• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

完全直肠脱垂的手术治疗的网状荟萃分析。

A network meta-analysis of surgical treatments of complete rectal prolapse.

机构信息

Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, 33331, USA.

Colorectal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Oct;27(10):787-797. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02813-2. Epub 2023 May 8.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-023-02813-2
PMID:37150800
Abstract

PURPOSE

Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse can be undertaken via an abdominal or a perineal approach. The present network meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of different abdominal and perineal procedures for rectal prolapse in terms of recurrence, complications, and improvement in fecal incontinence (FI).

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted. Randomized clinical trials comparing two or more procedures for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROB-2 tool. The main outcomes were recurrence of full-thickness rectal prolapse, complications, operation time, and improvement in FI.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials with 728 patients were included. The follow-up ranged between 12 and 47 months. Posterior mesh rectopexy had significantly lower odds of recurrence than did the Altemeier procedure (logOR, - 12.75;  95% credible intervals, - 40.91, - 1.75), Delorme procedure (- 13.10; - 41.26, - 2.09), resection rectopexy (- 11.98; - 41.36, - 0.19), sponge rectopexy (- 13.19; - 42.87, - 0.54), and sutured rectopexy (- 13.12; - 42.58, - 1.50), but similar odds to ventral mesh rectopexy (- 12.09; - 41.7, 0.03). Differences among the procedures in complications, operation time, and improvement in FI were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior mesh rectopexy ranked best with the lowest recurrence while perineal procedures ranked worst with the highest recurrence rates.

摘要

目的

完全性直肠脱垂的手术治疗可通过腹部或会阴途径进行。本网络荟萃分析旨在比较不同腹部和会阴手术治疗直肠脱垂在复发、并发症和改善粪便失禁(FI)方面的结局。

方法

对 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 进行了符合 PRISMA 标准的系统评价。纳入比较两种或两种以上手术治疗完全性直肠脱垂的随机临床试验。使用 ROB-2 工具评估偏倚风险。主要结局是全层直肠脱垂复发、并发症、手术时间和 FI 改善。

结果

纳入了 9 项随机对照试验,共 728 名患者。随访时间为 12 至 47 个月。后兜带直肠固定术的复发率明显低于 Altemeier 手术(对数比值比,-12.75;95%可信区间,-40.91,-1.75)、Delorme 手术(-13.10;-41.26,-2.09)、直肠切除固定术(-11.98;-41.36,-0.19)、海绵直肠固定术(-13.19;-42.87,-0.54)和缝合直肠固定术(-13.12;-42.58,-1.50),但与腹侧网片直肠固定术的复发率相似(-12.09;-41.7,0.03)。各手术方法在并发症、手术时间和 FI 改善方面的差异无统计学意义。

结论

后兜带直肠固定术复发率最低,会阴手术复发率最高。

相似文献

1
A network meta-analysis of surgical treatments of complete rectal prolapse.完全直肠脱垂的手术治疗的网状荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Oct;27(10):787-797. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02813-2. Epub 2023 May 8.
2
Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse in male patients.系统文献回顾和荟萃分析男性完全性直肠脱垂的手术治疗。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Nov 13;28(1):158. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03039-6.
3
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs Delorme's operation in management of complete rectal prolapse: a prospective randomized study.腹腔镜下腹膜网片直肠固定术与德洛姆手术治疗完全性直肠脱垂的前瞻性随机研究
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jan;19(1):50-57. doi: 10.1111/codi.13399.
4
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for the treatment of obstructed defaecation syndrome and/or faecal incontinence in patients with internal rectal prolapse: a critical appraisal of the first 100 cases.使用生物补片的腹腔镜下腹直肌固定术治疗直肠内脱垂患者的排便梗阻综合征和/或大便失禁:对前100例病例的批判性评估
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Apr;19(4):209-19. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1255-4. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
5
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in male patients with external rectal prolapse is associated with a high reoperation rate.男性直肠外脱垂患者行腹腔镜腹侧直肠固定术的再手术率较高。
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Oct;20(10):715-20. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1528-1. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
6
Abdominal rectopexy for the treatment of internal rectal prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹直肌固定术治疗直肠内脱垂:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jan;19(1):O13-O24. doi: 10.1111/codi.13574.
7
Surgery for complete (full-thickness) rectal prolapse in adults.成人完全性(全层)直肠脱垂的手术治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 24;2015(11):CD001758. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001758.pub3.
8
Anterior rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: Technical and functional results.全层直肠脱垂的前路直肠固定术:技术与功能结果
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 28;21(16):5049-55. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.5049.
9
Outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness external rectal prolapse: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of the predictors for recurrence.腹腔镜下腹膜直肠前突修补术治疗完全性直肠外脱垂的疗效:复发预测因素的系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2444-2455. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06803-0. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
10
Ventral mesh rectopexy for recurrent rectal prolapse after Altemeier perineal proctosigmoidectomy: feasibility and outcomes.经会阴直肠前切除术(Altemeier 手术)后复发直肠脱垂行腹侧网片直肠固定术:可行性和结局。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Feb 2;409(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03227-w.

引用本文的文献

1
A bibliometric analysis of surgical treatment for rectal prolapse.直肠脱垂手术治疗的文献计量分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 8;104(32):e43763. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043763.
2
[Surgery of rectal prolapse : Which treatment procedure for which patient?].[直肠脱垂手术:针对不同患者应选择哪种治疗方法?]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Sep;96(9):737-742. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02346-4. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
3
Comparative Outcomes of Transabdominal and Transperineal Approaches for Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse Repair: A Fourteen-Year Retrospective Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of four surgical approaches for rectal prolapse: multicentre randomized clinical trial.四种直肠前突手术方法的比较:多中心随机临床试验。
BJS Open. 2022 Jan 6;6(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab140.
2
Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与开放直肠固定术治疗直肠脱垂:一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2021 Mar 29;13(3):e14175. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14175.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
经腹与经会阴入路全层直肠脱垂修复术的比较结果:一项十四年回顾性研究
Gastroenterology Res. 2025 Apr;18(2):85-92. doi: 10.14740/gr2015. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
4
Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse in male patients.系统文献回顾和荟萃分析男性完全性直肠脱垂的手术治疗。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Nov 13;28(1):158. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03039-6.
5
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy Versus Laparoscopic Mesh Rectopexy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜缝合直肠固定术与腹腔镜补片直肠固定术的疗效:系统评价与Meta分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 4;16(6):e61631. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61631. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Comparative study of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy versus perineal stapler resection for external full-thickness rectal prolapse in elderly patients: enhanced outcomes and reduced recurrence rates-a retrospective cohort study.老年患者完全性直肠脱垂的腹腔镜腹侧补片直肠固定术与会阴吻合器切除术的比较研究:改善预后并降低复发率——一项回顾性队列研究
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Apr 15;28(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02919-1.
7
Ventral mesh rectopexy for recurrent rectal prolapse after Altemeier perineal proctosigmoidectomy: feasibility and outcomes.经会阴直肠前切除术(Altemeier 手术)后复发直肠脱垂行腹侧网片直肠固定术:可行性和结局。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Feb 2;409(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03227-w.
8
Splenic flexure cancer: is right extended hemicolectomy better than left hemicolectomy?脾曲结肠癌:右扩大结肠切除术优于左扩大结肠切除术吗?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 14;408(1):402. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03135-5.
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Recurrence after Delorme's procedure in a single and multi-surgeon setting.单一术者和多术者环境下 Delorme 手术的复发情况。
S Afr J Surg. 2020 Jun;5(2):78-85.
5
Cost-analysis and quality of life after laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for posterior compartment prolapse: a randomized trial.腹腔镜和机器人后盆腔脱垂补片固定术治疗后盆腔脱垂的成本分析和生活质量:一项随机试验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 May;23(5):461-470. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01991-2. Epub 2019 May 8.
6
Outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness external rectal prolapse: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of the predictors for recurrence.腹腔镜下腹膜直肠前突修补术治疗完全性直肠外脱垂的疗效:复发预测因素的系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2444-2455. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06803-0. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
7
Network meta-analysis: the highest level of medical evidence?网状Meta分析:医学证据的最高级别?
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Apr;23(2):56-59. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110887. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
8
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Rectal Prolapse.直肠脱垂治疗临床实践指南
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Nov;60(11):1121-1131. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000889.
9
Perineal resectional procedures for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse: A systematic review of the literature.经会阴直肠切除术治疗完全性直肠脱垂:文献系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2017 Oct;46:146-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
10
Bowel function after laparoscopic posterior sutured rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a double-blind, randomised single-centre study.腹腔镜后缝合法直肠固定术与腹侧网片直肠固定术治疗直肠脱垂的肠功能比较:一项双盲、随机、单中心研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Dec;1(4):291-297. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30085-1. Epub 2016 Oct 4.