 项研究,主要包括多种癌症类型的成年人。干预措施包括行为改变干预(n=15)、运动训练(n=13)、神经肌肉电刺激(n=1)或营养计划(n=1)。荟萃分析显示,实验组的中度至剧烈强度 PA(MVPA)有所改善(8 项研究;标准化均数差(SMD)=0.23;95%置信区间 0.06-0.39);亚组分析表明,这主要是由行为改变干预措施驱动的(5 项研究;SMD=0.23,95%置信区间 0.05-0.41)。对久坐行为、每日步数和低强度 PA 的影响不确定。PA 使用医疗设备和商业可穿戴设备进行测量,方法质量各不相同。

结论

在癌症诊断后 12 个月内接受干预的癌症成年患者中,行为改变干预措施增加了设备测量的 MVPA。各种设备和方法用于评估 PA,这限制了研究之间的比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验