Zheng Jing, Zhou Minghua, Zhu Bo, Fan Junliang, Lin Hongyu, Ren Bing, Zhang Fucang
Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Process and Ecological Regulation, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu 610041, China.
Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Process and Ecological Regulation, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu 610041, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Aug 15;886:163804. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163804. Epub 2023 May 6.
Drip fertigation can synchronize the supply of nutrients and water for crop demand, offering the potential for minimizing negative environmental impacts and sustaining crop productivity. However, there are no comprehensive evaluations on performances of drip fertigation on environmental nitrogen (N) losses and crop productivity, nationwide. Here, a meta-analysis was performed to quantify overall effects of drip fertigation on N losses and crop productivity in Chinese agricultural systems based on 443 observations from 42 field studies. The results showed that drip fertigation significantly increased crop yields by 9.8 % and slightly increased soil NO emission by 13.9 % compared to the traditional irrigation and fertilization practices (e.g. flooding/furrow irrigation and N broadcasting), while significantly decreasing NH volatilization by 14.2 %, soil NO emission by 28.1 % and NO-N leaching loss by 71.2 %. There were significant mitigation potentials of environmental N losses by drip fertigation for cereal cropping systems, not for horticultural crops in terms of soil NO emission and not for cotton in terms of NH volatilization. Non significant promotion effect on NO emission and significant reduction effects on the other all kinds of environmental N losses by drip fertigation were observed for alkaline soils (pH > 7.3) and coarse-textured soils. In addition, the use of different fertilizer sources and/or soil amendments have shown in popularity as strategies to offset the negative feedback associated with agricultural N losses, no direct synthetic result was shown in drip-fertigated soils. We synthesized 19 studies so as to assess the potential mitigation options for further minimizing N losses in drip fertigation systems, which suggested that deleterious environmental pollution could be further reduced while still achieving high crop yields with a combination of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers (e.g. nitrification or urease inhibitors) or soil amendments (e.g. biochar or straw) to drip fertigation systems.
滴灌施肥能够使养分供应与作物对水分的需求同步,具有将负面环境影响降至最低并维持作物生产力的潜力。然而,目前全国范围内尚未对滴灌施肥在环境氮素(N)损失和作物生产力方面的表现进行全面评估。在此,基于42项田间研究的443个观测数据,进行了一项荟萃分析,以量化滴灌施肥对中国农业系统中氮素损失和作物生产力的总体影响。结果表明,与传统灌溉和施肥方式(如淹灌/沟灌和撒施氮肥)相比,滴灌施肥显著提高了作物产量9.8%,土壤一氧化氮(NO)排放量略有增加13.9%,同时显著降低了氨(NH)挥发14.2%、土壤NO排放量28.1%以及硝态氮(NO-N)淋失量71.2%。对于谷类作物种植系统,滴灌施肥在减少环境氮素损失方面具有显著潜力,但对于园艺作物在土壤NO排放方面以及棉花在NH挥发方面则没有显著效果。对于碱性土壤(pH>7.3)和质地粗糙的土壤,滴灌施肥对NO排放没有显著促进作用,但对其他各类环境氮素损失具有显著减少作用。此外,使用不同的肥料来源和/或土壤改良剂已成为抵消与农业氮素损失相关的负面反馈的常用策略,但在滴灌施肥土壤中未显示出直接的综合效果。我们综合了19项研究,以评估进一步减少滴灌施肥系统中氮素损失的潜在缓解措施,结果表明,通过在滴灌施肥系统中结合增效肥料(如硝化抑制剂或脲酶抑制剂)或土壤改良剂(如生物炭或秸秆),在实现高作物产量的同时,可进一步减少有害环境污染。