Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Oct;42(10):1399-1407. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.04.017. Epub 2023 May 6.
The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is not currently incorporated into US allocation models due to the historical lack of complete data in the national US registry which changed in 2016 to include ECMO at the time of waitlist removal and more granular timing and configuration data.
We studied adult lung transplant candidates from May 1, 2016 to June 1, 2020 with data abstracted from multiple sources in the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Waitlist analyses included cumulative incidence functions and Cox proportional hazards models considering ECMO as a time-dependent variable. Post-transplant analyses included Kaplan Meier, Cox proportional hazards models, and observed to expected survival ratios.
A total of 867 candidates were on ECMO prior to transplant; 247 were identified using new sources of data. Candidates on ECMO had a 23.9 increased adjusted likelihood of waitlist removal for being too sick or death, but only a 4.08 increased adjusted likelihood of transplant. Candidates bridged with ECMO who underwent lung transplant (N = 587) experienced an increased overall hazard of post-transplant mortality with veno-arterial and veno-venous configurations conferring hazard ratio (HR) = 1.67 (95% CI, 1.16, 2.40), HR = 1.45 (95% CI, 1.15, 1.82), respectively.
We identified an additional 28.5% of candidates bridged with ECMO prior to transplant using new data. This study of the newly identified full cohort of ECMO candidates demonstrates higher utilization of ECMO as well as an underestimation of waitlist mortality risk factors that should inform strategies to provide timely access to transplants for this population.
由于美国国家注册处历史上缺乏完整的数据,因此体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)目前并未纳入美国的分配模型。这一情况在 2016 年发生了改变,当时登记处开始在候补名单移除时纳入 ECMO,并增加了更详细的时间和配置数据。
我们研究了 2016 年 5 月 1 日至 2020 年 6 月 1 日期间的成年肺移植候选者,数据来自美国移植受者科学注册处的多个来源。候补名单分析包括累积发生率函数和 Cox 比例风险模型,将 ECMO 视为一个时间依赖性变量。移植后分析包括 Kaplan-Meier 分析、Cox 比例风险模型和观察到的与预期的生存比。
共有 867 名候选者在移植前使用 ECMO;其中 247 名是通过新数据源确定的。由于病情过重或死亡而被移除候补名单的候选者中,使用 ECMO 的患者调整后被移除的可能性增加了 23.9%,但接受移植的可能性仅增加了 4.08%。接受 ECMO 桥接并接受肺移植的候选者(N=587)的移植后总死亡风险增加,静脉-动脉和静脉-静脉配置的危险比(HR)分别为 1.67(95%CI,1.16,2.40)和 1.45(95%CI,1.15,1.82)。
我们使用新数据确定了之前移植前使用 ECMO 桥接的候选者增加了 28.5%。这项对新确定的 ECMO 候选者全队列的研究表明,ECMO 的使用有所增加,同时也低估了候补名单死亡风险因素,这应该为该人群提供及时接受移植的策略提供信息。